>DOM?? Document Object Modeling??? For what kind of use??? Sorry my poor >knowledge but, lingo is not OOPS for itself?? Huh? Of course it is. Lingo's parent scripts, behaviors and child objects, with their properties and "methods" are all about OOP. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Christopher Watson Sr. Software Engineer Lightspan, Inc. http://www.lightspan.com/ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
- <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Watson, Christopher
- Re: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Colin Holgate
- Re: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Rodrigo Peres
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Mark R. Jonkman
- Re: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? R. Bhakti Klein
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Watson, Christopher
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Jakob Hede Madsen
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Roy Pardi
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Boyd Speer
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Watson, Christopher
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Watson, Christopher
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Watson, Christopher
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? jonathan
- Re: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Lord LePhuronn
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Watson, Christopher
- Re: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? LePhuronn
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Watson, Christopher
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Kerry Thompson
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? jonathan
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Kerry Thompson