The mind starts to boggle (at the potential) - such an API would be very usefull indeed... Tell us more! -Boyd Speer Touchstone Digital Design At 11:32 PM 3/14/01 -0500, you wrote: >At 1:46 PM -0800 3/14/2001, Watson, Christopher wrote: >>Obviously, there's a lot more to the DOM, and implementing it, than this. I >>don't want to burn bandwidth by providing a comprehensive overview. I'm sure [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
- <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Watson, Christopher
- Re: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Colin Holgate
- Re: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Rodrigo Peres
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Mark R. Jonkman
- Re: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? R. Bhakti Klein
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Watson, Christopher
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Jakob Hede Madsen
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Roy Pardi
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Boyd Speer
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Watson, Christopher
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Watson, Christopher
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Watson, Christopher
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? jonathan
- Re: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Lord LePhuronn
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Watson, Christopher
- Re: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? LePhuronn
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Watson, Christopher
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? Kerry Thompson
- RE: <lingo-l> DOM, Anyone? jonathan