I personally find Dennis’ contributions to be thoughtful, articulate, 
well-supported and respectful.  He spends a great deal of time on them, which I 
respect and appreciate.  I enjoy reading his notes, and if I don’t wish to, I 
also simply move along.  

His views are sometimes unpopular, but in many “conversations” he’s the only 
person pushing a counter-narrative. And a lot of times he’s correct.

Candidly I’ve noticed this trend myself — those with a more conservative or 
fundamentally different view simply seem to disengage from this forum.  In a 
town that purports to celebrate and cultivate diversity, it feels to me that we 
should be welcoming Dennis’ contributions. 

I hope he’ll reconsider his participation

Seth Rosen


> On Mar 31, 2022, at 6:27 PM, V Saleme <bmwkbi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Very well stated Richard. A slippery slope has been woven.
> 
> Vic 
> 
>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 5:52 PM Richard Panetta <richardpane...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> Dennis,
>> 
>> When I saw this email I was miffed as to why you would have been put on 
>> moderation as your posted are always well thought out,  thorough (sometimes 
>> too thorough), always given links to your sources. I and many others have 
>> found you comments informative. There was maybe one instance when you and 
>> another former Selectman went back and forth similar to this yet neither of 
>> you were put on moderation 
>> 
>> There were many responses stating they enjoyed the back and forth. Neither 
>> one of you were rude or disrespectful of each other so who knows. 
>> 
>> It would be a shame to lose your posts on subjects and the time and care you 
>> put into topics you comment on. I hope you take some time and decide to 
>> comeback and offer your thoughts to important topics. 
>> 
>> 
>> I too have noticed that an opposing view gets treated differently so I can 
>> not blame you for feeling frustrated. Perhaps some management here have gone 
>> “nose deaf” to their friends and opinions they agree with. But as you said 
>> it is their sandbox and they may do as they wish. Hopefully you won’t mind 
>> jumping back in said sandbox and getting a little dirty again 
>> 
>> Best wishes
>> 
>> Rich 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 1:20 PM Dennis Liu <bigheadden...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Howdy, folks – this email is going out to Lincolntalk, but also to some 
>>> local friends (and the Lincolntalk moderators: Margit, Jena and Jonathan) 
>>> directly, since I have been put into the moderation queue so I am unsure if 
>>> anyone will see this.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> With the back-and-forth with Paul Shorb regarding the proposed new laws 
>>> affecting construction in Lincoln and climate change, I seem to have 
>>> violated one or more tenets of the Lincoln Talk rules and policies 
>>> (https://www.lincolntalk.org/rules-and-policies).
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> I made my last post on the topic last night, only to discover that I had 
>>> been put into moderation without warning.  (N.b., since I replied to Paul 
>>> directly, and he replied to the List this morning, you may have seen 
>>> indirectly my last post, since the moderators apparently only put me on 
>>> moderation and not him; if any of you is curious about how I left it, you 
>>> can read Paul’s message, or feel free to reach out to me and I will forward 
>>> it privately; Paul’s message in the archive is here:  
>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/2022-March/043133.html)
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> For the avoidance of doubt:  since, of course, Lincoln Talk is a private 
>>> (and free/not-for-profit) operation kindly maintained and paid for by the 
>>> moderators, they are entirely free to decide what and who gets circulated.  
>>> That’s their call, and I respect that.  I suspect that my postings have 
>>> triggered a reaction among one or more folks (or directly among one or more 
>>> of the moderators), and I have been found in breach of those rules and 
>>> policies. 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Fair enough!  I know that I am in the minority (or very small) minority on 
>>> a lot of these topics in Lincoln – that’s fine, I’ve been in the minority 
>>> pretty much my entire life living in New England, so I’m used to it, lol.  
>>> I do hope, however, that my writings have not been construed as personal 
>>> attacks, and instead considered an attempt to shed light and bring a 
>>> non-conforming, contrarian view to this town.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> But since this is not the first time, I shall be refraining from making any 
>>> more posts to Lincoln Talk.  I don’t wish to waste my time writing stuff 
>>> up, and I certainly do not wish to cause offense among my neighbors.  I’m 
>>> writing this note just so you all will know why you wouldn’t have heard 
>>> from me in the future.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Onwards!
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Vty,
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> --Dennis
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
>> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
>> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
>> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
>> Change your subscription settings at 
>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
>> 
> -- 
> The LincolnTalk mailing list.
> To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
> Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
> Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
> Change your subscription settings at 
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
> 
-- 
The LincolnTalk mailing list.
To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org.
Search the archives at http://lincoln.2330058.n4.nabble.com/.
Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/.
Change your subscription settings at 
https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.

Reply via email to