n Tue, 07 Dec 2004 05:18:14 -0700, Bill Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 21:36 -0800, Travis Pahl wrote:
>
>
> > On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 19:52:19 -0800, Lowell C. Savage
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Good evening, Tim!
> > >
> > >
> > > > Lowell
> > > >
> > > > > In fact, a few of them even accuse the President of secretly
> > > > > telling Congresscritters to make sure the bill didn't reach his
> > > > > desk.
> > > >
> > > > > Had he done so, it would not have violated his promise to
> > > > > "sign the bill." And, so far as I know, he has not denied that
> > > > > he did so.
> > > >
> > > > This does not seem good to me.
> > >
> > > I don't know why.
> > >
> > > > > After 8 years of parsing Clinton, "if it gets to my desk,
> > > > > I'll sign it" is a model of clear political speech.
> > > >
> > > > Clear? Hardly if it allows Bush to go against the bill.
> > >
> > > Remember, Bill Clinton was telling the truth when he said "I did not have
> > > sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky." You see, he did not consider the
> > > things he did with her to be sex. We had 8 years of Bill Clinton saying
> > > stuff like that (regarding his scandals, his policies, his actions, his
> > > intentions, his ... you get the picture.) EVERY time Bill said something,
> > > you had to look at every word and ask if there was some meaning to the
> > > word
> > > that could give him an "out" of some sort or make it possible that the
> > > sentence meant something entirely different than most people would think.
> >
> > Yeah, we remember. But the point he was making has nothing to do with
> > Clinton. You see we are not talking about democrats, we are not
> > talking about bill clinton, so please do not use them to try and
> > distract from the fact that the republicans are no good. yes we know
> > democrats suck as well. That is not in question. It is like we are
> > trying to say that that the atlantic ocean has alot of water in it and
> > you are saying, "no the pacific ocean has alot of water in it." Which
> > is correct it does, but no one here is disputing that the pacific
> > ocean has alot of water.
>
> Ooh! Ooh! Can I? I want to dispute that! ;)
>
> No seriously, I can. :D
>
How about the pacific ocean contains lots of water. Can you dispute that? :0
_______________________________________________
Libnw mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw
Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw
