Hi, On 09/27/2012 11:23 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote: >> As a one last note, we should probably also rename the header file, etc, >> from libusb to libusbx for the 2.0 release. > > That is a good idea. > > Shall we just drop the "libusbx-2.0\libusbx.h" (libusb-1.0\libusb.h > in its current form) thingy and use libusbx2.h or things like that?
Thinking more about this, lets make it: libusbx-2.0\libusb.h So that apps can keep using "include <libusb.h>", I'm fine with making the library libusbx-2.0.so... and with the include dir being libusbx-2.0\libusbx.h But I assume we are going to keep calling all the functions / structs libusb_foo and not libusbx_foo, so lets do the same with the header. The reason for this, is that if we do this apps using libusbx can support building against both 1.0.x and 2.0.x with a minimal number of ifdefs, where as if we change all the libusb_foo to libusbx_foo ... Regards, Hans p.s. OTOH if we rename all the libusb_foo to libusbx_foo, we could do a a libusb1-compat.h which just #defines every libusb_foo to libusbx_foo, an advantage of this is that we can then add casts for parameter munging, etc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
