At 13:43 -0400 2001_08_17, Al Hospers wrote: > > But an essential focus of the original discussion was about *not* >> using "getters" ie. data requisition methods. >> >> I may spawn confusion with some misinterpretation, I'm just trying >to >> understand the article. > > I recommend reading the article. > >could you please post the link to it so I can do so Jakob. obviously I >am missing that piece here. <http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-07-1999/jw-07-toolbox_p.html> Should read it again myself, but time... Jakob [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Jakob Hede Madsen
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Al Hospers
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Colin Kettenacker
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Karina Steffens
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Al Hospers
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Karina Steffens
- Re: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Pete Carss
- Re: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Rob Romanek
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Jakob Hede Madsen
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Al Hospers
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Jakob Hede Madsen
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Al Hospers
- <lingo-l> shortcut on desktop Mark
- Re: <lingo-l> shortcut on desktop grimmwerks
- RE: <lingo-l> shortcut on desktop Al Hospers
- Re: <lingo-l> shortcut on desktop Mark A. Boyd
- RE: <lingo-l> shortcut on desktop Al Hospers
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Irv Kalb
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Al Hospers
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Irv Kalb
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Al Hospers