I was hoping to generically support Servlet 3.0 continuations (which should
work for Jetty 7 and Glassfish). Please open a ticket for it.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Timothy Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu>wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
> I just wanted to rename this thread and raise this for proper
> discussion. API's between J6.x and J7.x appear to be the same, its
> mainly the package names and structure that have changed.
>
> Is it feasible to add a match statement to replace the current val
> assignments that have essentially hardcoded dependency on J6.x?
>
> There's some great stuff in Jetty 7 that would really help me (and
> lots of others) out....
>
> Cheers, Tim
>
> On Oct 5, 5:20 pm, Timothy Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu> wrote:
> > Id say that it would be easier to use a match statement as part of the
> > val assignment... The current code is just using reflection, so
> > factoring into a case statement shouldnt be too tough right?
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Cheers, Tim
> >
> > On 5 Oct 2009, at 16:48, Indrajit Raychaudhuri wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 05/10/09 5:29 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
> >
> > >> So I just wrote a Jetty 6 wrapper - getting the packaging working was
> > >> not ideal and not as flexible as Jetty 7 jetty-runner.
> >
> > > Yes, just took a look at jetty-runner. Feature wise, it's blows away
> > > the
> > > older mechanism man!
> >
> > >> Any thoughts in and around altering the lift code to adjust the
> > >> package based on jetty version?
> >
> > > I can think of two options basically:
> >
> > > 1. Move to jetty 7 and be done with it.
> >
> > > 2. Allowing user option (via -Djetty.version) during
> > > archetype:generate.
> > > jetty.version can be an overridable archetype property that defaults
> > > to
> > > (say 6) but user can do -Djetty.version=7.
> >
> > > Depending on the jetty version, the *.scala, *.xml etc. can be
> > > filtered
> > > to make the right kind of adjustment during archetype creation.
> >
> > > Cheers, Indrajit
> >
> > >> Cheers, Tim
> >
> > >> On Oct 5, 9:07 am, Timothy Perrett<timo...@getintheloop.eu> wrote:
> > >>> Indrajit,
> >
> > >>> Your right, jetty-runner is Jetty 7. The only tie we have to Jetty 6
> > >>> would be this line:
> >
> > >>> val cc = Class.forName
> > >>> ("org.mortbay.util.ajax.ContinuationSupport")
> >
> > >>> It would be trivial to add a match or whatever that determined the
> > >>> correct type to use... The question is, why haven't we done this
> > >>> already? I suspect its just a time / capacity issue but wanted to
> > >>> check.
> >
> > >>> I know I could write a jetty 6 wrapper, but that is my fallback
> > >>> position as something more OOTB would be preferable.
> >
> > >>> Cheers, Tim
> >
> > >>> On Oct 5, 8:29 am, Indrajit Raychaudhuri<indraj...@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> >
> > >>>> Tim,
> >
> > >>>> Interestingly, we are trying out something similar in a project
> > >>>> here and
> > >>>> this is absolutely cool stuff.
> >
> > >>>> In fact, Zimbra Desktop does this too. Pure Prism+Jetty bundled as
> > >>>> 'desktop application'.
> >
> > >>>> That you can have 'double-click' friendly application helps :-)
> >
> > >>>> Few notes:
> >
> > >>>> 1. Embedding Jetty server is super easy with
> > >>>> org.mortbay.jetty.Server.
> > >>>> Something that we have in Lift - well almost ;-) The RunWebApp in
> > >>>> the
> > >>>> archetypes are primitive use case of such. [1]
> >
> > >>>> 2. Jetty Runner is available only on Jetty 7.x series I think (not
> > >>>> certain). But yes, looks good either way.
> >
> > >>>> 3. Jetty has this clean and nice way of having web-app specific
> > >>>> jetty
> > >>>> config tucked inside the application (war or expanded) within
> > >>>> WEB-INF/jetty-web.xml which is basically an XmlConfiguration
> > >>>> instance
> > >>>> applied on the specific WebApplicationContext instead of the
> > >>>> Container
> > >>>> Context. [2]
> >
> > >>>> 4. An archetype that does self deploying is something that I have
> > >>>> on my
> > >>>> todo-list. Do you think this would make sense?
> >
> > >>>> 5. Maven assembly plugin would do. I haven't tried this myself, but
> > >>>> Maven shade plugin looks something close. [3]
> >
> > >>>> [1]http://docs.codehaus.org/display/JETTY/Embedding+Jetty
> > >>>> [2]http://docs.codehaus.org/display/JETTY/jetty-web.xml
> > >>>> [3]http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/
> >
> > >>>> Cheers, Indrajit
> >
> > >>>> NB: Looks like quite a few night owl here!
> >
> > >>>> On 05/10/09 4:11 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
> >
> > >>>>> Viktor, you and I should not be up this late on a sunday! ;-)
> >
> > >>>>> You have to see this:http://blogs.webtide.com/janb/entry/
> > >>>>> jetty_runner
> >
> > >>>>> Im going to hash this together as a maven assembly; if it works,
> > >>>>> then
> > >>>>> i'll write a blog and stuff it on the wiki... this could really
> > >>>>> make
> > >>>>> self deploying apps very nice indeed. I'll check with DavidB,
> > >>>>> but im
> > >>>>> fairly sure it would also be trivial to make a little maven plugin
> > >>>>> that builds a single JAR output...
> >
> > >>>>> Cheers, Tim
> >
> > >>>>> On Oct 4, 11:10 pm, Viktor Klang<viktor.kl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>> Thanks for the linky, mate!
> > >>>>>> Was a good read :)
> >
> > >>>>>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Timothy
> > >>>>>> Perrett<timo...@getintheloop.eu>wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>>> Just some more fuel for this debate:
> >
> > >>>>>>>http://technically.us/code/x/to-jettison-geronimo/
> >
> > >>>>>>> Cheers, Tim
> >
> > >>>>>>> On Oct 4, 8:46 pm, Timothy Perrett<timo...@getintheloop.eu>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> Guys,
> >
> > >>>>>>>> Of late i've been having several discussions with people
> > >>>>>>>> about how
> > >>>>>>>> theydeploythere lift apps... So, how do youdeployyours?
> >
> > >>>>>>>> Specifically, how are people managing multiple apps in one
> > >>>>>>>> install of
> > >>>>>>>> jetty? Or, alternatively, how are you embedded jetty so you
> > >>>>>>>> have an
> > >>>>>>>> executable JAR?
> >
> > >>>>>>>> Im using Winstone for apps that dont use Comet because the
> > >>>>>>>> package is
> > >>>>>>>> so slick (thanks DavidB), but now, I really really want to be
> > >>>>>>>> able to
> > >>>>>>>> embed jetty so I have an executable JAR in the same vein as
> > >>>>>>>> Winstone.
> >
> > >>>>>>>> As time moves on, I feel like this is more and more important
> > >>>>>>>> and we
> > >>>>>>>> dont current have a defined path for n00bs.
> >
> > >>>>>>>> Cheers, Tim
> >
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> Viktor Klang
> >
> > >>>>>> Blog: klangism.blogspot.com
> > >>>>>> Twttr: viktorklang
> >
> > >>>>>> Lift Committer - liftweb.com
> > >>>>>> AKKA Committer - akkasource.org
> > >>>>>> Cassidy - github.com/viktorklang/Cassidy.git
> > >>>>>> SoftPub founder:http://groups.google.com/group/softpub
> >
>
--
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Surf the harmonics
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
