Hi, On 09/30/2012 02:04 AM, Chuck Cook wrote: > From my point of view. I would like to see libusb-1.0 go through > another iteration or two. Remove the dependency on WinUSB and the other > dlls. Get as many of the core functions working cross platform as > possible. > > We may eventually need to migrate to a 2.0 version. But I would rather > not see the developer fragmentation that dual paths would cause right now.
From my pov we want to solve this by making it easy to build against both libusbx-1.0 and libusbx-2.0 for a while. I'll be maintaining a porting guide on the wiki, and I expect it to be pretty short and simple. You can then even build against 1.0.x on Linux and 2.0.x on Windows for a while. Also I'll be maintaining the 1.0.x series for a while, but you should not expect many new features, like WinUSB independence to land there. Regards, Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j? http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
