> On Jun 18, 2015, at 6:41 PM, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pi...@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2015, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 18-06-2015 11:26, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>> On Thu, 18 Jun 2015, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 18-06-2015 05:44, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>>>>>> On Jun 17, 2015, at 3:15 AM, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pi...@linaro.org> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, 4 Jun 2015, Jim Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The normal toolchain process is that patches get added to our releases
>>>>>>> only if they are already upstream.  Our releases are FSF releases plus
>>>>>>> patches backported from mainline, with no local changes except when
>>>>>>> absolutely unavoidable.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It is commit 451133cefa upstream.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please consider merging for the next toolchain release.  I don't expect 
>>>>>> major conflicts if any.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Adhemerval,
>>>>> 
>>>>> FAOD, are you planning to merge this feature into linaro's 2.25 or 2.24 
>>>>> branch?
>>>>> 
>>>>> My [very light] preference is to merge it to 2.25, but not 2.24.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Do we need it to 2.24? Is this patch preventing current kernel builds for 
>>>> older
>>>> binutils releases?
>>> 
>>> Current kernels are fine without it.  My work on kernel tinification 
>>> requires it though.  Depending on when this work will be ready for wider 
>>> consumption, it would be nice if our binutils already carried the 
>>> necessary support.
>>> 
>>> I don't know what the 2.24 vs 2.25 release timeline is, but if 2.25 is 
>>> released, say, before next Connect then it should be good enough.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> Binutils 2.24 was officially released 2013/12 and Binutils 2.25 at 2014/12.
>> Current distros uses versions from 2.23 (RHEL7/CentOS7), 2.24 (Ubuntu 14),
>> or 2.25 (Debian Jessie) and I think next Linaro toolchain will use 2.25.
>> I would prefer to focus on 2.25, since 2.24 is reaching two years old, 
>> however
>> since this modification seems to be very constrained, I do not see much work
>> being required to backport to 2.24.
> 
> Well... All I really care about is for this patch to be available in 
> next Linaro toolchain release, or next month's.  The actual version 
> number is immaterial to me.

Let's stick with 2.25 then.  It should be released within 1-2 month timeframe.

--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
www.linaro.org

_______________________________________________
linaro-toolchain mailing list
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain

Reply via email to