Hi Greg. The burden of proof is on Espionage to convince people that it is safe. I can't trust it based on marketing claims alone.
There is not a sufficiently detailed design document on the website, much less a battle-tested, peer-reviewed design. I don't see any reference to independent third-party audits. I can't find any indication the development team has security or crypto expertise and I cannot personally sign an NDA to view the source code. If I'm missing something or you're willing to give source access without an NDA, please let me know. Otherwise, I have to advise people to avoid Espionage. On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Greg <g...@kinostudios.com> wrote: > > Stating a thing does not make it true, not matter how many times it is > repeated. > It is not "apply". It is apply. > Anyone is welcome, so long as they: > > 1. Are software security professionals. (Nobody else matters in this context, > after all.) > 2. Don't work for government intelligence agencies. > 3. Sign the NDA we give them, the salient points of which are enumerated on > our site. > > They will be given a free license to Espionage. > > Also, you convince me how to keep providing high quality software and support > while simultaneously making Espionage completely free and open source and I > will do it in a flash. -- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable on Google. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech. Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at compa...@stanford.edu.
