Last week’s SOTT was a great place to collect information. Each presentation was extremely well done. Much of what we heard last week was new and provocative (in a good way).
What was sadly missing was a chance tor really discuss-to ask questions & make comments-to hear each other and not just the presenters (who were excellent!). It is like we need another SOTT to discuss what we aer still trying to digest from last week. The original intent of SOTT was to do just that-to hear each other out and to be able to communicate our questions and concerns with our representatives as they shaped policy and budget. We were all in one space-the Donaldson Auditorium-questioning, debating, discussing. We were there to provide feedback BEFORE things were set in stone, and to have what was brought to us at Town Meeting to reflect our feedback. It is that piece that is missing. I don’t know if there is a mechanism to press a “pause” button and create a community forum to discuss and debate what we have just been presented. We now have what boards, committee and commissions are contemplating-they did a fantastic job. It is now our turn to have a role in shaping what his to come before us for a vote. We have important issues before us that will have the potential to shape the physical and social landscape for generations to come. We need to be very, very thoughtful as we move forward. ------ Sara Mattes > On Oct 7, 2023, at 4:27 PM, Mark Levinson <m...@voxmediaconsulting.com> wrote: > > As Bob Domnitz points out in his email yesterday (see below), the Housing > Choice Act Working Group (HCAWG), together with the Planning Board, is set to > approve a single option for the town’s response to the HCA at their meeting > on Tuesday. That option concentrates all the rezoning for high-density > housing to the Lincoln Station neighborhood. I believe it will be a mistake > and a disservice to the town to act so soon after their plan was presented at > SOTT last weekend, and to limit the town’s choices so severely at this point > in time. > > Earlier this year, the HCAWG was considering three options, all of which > would have put some of the HCA-required rezoning at existing multi-family > developments in North Lincoln. As Bob notes, the HCA allows the town > essentially to get credit for existing multi-family development by allowing > rezoning those areas to higher density, even though it’s very unlikely they > will actually get redeveloped in the foreseeable future. However, a recent > rule change by the state allowed counting the Mall within the HCA > requirements, so it became possible to put all the total rezoned area at > Lincoln Station. > > In the SOTT last Saturday, HCAWG presented three new options: one with all > the rezoning at Lincoln Station only, and another two which included some > rezoning at existing multi-family developments in North Lincoln, as before. > However, these two additional options had the SAME EXACT areas to be rezoned > near Lincoln Station as the first option, but included EXTRA rezoning in > North Lincoln, more than would be required by HCA. Since these latter > options make very little sense, it was no surprise that the majority > sentiment expressed at SOTT was in favor of the first LS-only option. > > I urge everyone to consider the effects of putting all the HCA-required > high-density housing only at Lincoln Station. I don’t see any reason why the > town couldn’t submit more than one plan to the state for approval, including > another option that that would meet HCA requirements with less rezoned > density near Lincoln Station together with some rezoning in North Lincoln. > That would give the town time to consider the consequences of each before any > approval at Town Meeting. > > I urge you to get involved and make your voice heard by HCAWG and the > Planning Board before this Tuesday’s meeting. > > Thank you. > > Mark Levinson > > > From: Robert Domnitz <bobdom...@hotmail.com <mailto:bobdom...@hotmail.com>> > Sent: Friday, October 6, 2023 1:30 PM > To: lincoln@lincolntalk.org <mailto:lincoln@lincolntalk.org> > Subject: [LincolnTalk] Thoughts on the Housing Choice Act and the October > 10th Multi-Board Meeting > > As a recently-retired member of the Planning Board and Housing Choice Act > Working Group, I am concerned that the three options presented last Saturday > at the SOTT - and the plan to choose just one of those options at a > multi-board meeting on October 10th - will restrict Town Meeting to merely > rubber-stamping the HCAWG's decision. And the HCAWG's decision will reflect > its embedded priorities that may differ from what town meeting would choose > if we are given more options. I therefore think it is crucial for the HCAWG > to submit several options to the state for advisory opinions prior to Town > Meeting. All options should be presented to Town Meeting for debate and vote. > > > I'd like to expand on some of the points made - and some of the points > omitted - by the presenters at last Saturday's SOTT meeting. > > > 1. About 35% of the town's residences are currently multi-family (not > including Hanscom Field, see list below). Most folks are surprised when they > hear this. Lincoln has done an outstanding job allowing multi-family living > while maintaining our rural character. With full build-out under the HCA, > multi-family housing will approach 50% of the town's inventory. > > > 2. State guidelines for the HCA provide a mechanism for towns to get credit > for existing multifamily housing. Towns are free to locate HCA-compliant > subdistricts