On 8 October 2010 09:14, Mark Polesky <markpole...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > [...] > > This leaves: > > CURRENT NAME PROPOSED NAME > ------------ ------------- > top-system top-system (no change) > top-title top-markup > between-title markup-markup > after-title markup-score > between-system system-system > before-title score-markup > bottom-system system-bottom > between-scores-system score-score
I'm sorry to come come a day after the fair, but I truly dislike the new proposed names. What was wrong with the previous ones? I find all these "markup-something" or "something-markup" names very confusing. We have markups everywhere : we use the \markup command for TextScripts, which are _inside_ the score, we can use \mark \markup ... or even \tempo \markup ... We can even have \score blocks inside a \markup . These vertical system variables are usually somewhat related to "titles" (due to a \header block), even if sometimes it is not really a "header title", but simply a markup. But even in this case this markup usually play in a certain way as a title. The previous names were quite easy to understand (although it was a bit difficult due to the large number of such variables) but I don't catch at first sight the meaning of the new proposed ones... Cheers, Xavier -- Xavier Scheuer <x.sche...@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel