Sounds cooler too. Like you have a cool French accent: "We install z Linux on z processor and we consolidate z servers" :) Unless you're from Canada, then your all zed this and that.
(sorry, recently watched Ratatouille :) Marcy Cortes "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation." -----Original Message----- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 5:36 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] z/Linux or zLinux - which is preferred? If I may, I think the consensus is that zLinux or z/Linux are both fine when you want to say Linux running on the mainframe. Although they are not officially sanctioned by IBM marketing, everyone knows what you mean. I agree with Marcy, z/Linux looks cooler. (-: And seems to make the most sense. z/OS is the z MVS operating system that runs on z, and z/Linux would be the Linux version that runs on z. In other words, if heck frosted over, then we would have z/Windows. Oh that's so funny. Does that sound right? Lindy ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
