Pirmin Braun scripsit:
> So I'd like to share our thoughts: Maybe it is possible to add such
> an extension to the OSI Open Source Definition? Or create a new class
> of approved liceneses?
Not gonna happen. We believe very strongly in non-discrimination among
licensees, and to disadvantage the millionaire is as unethical as to
disadvantage the poor.
> Or at least coin a name for this sort of license?
Feel free, but don't expect any of us to help much.
--
Let's face it: software is crap. Feature-laden and bloated, written under
tremendous time-pressure, often by incapable coders, using dangerous
languages and inadequate tools, trying to connect to heaps of broken or
obsolete protocols, implemented equally insufficiently, running on
unpredictable hardware -- we are all more than used to brokenness.
--Felix Winkelmann
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
