Linux-Advocacy Digest #920, Volume #27 Mon, 24 Jul 00 19:13:04 EDT
Contents:
Re: Linux is blamed for users trolling-wish. (The Ghost In The Machine)
Re: Just curious, how do I do this in Windows? ("Drestin Black")
Re: Just curious, how do I do this in Windows? ("Drestin Black")
Re: Just curious, how do I do this in Windows? ("Drestin Black")
Re: Just curious, how do I do this in Windows? (abraxas)
Re: Just curious, how do I do this in Windows? (abraxas)
Re: What I've always said: Netcraft numbers of full of it (abraxas)
Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action (was: Microsoft
Ruling Too Harsh (Loren Petrich)
Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action (was: Microsoft
Ruling Too Harsh (Loren Petrich)
Re: Microsoft Ruling Too Harsh
Re: Leninist USEFUL IDIOT denies reality, attempts a smear campaign (Loren Petrich)
Re: If Microsoft starts renting apts (was: If Microsoft starts renting ("Aaron R.
Kulkis")
Re: From a Grove of Birch Trees It Came... (Loren Petrich)
Re: The Dream World of Linux Zealots ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: The Dream World of Linux Zealots ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action (was: ("Aaron R.
Kulkis")
Re: Just curious, how do I do this in Windows? (abraxas)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Ghost In The Machine)
Crossposted-To: alt.sad-people.microsoft.lovers,alt.destroy.microsoft
Subject: Re: Linux is blamed for users trolling-wish.
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 21:54:04 GMT
In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Aaron R. Kulkis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote
on Sat, 22 Jul 2000 21:19:45 -0400
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
>>
>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Aaron R. Kulkis
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote
>> on Sat, 22 Jul 2000 00:28:06 -0400
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> >
>> >
>> >"T. Max Devlin" wrote:
>> >>
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> >> You are *not* good for my attitude, Aaron.
>> >
>> >Can I interest you in a sniper-grade AR-15....accurate to 1,000 yards...
>>
>> Ye gods. As if the anti-choicers weren't bad enough
>> in talk.abortion... :-)
>>
>> Letting Billy boy rot in a jail cell is one thing, but shooting
>> him's probably over the line.
>>
>> Of course, we could lock him in a white-walled room with a
>> table and a computer with "BOB" running on it, and he
>> can't .... exit .... it!
>
>That would by cruel and unusual punishment.
And subjecting us to "BOB" in the first place isn't?? :-) :-)
[snip]
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- insert random misquote here
------------------------------
From: "Drestin Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Just curious, how do I do this in Windows?
Date: 24 Jul 2000 16:55:56 -0500
"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>
> "T. Max Devlin" wrote:
> >
> > Said Aaron R. Kulkis in comp.os.linux.advocacy;
> > [...]
> > >You can't even be bothered to test a simple 10-line program, and
> > >yet, you expect us to believe your other exhortations?
> > >
> > >Come now, we're not nearly as stupid as you, punk.
> >
> > Well, that's true, but he was providing a quick-and-dirty example of a
> > concept, and his code illustrated the solution. He might be stupid (and
> > I'm anxious to learn more either way), but he is merely a "punk", at
> > best, for not actually testing the scratch-code he was using for a
> > simple example. I'd like to hear a more telling argument confronting
> > his other exhortations, if you've got one.
>
> More to the point, he thinks that string-variables are an appropriate
> solution for binary data.
No, I just did it cause it was quick and dirty but you constantly ignore
that. Fine.
>
> Strings are assumed to terminate at any byte that is all 00's.
Wrong. You are wrong. Ahhh mr programmer man, you are so limited in your
knowledge and skills and it shows. Basic is not hampered by zero
termination. I can include ascii 0 values in my strings all I want,
anywhere, without any ill effect. You'd know that if you were a real
programmer...
>
> thus, trying to a 'big-endian' <--> 'little-endian' switch
> will utterly fail on a number such as
>
> 0x 23 45 00 0a 00 3d 83 7b
And did you test this with my function? No, becuuase if you did, guess
what - it would work perfectly!
>
> The reason I call him a "punk" is because he actually believes it
> is appropriate to perform numeric operations with string functions...
