Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 08:47:22PM +0200, Janne Grunau wrote: >> On 2012-08-11 20:39:06 +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 11:51:33AM +0200, Janne Grunau wrote: >> > > On 2012-08-09 03:31:27 +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote: >> > > > The comments in non-library code never apply to code that is used >> > > > outside of the file and thus never need to be in Doxygen format. >> > > > --- a/Doxyfile >> > > > +++ b/Doxyfile >> > > > @@ -616,7 +616,11 @@ RECURSIVE = YES >> > > > # excluded from the INPUT source files. This way you can easily >> > > > exclude a >> > > > # subdirectory from a directory tree whose root is specified with the >> > > > INPUT tag. >> > > > >> > > > -EXCLUDE = >> > > > +EXCLUDE = compat >> > > > \ >> > > > + doc >> > > > \ >> > > > + presets >> > > > \ >> > > > + tests >> > > > \ >> > > > + tools >> > > > \ >> > > >> > > is there anything in '.' which would have useful Doxygen comments? >> > > Specifying the library dirs explicitly as search path makes imho more >> > > sense than excluding everything else. >> > >> > avconv.c >> > avconv_filter.c >> > avconv.h >> > avconv_opt.c >> > avplay.c >> > avserver.c >> > cmdutils.c >> > cmdutils.h >> >> and which useful doxygen comments have those files? I've only looked at >> avconv.c and couldn't spot any. > > Look at cmdutils.h, it is quite extensively documented.
Perhaps, but it's of no interest to API users. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
