Mark Polesky <markpole...@yahoo.com> writes: > (Carl et al.: please read at least the last paragraph!) > > Xavier Scheuer wrote: >> The previous names were quite easy to understand (although >> it was a bit difficult due to the large number of such >> variables) but I don't catch at first sight the meaning of >> the new proposed ones... > > Well, in the new docs I would certainly mention the general > format: > > item1-item2-spacing > > I would also mention that the use of the word "markup" in > these variable names only refers to top-level markups and > titles. > > Would knowing this in advance make you feel differently or > do you still not like the proposed names?
They sound systematic enough to obliterate them. Namely use an interface like spacing markup markup = 3cm spacing score markup = ... In other words: I like the systematics better than the resulting identifiers. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
