On 2012-08-11 20:39:06 +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 11:51:33AM +0200, Janne Grunau wrote:
> > On 2012-08-09 03:31:27 +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > The comments in non-library code never apply to code that is used
> > > outside of the file and thus never need to be in Doxygen format.
> > > --- a/Doxyfile
> > > +++ b/Doxyfile
> > > @@ -616,7 +616,11 @@ RECURSIVE              = YES
> > >  # excluded from the INPUT source files. This way you can easily exclude a
> > >  # subdirectory from a directory tree whose root is specified with the 
> > > INPUT tag.
> > >  
> > > -EXCLUDE                =
> > > +EXCLUDE                = compat                                         \
> > > +                         doc                                            \
> > > +                         presets                                        \
> > > +                         tests                                          \
> > > +                         tools                                          \
> > 
> > is there anything in '.' which would have useful Doxygen comments?
> > Specifying the library dirs explicitly as search path makes imho more
> > sense than excluding everything else.
> 
> avconv.c
> avconv_filter.c
> avconv.h
> avconv_opt.c
> avplay.c
> avserver.c
> cmdutils.c
> cmdutils.h

and which useful doxygen comments have those files? I've only looked at
avconv.c and couldn't spot any. Also who would use them if it had any?

Janne
_______________________________________________
libav-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel

Reply via email to