Looks like you need to open a ticket for that :P
On Oct 8, 3:50 am, Timothy Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu> wrote:
> My point exactly!
>
> To that end, why dont we just add a small matching statement or switch
> that allows using Jetty 7 - only the package structure has changed not
> the continuation API itself so it should be fairly trivial. The jetty-
> runner stuff would really get me out of jetty-wrapper-hell that im in
> right now and would mean we could create an archetype that allows Lift
> apps to be deployable as a standalone JAR with jetty built in... would
> that not be über cool?
>
> Cheers, Tim
>
> On 7 Oct 2009, at 17:30, David Pollak wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Timothy Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu
> > > wrote:
>
> > I know that has been the plan - but I cant help but think that Servlet
> > 3.0 is still a long way off standardisation?
>
> > It's been 3 months away from being a standard for almost 2 years. ;-)
>
> > What do you think?
>
> > Cheers, Tim
>
> > On 7 Oct 2009, at 16:53, David Pollak wrote:
>
> > > I was hoping to generically support Servlet 3.0 continuations (which
> > > should work for Jetty 7 and Glassfish). Please open a ticket for
> > it.
>
> > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Timothy Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > Guys,
>
> > > I just wanted to rename this thread and raise this for proper
> > > discussion. API's between J6.x and J7.x appear to be the same, its
> > > mainly the package names and structure that have changed.
>
> > > Is it feasible to add a match statement to replace the current val
> > > assignments that have essentially hardcoded dependency on J6.x?
>
> > > There's some great stuff in Jetty 7 that would really help me (and
> > > lots of others) out....
>
> > > Cheers, Tim
>
> > > On Oct 5, 5:20 pm, Timothy Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu> wrote:
> > > > Id say that it would be easier to use a match statement as part of
> > > the
> > > > val assignment... The current code is just using reflection, so
> > > > factoring into a case statement shouldnt be too tough right?
>
> > > > Thoughts?
>
> > > > Cheers, Tim
>
> > > > On 5 Oct 2009, at 16:48, Indrajit Raychaudhuri wrote:
>
> > > > > On 05/10/09 5:29 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
>
> > > > >> So I just wrote a Jetty 6 wrapper - getting the packaging
> > > working was
> > > > >> not ideal and not as flexible as Jetty 7 jetty-runner.
>
> > > > > Yes, just took a look at jetty-runner. Feature wise, it's blows
> > > away
> > > > > the
> > > > > older mechanism man!
>
> > > > >> Any thoughts in and around altering the lift code to adjust the
> > > > >> package based on jetty version?
>
> > > > > I can think of two options basically:
>
> > > > > 1. Move to jetty 7 and be done with it.
>
> > > > > 2. Allowing user option (via -Djetty.version) during
> > > > > archetype:generate.
> > > > > jetty.version can be an overridable archetype property that
> > > defaults
> > > > > to
> > > > > (say 6) but user can do -Djetty.version=7.
>
> > > > > Depending on the jetty version, the *.scala, *.xml etc. can be
> > > > > filtered
> > > > > to make the right kind of adjustment during archetype creation.
>
> > > > > Cheers, Indrajit
>
> > > > >> Cheers, Tim
>
> > > > >> On Oct 5, 9:07 am, Timothy Perrett<timo...@getintheloop.eu>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>> Indrajit,
>
> > > > >>> Your right, jetty-runner is Jetty 7. The only tie we have to
> > > Jetty 6
> > > > >>> would be this line:
>
> > > > >>> val cc = Class.forName
> > > > >>> ("org.mortbay.util.ajax.ContinuationSupport")
>
> > > > >>> It would be trivial to add a match or whatever that determined
> > > the
> > > > >>> correct type to use... The question is, why haven't we done
> > this
> > > > >>> already? I suspect its just a time / capacity issue but wanted
> > > to
> > > > >>> check.
>
> > > > >>> I know I could write a jetty 6 wrapper, but that is my
> > fallback
> > > > >>> position as something more OOTB would be preferable.
>
> > > > >>> Cheers, Tim
>
> > > > >>> On Oct 5, 8:29 am, Indrajit Raychaudhuri<indraj...@gmail.com>
> > > > >>> wrote:
>
> > > > >>>> Tim,
>
> > > > >>>> Interestingly, we are trying out something similar in a
> > project
> > > > >>>> here and
> > > > >>>> this is absolutely cool stuff.
>
> > > > >>>> In fact, Zimbra Desktop does this too. Pure Prism+Jetty
> > > bundled as
> > > > >>>> 'desktop application'.
>
> > > > >>>> That you can have 'double-click' friendly application
> > helps :-)
>
> > > > >>>> Few notes:
>
> > > > >>>> 1. Embedding Jetty server is super easy with
> > > > >>>> org.mortbay.jetty.Server.
