https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113388
--- Comment #42 from [email protected] --- Created attachment 207375 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=207375&action=edit Comparison of office apps > > …it can never appear native on some OSes, with CSDs. At least SSDs allow the > OS to render the title bar! That gets it closer to a native appearance than > a CSD can, without them switching toolkits. > I completely agree with what D.F. said earlier, and we're losing sight of the point, even in the argument itself. This isn't about debating "what I like," especially not using an example from a niche like ours with GNU/Linux. Besides, it's pointless, since web browsers like Firefox would have maintained the use of SSDs by default, which isn't the case. OnlyOffice is currently very popular. It doesn't specifically adapt to each OS/DE's design language, but it still looks modern and integrated into each OS/DE, and that's the point of discussion here. Even without increasing, for example, vertical space to create a more visible or touch-friendly interface. In the attached screenshot, my desktop is scaled to 125%. Both WPS and OnlyOffice have more modern interfaces. In LibO, I'm using a tabbed NotebookBar (not used by default). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