in areas that currently have high residential density. These > subdistricts will help us meet our "quota," even though it is very unlikely > these areas will be redeveloped. > > > 3. An evaluation of the various options requires consideration of the > likelihood that redevelopment will actually occur.Existing condo developments > would require consent of the owners to redevelop, with the particular > procedures laid out in the condominiums' organizational documents. If condo > owners don't want redevelopment to happen, it won't happen. Existing > apartment buildings (e.g., Oriole Landing) owned by a single entity would > only require a decision by that entity and would depend on their analysis of > whether an increase in density would justify the cost of redevelopment. On > the other hand, rezoning single family homes on Codman Road as shown in > options A,B, and C from the HCAWG would likely result in rapid redevelopment, > as owners on Codman Road take advantage of the jump in value that would > result from the increase in development potential. > > > 4. State guidelines require that only 20% of the HCA-compliant district be > located in the vicinity of the commuter rail station. The other 80% can be > anywhere in town. However, the HCAWG eliminated consideration of the Farrar > Pond and Lincoln Ridge condos as "too far from any amenities and public > transit." See link below to p. 17 of SOTT slide deck. This area could be used > as part of our plan for compliance; the HCAWG's decision to eliminate > consideration of this area reflects their prioritization of access to public > transit and goes beyond what the state requires. Similarly, the > Commons/Oriole Landing area was removed from consideration by the HCAWG > because it is "not walkable to any public transit or public amenities." See > p. 20 of SOTT slide deck. Instead, the HCAWG has proposed placing 100% of the > district in Lincoln Station (option C) or adding to option C additional > subdistricts in North Lincoln so that the total development potential greatly > exceeds what is necessary for compliance. > > > 5. The HCAWG should consider other ways of splitting the HCA district. The > current option C fully complies with the HCA by allowing development only > within the Lincoln Station area. If compliance with state law is our > objective, options A and B are less appealing because they needlessly add to > option C more development potential elsewhere in town. Among the three > options, C is the obvious choice for most residents because it minimally > complies with the HCA. But the Town deserves a chance to vote on other > options that do not exceed the HCA's requirements. Three options that would > make sense are: > > > - Place the entire district at Lincoln Station (current option C) > - Place most of the district at Lincoln Station and some of the district > elsewhere. > - Place some of the district at Lincoln Station and most of the district > elsewhere. > > > For all options, the details should be worked out for minimal compliance with > the HCA, giving Lincoln residents maximum control over future land use > decisions. It's worth noting that the HCA does allow, on a discretionary > basis, subdistrict boundaries that do not match parcel boundaries. This may > provide the Town with additional flexibility it needs to comply with, but not > exceed, the HCA's requirements. > > > Residents deserve a meaningful, democratic chance to choose the level of > development they want in the Lincoln Station area. Due to the limited set of > options that were presented, I don't think the survey taken at the SOTT is a > good indicator of the will of the town. Surprisingly, the HCAWG did not > propose an option where some development allowed elsewhere in Town is used to > reduce the development allowed at Lincoln Station. All three of their options > allow more than 400 units of additional development in the Lincoln Station > area. That is an extreme increase compared to what currently exists in the > area. See p. 40 of SOTT slide deck. > > > My goal in writing this post is to encourage the HCAWG to give our Town > Meeting the respect and deference to which it is entitled. This is a hugely > important matter for the Town and we can move forward together only if Town > Meeting has a meaningful role as the decisionmaker. Please attend the October > 10th multi-board meeting to share your thoughts. > > > Best regards to all, > Bob Domnitz > > > SOTT slide deck: Follow link found in > https://www.lincolntown.org/1327/Housing-Choice-Act-Working-Group > Existing multifamily housing in Lincoln (not including Hanscom housing): > > The Commons > Oriole Landing > Battle Road Farms > Minuteman Commons > Lincoln Woods > Greenridge Condos > "Flying Nun" apartments > Ridge Road apartments > Ridge Road Condos > Todd Pond Condos > Farrar Pond Condos > Lincoln Ridge Condos > Ryan Estate > Accessory Apartments in Single Family Homes > Miscellaneous (Scattered sites under Housing Comm.) > > -- > The LincolnTalk mailing list. > To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org > <mailto:Lincoln@lincolntalk.org>. > Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. > Change your subscription settings at > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln. >
-- The LincolnTalk mailing list. To post, send mail to Lincoln@lincolntalk.org. Browse the archives at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/private/lincoln/. Change your subscription settings at https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/lincoln.
