On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:36:54 -0700, Robert D. Silvetz, M.D.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I just read the Heller decision.
>
> Once again, admitting a premise of the enemy eviscerated the significance
> that this lawsuit could have had.
>
> Yes -- 2nd Am is an individual right. Big whoopy do. The decision
> doesn't
> crush ANY of the rules on the books ESPEcIALLY the noxious item of
> licensing
> requirements.
>
> But since "Heller conceded... licensing... fair... if not capriciously or
> arbitrarily enforced" I STILL HAVE TO ASK FUCKING PERMISSION TO USE MY
> 2nd
> Am rights.
>
> Sadness... and 4 f'ing Supremes DISSENTED!!!! Fascists.
The Supremes didn't want the Cold Civil War started again, so they
did the minimum. I'm surprised that they didn't contrive a Fourteenth
Amendment arguement and leave the Second out of it.
Given how much our government operates by force chicane, I suspect
that we've got lots of big fights ahead of us.
>
--
"Implications leading to ramifications leading to shenanigans." Admiral
Elmo Zumwalt, USN
