A long time ago I read that they did TCO studies, and found it less costly to 
buy lots of low cost hardware over buying fewer high cost systems.

-----Original Message-----
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yu
Safin
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 12:39 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Google out of capacity?


On 5/4/06, James Melin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does that remind anyone of the descriptions of the humongous vaccuum tube 
> driven machines that had techs walking through the innards and replacing
> burnt out tubes? Seems Google has come full circle.
>
>
>
>
>             Joe Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>             Sent by: Linux on 390 Port
>             <LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU>                                         
>                                                                     To
>                                                                     
> LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
>                                                                               
>                                                                     cc
>             05/04/2006 12:52 PM
>                                                                               
>                                                                Subject
>                                                                     Re: 
> Google out of capacity?
>                            Please respond to
>               Linux on 390 Port <LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday 04 May 2006 01:03 pm, Joseph Temple wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know how many of what class of servers are being used?   Also,
> > my guess is that some sort of hybrid might be the answer.  That is some of
> > the clusters may lend themselves to virtualization more than others,
> > yielding variable leverage for different platforms.
> >
> I remember hearing that there are thousands (25k?) in the various computer
> rooms, each one being a special design commodity item.  Technicians walk
> through the rooms with carts, removing failed servers and replacing them with
> new ones.  The old ones are just trashed - not worthy of an attempt to
> repair.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
> http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
>
does naybody know if Google's qualified Planners are looking at the
TCO (total cost of ownership) to justify 100k servers versus
SUN/AIX/zOS/zVM solutions?
or is it philosophical and their investors/board of directors want to
show innovation as a way to increase capitalization?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390

Reply via email to