shadow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > r>>> ... OK, what if instead a statute made it legal for all Chinese to > r>>> carry guns without permits? Or all members of the Elks? Or all > r>>> persons who do not have pets or children?
> s>> Unacceptable. The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be > s>> infringed. Period. > r> But if it IS infringed, you'd rather not have any diminution of the > r> infringement, huh? >Sorry, Rob, I have to be an absolutist on this issue. Allowing off-duty or >retired police officers to carry concealed is not an expansion of the >"people's" rights. Aren't cops people? >It's an expansion of the govt's authority. How do you figure, when it's about OFF DUTY & RETIRED officers? It's about their personal use of guns, not the job. In Your Sly Tribe, Robert in the Bronx _______________________________________________ Libnw mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw
