>Don't think that a Lingo DOM would be as clean though
>as a lot of properties inter-relate to each other, for example
>"Member" can be an object in and of itself complete with
>properties (rect, regPoint, etc), yet "Sprite" has a member
>property that would call back to the "Member" object.
Actually, my DOM implementation is completely Lingo-based, and has no
linkage to the member/sprite/stage metaphors, or the Lingo that supports
them. In simple terms, this DOM implementation is all about creating
well-formed XML/HTML/XHTML documents in memory, then outputting views of
them.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Christopher Watson
Sr. Software Engineer
Lightspan, Inc.
http://www.lightspan.com/
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list,
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
