On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Whitequill Riclo wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Feuerbacher, Alan < > > afeuerbac...@allegromicro.com> wrote: > > > >> William Harrington wrote: > >> > >>> Sometimes you can't build mpfr mpc and gmp within the gcc source tree > >>> for some targets. We found that out in CLFS. That's we we don't build > >>> gmp mpc and mpfr within the tree. Works okay for x86 and x86_64, > >>> however, when you start building for other targets, it becomes hairy. > >>> You may want to try to build gmp mpfr and mpc separately. > >> > >> I've been mostly quietly keeping up with this question on several lists: > >> is it better to build those programs in the source tree or separately? > >> There's a discussion somewhere (on a gcc list?) that comes down > strongly on > >> the side of building them in the source tree. It even asks why anyone > would > >> want to do it differently. Yet the programs contain instructions for > >> tuning, which requires them to be built separately. > >> > >> During the 1 1/2 years I've been playing around with compiling gcc and > all > >> of the LFS programs, I've experimented with building separately many > times. > >> No problem building them, but gcc usually fails to find at least one of > >> them. > >> > >> Now, I'm a real newbie when it comes to all this, but if anyone knows > why > >> gcc can't seem to find the programs, I'd sure like to know. I'm trying > to > >> understand all the ins and outs of everything covered by LFS and a lot > more > >> besides. > >> > >> Alan > >> > > I've already succeeded at building gmp, and mpc with in the gcc build > > directory, I need to make mpfr, what do you suggest I do? > > > > Is there a way to just build the following code block; > > Needs #include <mpfr.h> > > > 1. | int > > 2. | main () > > 3. | { > > 4. | mpfr_t x; mpfr_init(x) ; mpfr_clear(x); > > 5. | > > 6. | ; > > 7. | return 0; > > 8. | } > > > > and then re-run make? > > After lfs is completed, there are the files /usr/lib/libmpfr.{a,so). > How about: > > gcc -o xyz xyz.c -lmpfr > > Works for me. > > $ ldd xyz > linux-gate.so.1 (0xffffe000) > libmpfr.so.4 => /usr/lib/libmpfr.so.4 (0xb7735000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7584000) > libgmp.so.10 => /usr/lib/libgmp.so.10 (0xb751f000) > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb77a7000) > > -- Bruce > I think I know what I'm doing wrong finally, all the command flags I'm > using to find mpfr are to find the mpfr library/header file, rather then > find the source to build the library. > What is the appropriate flag to tell gcc the source path rather then the library path? > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page >
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page