On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 13:53:56 +0200 Thorkil Wolvendans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think what you suggested must be sufficient, for I don't think > people will start asking about 1/3 sharps and/or 3/5 flats, but that > is because I don't believe these kinds of accidentals exist. Actually, the definition of an arbitrary sharp or flat is quite easy: frequency = 2^(8 + (steps above middle C + fractional sharp)/12) e.g. Middle C = 256Hz, middle C 1/3 sharp = 261Hz I suspect that western trained ears find it somewhat unpleasant in most cases. -- njh _______________________________________________ Lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
