> Not sure what you mean about not writing a file to the target > machine, as > creating a shortcut IS a file....but you could look to budapi. 1 - FWIW - shortcuts & alisaes are NOT text files. 2 - you can't do it without writing a file to the user's computer, with or without an Xtra. hth Al Hospers CamberSoft, Inc. al<at>cambersoft<dot>com http://www.cambersoft.com Shockwave and Director development, Lingo programming, CGI scripting. A famous linguist once said: "There is no language wherein a double positive can form a negative." YEAH, RIGHT [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Al Hospers
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Karina Steffens
- Re: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Pete Carss
- Re: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Rob Romanek
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Jakob Hede Madsen
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Al Hospers
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Jakob Hede Madsen
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Al Hospers
- <lingo-l> shortcut on desktop Mark
- Re: <lingo-l> shortcut on desktop grimmwerks
- Re: <lingo-l> shortcut on desktop Al Hospers
- Re: <lingo-l> shortcut on desktop Mark A. Boyd
- RE: <lingo-l> shortcut on desktop Al Hospers
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Irv Kalb
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Al Hospers
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Irv Kalb
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Al Hospers
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Jakob Hede Madsen
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Al Hospers
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Jakob Hede Madsen
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Colin Kettenacker