This is dragging out, so I'm going to try to be brief. On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 06:07:36PM -0700, Greg wrote: > You may also be misunderstanding our NDA.
I'm not misunderstanding it. I didn't bother to read it, because the mere fact that it exists is the problem. People who are serious about open source and peer review of code do not limit peer review, nor attempt to legally constrain the reviewers, nor try to cherry-pick the reviewers based on perceived expertise or personal qualities. In or out of the pool. You wanna be closed source? Go for it. But please, stop disengenously pretending to be open source when you're clearly not. ---rsk p.s. In re: "[...] we want to do our best to keep the software in the hands of honest, trustworthy folks [...]" -- you've got to be kidding. I *hope* you're kidding. -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu.
