On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:08:19 -0400, James Westby <james.wes...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:03:16 +0200, Alexander Sack <a...@linaro.org> wrote: > > Sure: with this change we can produce our images without any kernel > > whatsoever (e.g. as those are coming from hwpacks). > > Ok, we're back to this again. I still haven't heard any convincing > arguments for why that is a good idea. Could you please tell me why you > think we should do that?
Talking to Alexander he gave some good reasons to do this eventually, basically boiling down to it being a waste when we have hwpacks. We agreed that we should have hwpacks that we know work ok before doing this though. Therefore the timeline is: * Make hwpacks available * Keep omap3, vexpress, etc. headless images * Drop linux flavours from all the other images * Make linaro-media-create etc. work well with hwpacks * If we are happy then drop the flavours from headless too Thanks, James _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