> a flawed technique, for the reasons outlined above.
>
the reason I now tell you to fuck off is because you have proven beyond any
shadow of a doubt that you are even stupider than abracadabra and that's
pretty hard to be...
------------------------------
From: "Drestin Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Just curious, how do I do this in Windows?
Date: 24 Jul 2000 17:02:09 -0500
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:8le8v7$60q$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> "Drestin Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> >> Yikes! If I give you 0x00012345, you'd give me back 0x00452301, which
is
> >> completely wrong. There is a huge difference between something begin
zero
> >> and something being empty, or not existant.
>
> >Yes, you are right. That was a mistake and easily fixed.
>
> Well, it kinda shows that your whole idea of figuring out the size of
> the integer you are passed is doomed. I mean, you go "Convert it to
> hex, and then count digits" --- however, doing that, you cannot decide
> whether you were passed a 16 bit integer, or a 32 bit integer with the top
> 16 bits happening to be zero.
I made a stupid assumption that worked within the limited knowledge I have
of endian math. Again, I do not perform these functions. Ever. So I have no
knowledge of the problem other than a single reference I found on the web in
a perl newsgroup plus mention of a function called "Swap" in delphi 5.
>
> >> Of course, the whole idea of doing this sort of thing with strings is
> >> repulsive. Tell me, how long would the VB equivalent of
>
> >Hey, it was a quick and dirty function. I wasn't shooting for the
cleanest
> >solution of the year award. It does it's job doesn't it?
>
> No, it didn't. And there is a difference between "violates some of the
> more subtler rules of good code" and "code that in its very design is
> repulsive".
sigh - do you actualy have so little life that you would spend any extended
amount of time writing detailed structured documented and properly indented
code to post into newsgroups where you KNOW no matter how good it is that
it'll be shreded just on principle? Some said, this can't be done in basic
and I did it. Period.
>
> >> >and then laughed cause he said I took the hard route and that there
> >> >is a much easier way in VB. Argh, now I'm going to have to actually
> >> >think for a bit...)
> >>
> >> It would be advisable to do that, anyway.
>
> >yes, but think about something. The function that was choosen is
singularly
> >something a VB programmer is never really facing. Far as I know, I'll
never
> >be porting my VB app between different endian machines.
>
> I am sorry, Drestin, but coming up with all sorts of excuses for why
> you wrote what you wrote doesn't change the fact that you wrote it.
> If you were one of my first year students and handed in that code as
> a prac solution, you'd get 1 or 2 marks out of 10.
and you know what - if it was for a test I'm sure I'd have understood what
endian math was up front and would have spent more than a few seconds
thinking about it and done it with bitwise operations - but you only have
the lust in your eyes to put down and insult and can't for a moment look
past the superficial and see it for what it is.
>
> I can assure you that some of my first years would bang out an 8 out
> of 10 marks solution in a matter of 2 minutes. I would then chide them
> about some minor style issues, and about commenting their code, and they
> would take another 5 minutes to get it to 10 out of 10.
Allow me to borrow from your signature to remark on that above paragraph:
"But what... is it good for?"
Who the FUCK cares about a BASIC function, especially a visual basic
function, to perform endian flips? In my math toolbox of functions from
crescent I've found an assembly langauge endian flip function. I would NEVER
write such a function in BASIC, I'd just call this one and it'd be done
faster and more effeciently than ANY C routine. THAT'S why all this means
nothing and the blind rush of people desperate to tear down my arguments
result in picking on style versus content. Give me a break...
>
> Bernie
>
> --
> But what ... is it good for?
> Engineer at the Advanced Computing Systems Division of IBM
> 1968, commenting on the microchip
------------------------------
From: "Drestin Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Just curious, how do I do this in Windows?
Date: 24 Jul 2000 17:03:15 -0500
"T. Max Devlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> So anyway, is the semicolon a "go", rather than a delimiter? And what
> would you suggest would be the easiest way to use a background in BASIC
> to attack Linux?
my god - you are truly and most completely pathetic - do you even know that?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (abraxas)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Just curious, how do I do this in Windows?
