https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113388
--- Comment #41 from Mr. Beedell, Roke Julian Lockhart (RJLB) <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 207368 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=207368&action=edit A Screenshot, Of LOW 26.2.3.2, In KDE Plasma 6.6.5, With Breeze In KDE Plasma 6, LO looks nearly identical to the rest of the OS, for it adheres to the QStyle and KColorScheme QPalettes defined in their relevant KCMs. It could do with some additional separators, but that's outside of the scope of this discussion. The window decorations can be disabled in Windows, if desirable, too. Though, you're correct that it's less convenient. However, CSDs would solely ever appear native in Windows if LibreOffice somehow adopted a Fluent Design style. To elaborate, in lieu of LO: - …adopting https://github.com/zhiyiYo/PyQt-Fluent-Widgets/ (which is not FOSS); - …replacing their Qt frontends with: - …https://github.com/wxWidgets/wxWidgets/issues/19352#issue-1100648687 (when it's been resolved), or: - …QML, to utilise the FluentWinUI3 QQuickStyle, or: - …implementing another frontend, in WinUI3 (via XAML Islands), …it can never appear native on some OSes, with CSDs. At least SSDs allow the OS to render the title bar! That gets it closer to a native appearance than a CSD can, without them switching toolkits. Considering that my brother was happy to switch to it when he moved to Linux at 16 years of age (so, about two years ago), I'm not even certain that the general public much cares about its appearance, insofar as it's not skeumorphic. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
