On 2012-08-09 03:31:30 +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> Yes, this is a crude attempt at trolling Justin into keeping the only
> lib without Doxygen warnings that way.
> ---
>
> SCNR ;-p
>
> libavresample/resample.c | 9 ++-------
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libavresample/resample.c b/libavresample/resample.c
> index 1c3d13a..161388b 100644
> --- a/libavresample/resample.c
> +++ b/libavresample/resample.c
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ struct ResampleContext {
>
> /**
> * 0th order modified bessel function of the first kind.
> + * @param x FIXME: i want to be documented
> */
drop it, documenting arguments to mathematical functions is silly
> static double bessel(double x)
> {
> @@ -89,13 +90,7 @@ static double bessel(double x)
> /**
> * Build a polyphase filterbank.
> *
> - * @param[out] filter filter coefficients
> - * @param factor resampling factor
> - * @param tap_count tap count
> - * @param phase_count phase count
> - * @param scale wanted sum of coefficients for each filter
> - * @param filter_type filter type
> - * @param kaiser_beta kaiser window beta
> + * @param c FIXME: i want to be documented
> * @return 0 on success, negative AVERROR code on failure
drop it or document it as 'an ResampleContext'
Janne
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
