What about /lib (and particularly /lib/modules)?  You can't just switch kernels 
without having the corresponding modules available.

Not to mention /var, and all of the RPM database stuff.

Splitting off /boot seems to be mainly a relic from the days when Linux wouldn't boot 
if the root filesystem was bigger than 500mb. (or whatever) on Intel boxen.  I haven't 
seen a good reason to do it
for a long time.  If it's too big, it's a waste of space, and if it's too small, you 
can't keep the multiple kernels you want there.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 12:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] R/O Linux guest?
>
>
> Having /boot separate allows you to decide which volume you
> want to IPL
> from.  It also allows you to have multiple IPL volumes
> available.  I also
> have a /boot1, /boot2.4, etc.  /root is root's home directory
> and it forces
> me to be careful with how much junk I put there.  If it were
> part of /, then
> I could conceivably fill it up by being careless.
>
> In my particular case, /usr, /opt, are shared read-only with
> other systems.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by a kernel upgrade forcing me to replace
> multiple minidisks.  Most of the stuff that would need to be
> upgraded along
> with the kernel typically lives in /usr.
>
> Mark Post
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chet Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 7:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: R/O Linux guest?
>
>
> Per the below (03/12/02) response, what devices are Read-Only and
> shared? It seems to me that only /usr and /usr/src could be. Then why
> separate /root and /boot? I know you had a good reason, and I'm in the
> process of re-mapping my file structures. Also, doesn't a kernel
> upgrade force you to roll out multiple minidisk replacements?
> Too bad we can't map it the same as USS with a separate /etc
> per image.
>
> From Archives Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 18:38:59 -0800
> Mark Post wrote:
> >/boot, /var and /tmp do _not_ have to be on the root file system.
> >Mine aren't.  Unless you play some games, /bin, /dev, /etc, /lib,
> >and /sbin have to be part of the root file system.  Anything else
> >can be easily put on a different one.
> >~ > df
> >Filesystem           1k-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
> >/dev/dasdb1              52284     35868     13720  72% /
> >/dev/dasdc1            1062992    388560    620436  39% /tmp
> >/dev/dasdd1            1417324   1337424      7904  99% /usr
> >/dev/dasde1             111572     50520     55296  48% /var
> >/dev/dasdf1             104596     73036     26164  74% /opt
> >/dev/dasdg1              10432      1756      8140  18% /boot
> >/dev/dasdh1              52284      4936     44652  10% /root
> >/dev/dasdi1              24384     12912     10216  56% /home
> >/dev/dasdj1             921228    773876    100556  89% /usr/src
>
> Mark Post
>
>
>
> =====
> Chet Norris
> Marriott International,Inc.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
>

Reply via email to