The point isn't what symbols to use (designing them isn't so difficult), but how to represent them internally. If we change that, we will break a lot Scheme and C++ code. That is is inevitable, but I'd rather get it right for once and for all.
I think what you suggested must be sufficient, for I don't think people will start asking about 1/3 sharps and/or 3/5 flats, but that is because I don't believe these kinds of accidentals exist.
Thorkil
PS: I updated the pages to which I referred to in my previous mail, so for those interested, here comes the link:
http://members.home.nl/wolvendans/
_______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
