>>Less difference than you're saying! I was talking microseconds.
>>Your best case was 16 milliseconds for 1000 tests, and the
>>all-in-one was 44 milliseconds for 1000 tests. That's a difference
>>per test of only 28 millionths of a second, or about a 40th of a
>>millisecond.
>
>Whoa--hold on. A millisecond is 1/1000 of a second, no? Comes from
>the Latin word for 1,000. A microsecond is a millionth of a second.
>Methinks you may be standing on your head ;-)
Don't think I am, that's the kind of thing I would notice. It would
be harder to type e-mails for a start.
1000 tests that take a total of 28 milliseconds (the difference
between your best and worst times) means that one of those tests is
taking 28 microseconds, or 1/36th of a millisecond.
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
