On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 08:47:22PM +0200, Janne Grunau wrote: > On 2012-08-11 20:39:06 +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 11:51:33AM +0200, Janne Grunau wrote: > > > On 2012-08-09 03:31:27 +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote: > > > > The comments in non-library code never apply to code that is used > > > > outside of the file and thus never need to be in Doxygen format. > > > > --- a/Doxyfile > > > > +++ b/Doxyfile > > > > @@ -616,7 +616,11 @@ RECURSIVE = YES > > > > # excluded from the INPUT source files. This way you can easily > > > > exclude a > > > > # subdirectory from a directory tree whose root is specified with the > > > > INPUT tag. > > > > > > > > -EXCLUDE = > > > > +EXCLUDE = compat > > > > \ > > > > + doc > > > > \ > > > > + presets > > > > \ > > > > + tests > > > > \ > > > > + tools > > > > \ > > > > > > is there anything in '.' which would have useful Doxygen comments? > > > Specifying the library dirs explicitly as search path makes imho more > > > sense than excluding everything else. > > > > avconv.c > > avconv_filter.c > > avconv.h > > avconv_opt.c > > avplay.c > > avserver.c > > cmdutils.c > > cmdutils.h > > and which useful doxygen comments have those files? I've only looked at > avconv.c and couldn't spot any.
Look at cmdutils.h, it is quite extensively documented. Diego _______________________________________________ libav-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libav.org/mailman/listinfo/libav-devel