Date: 24 Jul 2000 22:03:13 GMT
In comp.os.linux.advocacy Drestin Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Gary Hallock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> Drestin Black wrote:
>>
>> > Actually - I never ever have need for this function in BASIC which is
> why i
>> > was unfamiliar with it so I just jotted out a brute force solution - the
>> > first thing to pop to mind. I didn't sit and dwell on it or spend more
> than
>> > a few seconds to pound out the code. Someone just said "couldn't be done
> in
>> > VB" - and I did. That's all.
>> >
>> > Your version from the C version is more efficient.
>>
>> So I guess you have never written a program that has to send data over a
>> network.
>
> Sigh... how on EARTH do you make that silly conclusion from what we're
> talking about. Gary, listen and I'll use small words: I just cranked out a
> quick solution for a silly problem someone threw out. That's it. Period.
> Done.
>
And judging by the quality of your "program", you are a "shitty programmer".
Hell, I could have done better than that on the first try, and im a downright
terrible programmer.
> THIS is the reason whenver someone says: "prove you can program, write a
> program" I never take the bait and shouldn't have here. NO MATTER WHAT I
> WOULD HAVE WRITTEN it would have resulted in the same type of crap.
>
True, because no matter what you had written, it would have been shit code
by a shitty programmer.
=====yttrx
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (abraxas)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Just curious, how do I do this in Windows?
Date: 24 Jul 2000 22:04:29 GMT
In comp.os.linux.advocacy Drestin Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, I have written network applications. In fact, the very last large
> application I wrote involved a medical transcription package which was fully
> network multiuser. So, you have guessed wrong.
>
And what would the name of this application be, dresden? Where can
the class learn more about it?
Heres your chance dresden, you can redeem yourself and be taken semi-seriously
as at least an ACTIVE programmer (if not a very good one)---or you can be
taken as a lying asshole who patently refuses to back up any of his claims.
=====yttrx
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (abraxas)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: What I've always said: Netcraft numbers of full of it
Date: 24 Jul 2000 22:08:33 GMT
In comp.os.linux.advocacy Drestin Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'll leave finding them as an assignment to the class.
>
> no, you can't and you know you can't. Go ahead, show us one. Find me an
> 'explorer replacment' that will boot NT to a text command prompt - a fully
> function NT OS running, just in text mode. You should me that and I'll for a
> brief moment consider you are not just some hopelessly punctured sack of
> protoplasm
>
Why dont you give us the name of that nifty program you wrote that knows
what a 'network' is?
>>
>> >
>> > abracadabra - you've been repeatedly exposed as nothing but a pain - go
> away
>> > troll child.
>>
>> Tell me about how youre a programmer again?
>
> easy: I can program. Unlike you who's shown us nothing but crap.
>
>
Actually, you have shown beyond the shadow of a doubt that you indeed
CANNOT program.
Therefore, you cannot truthfully call yourself a 'programmer'.
And again dresden...heres your chance. Submit some code to the class and
prove me wrong! What have you written? Whats it called? Where is it?
And what of these copyright claims?
=====yttrx
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Loren Petrich)
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian
Subject: Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action (was:
Microsoft Ruling Too Harsh
Date: 24 Jul 2000 22:11:32 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Loren Petrich wrote:
>> That's horse manure, and *you* know it, Mr. Kulkis. If business
>> turns bad, employees get laid off.
>But not until the owners have actually bee LOSING MONEY while the
>employees are STILL GETTING PAID.
The owners? That might be a problem for privately held companies,
but publicly held ones have this wonderful government giveaway known as
"limited liability". The only way a stockholder will lose is if the
stock's price goes too low, and that's all a stockholder will lose.
--
Loren Petrich Happiness is a fast Macintosh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] And a fast train
My home page: http://www.petrich.com/home.html
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Loren Petrich)
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian
Subject: Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action (was:
Microsoft Ruling Too Harsh
Date: 24 Jul 2000 22:12:34 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Donovan Rebbechi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>As for the employees, there's nothing stopping them from
>becoming shareholders if the company is public. In fact it's in the
>interests of the employees as a group to own some company stock.
And it's in everybody's interest to create Utopia.
