> >if you end up putting the slider code inside the > >QTBehavior it starts to become almost like procedural code. you have > >this large bunch of code that becomes difficult to maintain > & that has > >everything in it including the kitchen sink. what is the point? > > Exactly! What is the point? > Where did compartmentalization go? so I guess I just don't get the point of the article. Al Hospers CamberSoft, Inc. al<at>cambersoft<dot>com http://www.cambersoft.com Shockwave and Director development, Lingo programming, CGI scripting. A famous linguist once said: "There is no language wherein a double positive can form a negative." YEAH, RIGHT [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/LUJ/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
- <lingo-l> shortcut on desktop Mark
- Re: <lingo-l> shortcut on desktop grimmwerks
- RE: <lingo-l> shortcut on desktop Al Hospers
- Re: <lingo-l> shortcut on desktop Mark A. Boyd
- RE: <lingo-l> shortcut on desktop Al Hospers
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Irv Kalb
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Al Hospers
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Irv Kalb
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Al Hospers
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Jakob Hede Madsen
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Al Hospers
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Jakob Hede Madsen
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Colin Kettenacker
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Al Hospers
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Jakob Hede Madsen
- <lingo-l> how to reverse and fastforward flash mov... Kavitha Raya
- RE: <lingo-l> how to reverse and fastforward flash... Leon McComish
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Jakob Hede Madsen
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Ken Prat
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Colin Kettenacker
- RE: <lingo-l> OOP and ancestor access Al Hospers