On 10/9/10 10:52 AM, "Joe Neeman" <joenee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote:
>> On 10/9/10 9:46 AM, "Mark Polesky" <markpole...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> * * * * * * * * * *
>>>>
>>>> "before-title-spacing" applies to these cases:
>>>> 1) from last system in a score to top-level markup.
>>>> 2) from last system of one score to scoreTitleMarkup of
>>>> another score.
>>>>
>>>> Within the proposed naming scheme, the 2 choices for
>>>> before-title-spacing are:
>>>> system-markup-spacing
>>>> score-markup-spacing
>>>>
>>>> Carl likes "score-markup-spacing" for at least 2 reasons:
>>>> 1) the upper attachment point is always the end of a score.
>>>> 2) "system-markup" suggests that it should work within a
>>>> single score, and it doesn't.
>>>>
>>>> I've gone back and forth, but now I'm in favor of
>>>> "system-markup-spacing" for the following reasons:
>>>> 1) it complements "markup-system-spacing" which is easier
>>>> to remember.
>>
>> I don't agree with this rationale. markup-system-spacing is chosen
>> because the markup can be either inside the score of which the system
>> is a part
>
> Really? How does that happen?
If the markup is a bookTitleMarkup or a top-level markup it's outside of the
score.
If it's a scoreTitleMarkup, it's inside of the score.
At least, this is the way that Mark identified it.
Thanks,
Carl
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel