* p_newsletters/libreplanet--- via libreplanet-discuss <libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org> [2022-05-12 22:42]: > I myself have been interested about freedom of software almost 15 > years. This interests me a lot and I found myself numerous times > spending plenty of hours in fsf.org just going deep in the rabbit > hole. However, this can't be expected from a "non-tech" user, a.k.a > the large part of the population, who indeed they'd be interested > about regaining freedom but are greeted with a comprehensive and > overwhelming amount of info.
Users who come to any website, may see just the peak of the iceberg of knowledge presented. That knowledge is comprehensive is rather good and speaks of quality. That knowledge may be overwhelming is understandable, as new words, terms, they may be the main obstacle in understanding any subject. If you wish to explain any page better of send suggestions, see on https://www.fsf.org/ website at the bottom how to contact FSF and tell them about it. If it is so or not, we can't really tell, as Your personal view is subjective, rather than objective. My subjective viewpoint is that FSF website was never overwhelming, it is comprehensive which I find positive, and I wish it would be more comprehensive. It is translated in many languages. That viewpoint is subjective shows the fact that there are so many contributors, members of the FSF, people who donate money. That is shown in the financial reports. It also shows that large number of people do understand messages conveyed through FSF website. Financial report is objective, it tells of the real world events, not just personal impressions. > I talk about fs to many of my peers and then I refer them to fsf.org > to learn more. The result, lack of engagement and retention from my > peers with the site. To me this isn't a problem of the user. That is generalization. When I have made examples how I talk to people, I have given two names and explained it. To how many people did you talk? Lack of engagement -- what would this mean? Not every person that you bring to any website will start engaging on the website neither in the projects website is offering. What kind of specific retention did you experience? Before any blame, let us first identify what exactly is the problem. Then if it is really a website problem, did you report it to webmaster of FSF? > My take is that, fsf.org conveys a lot of info, but not > effectively. Less is more, even in the education field. Notice that > I am not suggesting deleting info, but better summarize and display. Make your suggestions specific and report to webmasters. I can see the menu: About Campaigns Licensing Membership Resources Community Donate Shop Search =========================================================================== Is there anything wrong with the menu? How would you better summarize it please? Do you see on the bottom of every page full summary? How would you make the summary? > I think fsf.org could benefit from better UX design. Does UX means User Experience? Whatever it means, what is "better"? Can you propose specific improvements? > In contradiction with my text, for me the fsf's page is great. But > again, I am a tech-interested person and don't represent the larger > amount of internet users. I wish to see more constructive criticism, not just blaming on imaginary failures -- while in the same time we can read objective financial reports and that FSF functions just well. Every organization may improve. If you wish to propose improvements, do them. Provide the page that gives that what you want -- and propose to FSF those changes. When people develop Emacs Lisp they propose changes, patches, new programs, they may be accepted or rejected, but changes are pretty much specific. Try providing specific improvements or point out specifically to what you mean exactly. Try minimizing generalizations. Further, you are free to distribute information from FSF pages, you can make your own FSF-like page, look at licensing of pages, and provide the UX, and summaries in the way how you think it is good -- then let us know, let us review it, and propose it to FSF. Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns In support of Richard M. Stallman https://stallmansupport.org/ _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss