>>> On 6/18/2015 at 10:56 AM, Alan Altmark <alan_altm...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Ummm..... I wouldn't do that. I simply want the documentation to > disappear and any distro-provided configuration panels to remove it. If > someone already has it, accept it, warn that it is being ignored, and
Whereas I would prefer to have the entire concept vanish. If something can only cause problems/confusion, there's no up side to keeping it. > ignore it. I don't want failures because someone specifies the portname. > And it is still an attribute of the OSA, even if Linux isn't using it. There wouldn't be any failures if someone provides a portname in a parmfile, for instance. The installer would ignore it as would the kernel. As for being "an attribute of the OSA" I'm sure there are _plenty_ of other attributes that exist that people outside of IBM don't even know about. If we can safely ignore those, then we can safely ignore this one. Mark Post ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For more information on Linux on System z, visit http://wiki.linuxvm.org/
