On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 21:32 -0800, Frank Reichert wrote: > Good evening again, Bill! > > Bill Anderson wrote in response to Ed Fischange... > > Ed Fischang wrote: > > > Remember Rodger from the CDC in Atlanta? What a character! As was John > > > King. > > > I know you miss Roger Erdman. I found it hard to converse with someone who > > > was all emotion, no logic, but he did spice it up. Robert and Bill are > > > almost > > > the opposite, > > To which, you replied: > > Nah, I got plenty. I just save it for my wife and now three children. :D > > My reflections tonight went back quite a while... even so far > back as the Fidonet days. At least one marriage ago, and three > children, also. > > Don't understand at all your reluctance to deal with real people, > regardless of your state in matrimony, or the number of children > involved in the historical progession of a political newsgroup.
Maybe because you are confusing dealing with "real people" with being emotional? IMO emotion belongs where it belongs. Political decisions based in emotion are often bad for liberty. > Guess I have to ask. I have had three wifes. One who died in > 1995. One other one who divorced me. And my present one. I also > have five children in all of this. Don't know exactly how you > wish to relate any of this to your reluctance at best, to dealing > with all of the personalities, included Ed Fischag that still > grace our presence today! I don't fit your square hole, so the question is void. I don't understand why you think your three marriages have anything to do with mine, or my preference for reason and login in a medium that expresses emotion poorly on a subject matter that emotion serves poorly. > > Ed wrote: > > > (Ian and JQS would have the Technocracy provide the drinks, of course.) > > To which, you responded... > > > Bwaahahahahahhaa! > > As usual, and I expected it as such. Why not, it was clearly a joke, didn't you get it?!?! If not, that's sad. If so, then why are you attacking me for laughing at it. Geez Frank. Talk about not dealing with real people. I laugh at what was clearly a joke and you turn it into something sinister or "unreal" or whatever mud you think you can stick to me today. But ... I am rubber you are glue. Whatever you call me bounces of me and sticks to you. Nyah nyah. And in case you didn't get it, that was a joke. That was not. ;) Cheers, Bill -- Random Fortune of the moment: How do you insult a lawyer? You might as well not even try. Consider: of all the highly trained and educated professions, law is the only one in which the prime lesson is that *winning* is more important than *truth*. Once someone has sunk to that level, what worse can you say about them? _______________________________________________ Libnw mailing list Libnw@immosys.com List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw