On 20/09/13 23:04, Pirmin Braun wrote:
Am Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:22:41 -0400
schrieb John Cowan <co...@mercury.ccil.org> :
Pirmin Braun scripsit:
So I'd like to share our thoughts: Maybe it is possible to add such
an extension to the OSI Open Source Definition? Or create a new class
of approved liceneses?
Not gonna happen. We believe very strongly in non-discrimination among
licensees, and to disadvantage the millionaire is as unethical as to
disadvantage the poor.
we're in the business world: The millionaire companies feel better to pay for
licences. It's not a disadvantage. They want to see, there is someone taking
care of the software they're using who makes a living from this money. There
are about 60 years of programming in IntarS (started at 1996) and it's easier
to just say price than trying to explain how this development was financed.
Because either there were non-paid just-for-fun programmers at work who may
turn away at any time or the professional services have to pay the bills.
Taking license fees just gives more credibility and trust.
Then have you ever thought about the allowed means of making money from Open
Source? Like selling copies? Strictly speaking, this is also a discrimination:
Someone having a slow internet connection or little knowledge of how to build a
product from the sources and having no friends that can help is forced to pay
money. Same with professional services: companies not having the IT stuff to do
it inhouse are discriminated! They have to hire Open Source contractors to help
them.
Hi Pirmin,
Lots of us make money from GPL open source. You have to find a business
model that works.
The problem you have is you are trying to impose a proprietary
product-centric business model on an open source product. Try a
different business model.
Jeremy
--
Tel: +44 (1590) 610184
Cell: +44 (7970) 676050
SkypeID: jeremybennett
Twitter: @jeremypbennett
Email: jeremy.benn...@embecosm.com
Web: www.embecosm.com
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
