Hello, On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote: > I have a perfectly matched step of 366 Celerons, it does not crash..... > It is so trusted that it is at a remote location on a UPS. It runs so > well, I boasted about it at Atlanta Linux Showcase. > > The problem is that mine runs perfectly...... Well, then, I'm sure you're tired of hearing us all complain about our boards not working while yours runs perfectly. So, to make you feel better, I'll gladly trade you my board for yours so you have something that crashes regularly to test with. You can write me off the list and I'll give you my address, where you can send your board to. No need to thank me, and nice guy in my shoes would do the same thing. Looking forward to a board that works, -Eric :-P -- =- To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the -= =- body of "unsubscribe linux-abit". -=
- [LINUX-ABIT] It was Abit's experiment after all! DeWitt, Michael
- RE: [LINUX-ABIT] It was Abit's experiment after al... Patrick Cole
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] It was Abit's experiment after al... Andre Hedrick
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] It was Abit's experiment afte... Patrick Cole
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] It was Abit's experiment ... Valentijn Sessink
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] It was Abit's experiment ... Andre Hedrick
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] It was Abit's experim... Eric Andreychek
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] It was Abit's ex... Andre Hedrick
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] It was Abit'... Paolo Nenzi
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] It was A... Patrick Cole
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] It was Abit'... ramses
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] It was A... Rod Roark
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] It was A... defec
- RE: [LINUX-ABIT] It was A... William B. Clay
- [LINUX-ABIT] significant ... D. Hugh Redelmeier
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] signific... Daniel Smolik
- Re: [LINUX-ABIT] It was Abit's experim... Valentijn Sessink