> > > > >>>> Something that we have in Lift - well almost ;-) The
> > > RunWebApp in
> > > > >>>> the
> > > > >>>> archetypes are primitive use case of such. [1]
>
> > > > >>>> 2. Jetty Runner is available only on Jetty 7.x series I think
> > > (not
> > > > >>>> certain). But yes, looks good either way.
>
> > > > >>>> 3. Jetty has this clean and nice way of having web-app
> > specific
> > > > >>>> jetty
> > > > >>>> config tucked inside the application (war or expanded) within
> > > > >>>> WEB-INF/jetty-web.xml which is basically an XmlConfiguration
> > > > >>>> instance
> > > > >>>> applied on the specific WebApplicationContext instead of the
> > > > >>>> Container
> > > > >>>> Context. [2]
>
> > > > >>>> 4. An archetype that does self deploying is something that I
> > > have
> > > > >>>> on my
> > > > >>>> todo-list. Do you think this would make sense?
>
> > > > >>>> 5. Maven assembly plugin would do. I haven't tried this
> > > myself, but
> > > > >>>> Maven shade plugin looks something close. [3]
>
> > > > >>>> [1]http://docs.codehaus.org/display/JETTY/Embedding+Jetty
> > > > >>>> [2]http://docs.codehaus.org/display/JETTY/jetty-web.xml
> > > > >>>> [3]http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/
>
> > > > >>>> Cheers, Indrajit
>
> > > > >>>> NB: Looks like quite a few night owl here!
>
> > > > >>>> On 05/10/09 4:11 AM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
>
> > > > >>>>> Viktor, you and I should not be up this late on a
> > sunday! ;-)
>
> > > > >>>>> You have to see this:http://blogs.webtide.com/janb/entry/
> > > > >>>>> jetty_runner
>
> > > > >>>>> Im going to hash this together as a maven assembly; if it
> > > works,
> > > > >>>>> then
> > > > >>>>> i'll write a blog and stuff it on the wiki... this could
> > > really
> > > > >>>>> make
> > > > >>>>> self deploying apps very nice indeed. I'll check with
> > DavidB,
> > > > >>>>> but im
> > > > >>>>> fairly sure it would also be trivial to make a little maven
> > > plugin
> > > > >>>>> that builds a single JAR output...
>
> > > > >>>>> Cheers, Tim
>
> > > > >>>>> On Oct 4, 11:10 pm, Viktor Klang<viktor.kl...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>>>>> Thanks for the linky, mate!
> > > > >>>>>> Was a good read :)
>
> > > > >>>>>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Timothy
> > > > >>>>>> Perrett<timo...@getintheloop.eu>wrote:
>
> > > > >>>>>>> Just some more fuel for this debate:
>
> > > > >>>>>>>http://technically.us/code/x/to-jettison-geronimo/
>
> > > > >>>>>>> Cheers, Tim
>
> > > > >>>>>>> On Oct 4, 8:46 pm, Timothy
> > Perrett<timo...@getintheloop.eu>
> > > > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>> Guys,
>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Of late i've been having several discussions with people
> > > > >>>>>>>> about how
> > > > >>>>>>>> theydeploythere lift apps... So, how do youdeployyours?
>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Specifically, how are people managing multiple apps in
> > one
> > > > >>>>>>>> install of
> > > > >>>>>>>> jetty? Or, alternatively, how are you embedded jetty so
> > you
> > > > >>>>>>>> have an
> > > > >>>>>>>> executable JAR?
>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Im using Winstone for apps that dont use Comet because
> > the
> > > > >>>>>>>> package is
> > > > >>>>>>>> so slick (thanks DavidB), but now, I really really want
> > > to be
> > > > >>>>>>>> able to
> > > > >>>>>>>> embed jetty so I have an executable JAR in the same
> > vein as
> > > > >>>>>>>> Winstone.
>
> > > > >>>>>>>> As time moves on, I feel like this is more and more
> > > important
> > > > >>>>>>>> and we
> > > > >>>>>>>> dont current have a defined path for n00bs.
>
> > > > >>>>>>>> Cheers, Tim
>
> > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>> Viktor Klang
>
> > > > >>>>>> Blog: klangism.blogspot.com
> > > > >>>>>> Twttr: viktorklang
>
> > > > >>>>>> Lift Committer - liftweb.com
> > > > >>>>>> AKKA Committer - akkasource.org
> > > > >>>>>> Cassidy - github.com/viktorklang/Cassidy.git
> > > > >>>>>> SoftPub founder:http://groups.google.com/group/softpub
>
> > > --
> > > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
> > > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> > > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
> > > Surf the harmonics
>
> > --
> > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
> > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
> > Surf the harmonics
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
