A FSF recomendou as seguintes ações em resposta: * **[Write to Mozilla CTO Andreas Gal and let him know that you oppose DRM](mailto: agal [at] mozilla [dot] com)**. Mozilla made this decision in a misguided appeal to its userbase; it needs to hear in clear and reasoned terms from the users who feel this as a betrayal. Ask Mozilla what it is going to do to actually solve the DRM problem that has created this false forced choice.
* **[Join our effort to stop EME approval][6] at the W3C**. While today's announcement makes it even more obvious that W3C rejection of EME will not stop its implementation, it also makes it clear that W3C can fearlessly reject EME to send a message that DRM is *not* a part of the vision of a free Web. * **Use a version of Firefox without the EME code**: Since its source code is available under a license allowing anyone to modify and redistribute it under a different name, we expect versions without EME to be made available, and you should use those instead. We will list them in the [Free Software Directory][7]. * **Donate to support the work of the [Free Software Foundation][8] and our [Defective by Design][9] campaign to actually end DRM.** Until it's completely gone, Mozilla and others will be constantly tempted to capitulate, and users will be pressured to continue using some proprietary software. If not us, give to another group fighting against digital restrictions." --- What is DRM? 2 https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2014/05/14/drm-and-the-challenge-of-serving-users/ https://hacks.mozilla.org/2014/05/reconciling-mozillas-mission-and-w3c-eme/ https://defectivebydesign.org/dbd-condemns-drm-in-html https://fsf.org/news/coalition-against-drm-in-html https://defectivebydesign.org/oscar-awarded-w3c-in-the-hollyweb
