The response (a Threat) is perfectly justified Coercion, because it is not Initiation of Force or even a Threat to Initiate Force. Thus we agree that that Threat is not a violation of the Non-Aggression Principle.
--- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com, Valentine Michael Smith <bkoehl...@...> wrote: > > The trespasser has initiated force. > > The response is in defense of property. > > Any questions? > > Zack Bass wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In LibertarianEnterprise@yahoogroups.com > > <mailto:LibertarianEnterprise%40yahoogroups.com>, Wraith <wraith@> > > wrote: > > > > > > At 02:48 PM 8/13/2009, you wrote: > > > > > > > >Are you seriously suggesting that saying to a > > > >trespasser, "If you don't get off my lawn I will > > > >shoot you" is a violation of the Non-Aggression Principle? > > > > > > Unwarranted assumption on your part. > > > > > > > Unattractive evasion on your part. > > > > >