--
Loren Petrich Happiness is a fast Macintosh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] And a fast train
My home page: http://www.petrich.com/home.html
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Crossposted-To:
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian,alt.politics.economics
Subject: Re: Microsoft Ruling Too Harsh
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 22:12:42 GMT
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 20:51:12 GMT, MK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 20:42:30 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] () wrote:
>
>>>> Hardly. This action was brought about under a 100 year old
>>>> statute. Microsoft just blew it off and suffered the fate
>>>> of ANYONE that blows off a judge.
>>>
>>>Hmmm... the Clayton Act of 1914 is the basis for the Microsoft vs DOJ case,
>>>the Sherman Act of 1890 was focused on restraint of Interstate and Foreign
>>>trade. Subtle difference.
>
>> Are you trying to seriously claim that the bulk of Microsoft
>> business doesn't fall into that category?
>
>Do you claim that the "abuse of monopoly power" charge makes sense in this
>context?
Why not? They do indulge in interstate or foreign commerce with
or within the United States. That puts them directly under the
jurisdiction of one of the US governments few legitimate powers.
--
Finding an alternative should not be like seeking out the holy grail.
That is the whole damn point of capitalism.
|||
/ | \
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Loren Petrich)
Crossposted-To:
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian
Subject: Re: Leninist USEFUL IDIOT denies reality, attempts a smear campaign
Date: 24 Jul 2000 22:17:41 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Loren Petrich wrote:
>> And in the case of Poland, Solidarity operated out in the open for
>> months before the Soviet Union's leaders got the Polish armed forces to do
>> their dirty work for them.
>Thus, you make my point for me. If the Russians wanted to keep
>him quiet, then they would have had him snagged the first night
>he started making a nuisance of himself...BEFORE the western media
>ever found out.
From a grove of birch trees it came. The Soviet Union's leaders
were (1) not very happy with Solidarity and (2) unwilling to repeat their
interventions in Hungary and Czechoslovakia. And they did not intervene
*directly*, as they had done earlier.
--
Loren Petrich Happiness is a fast Macintosh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] And a fast train
My home page: http://www.petrich.com/home.html
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,alt.fan.bill-gates,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: If Microsoft starts renting apts (was: If Microsoft starts renting
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 18:15:09 -0400
The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
>
> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Aaron R. Kulkis
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote
> on Sat, 22 Jul 2000 20:10:00 -0400
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> >"T. Max Devlin" wrote:
> >>
> >> Said Aaron R. Kulkis in alt.fan.bill-gates;
> >> >> All of this discussion about Microsoft renting apps with .NET
> >> >> got me to thinking...what are we facing if, in fact, Microsoft
> >> >> does start renting apts???
> >> >>
> >> >> Microsoft Apts 2000
> >> >>
> >> >> WINDOW
> >> >>
> >> >> No apartment may ever have more than one window. Residents might
> >> >> forget which window they were looking out of and get confused.
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> Hilarious! Where'd it come from?
> >
> >I wrote it.
>
> In that case, you might consider giving us the Webpage containing
> it. :-) (Presumably, you've got a home page/site to put it on.)
just came up with it.
Never bothered to make a webpage (although, when I was in college,
I used to have a .plan that served the same purpose.)
>
> [.sigsnip]
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- that way, I can bookmark it with my 7,000
> Other WebPages I Need To Sort Through SomeDay :-)
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Loren Petrich)
Crossposted-To:
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian
Subject: Re: From a Grove of Birch Trees It Came...
Date: 24 Jul 2000 22:24:05 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Loren Petrich wrote:
>> The way that you believe yourself to be a victim of the
>> International Communist Conspiracy?
>The communists believe in it...and they ought to know.
Communists have been willing to hate each other, fight each
other, and persecute each other, which makes them something other than
unified, indistinguishable villains.
--
Loren Petrich Happiness is a fast Macintosh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] And a fast train
My home page: http://www.petrich.com/home.html
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: The Dream World of Linux Zealots
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 18:16:54 -0400
Slava Pestov wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Data processing is oftentimes best represented in the mind as
> >> > 3+ dimensional processes. On the average, men's brains are MUCH
> >> > more adept at this sort of thinking (in the same way as on the
> >> > average, women's brain's are much more adept at acquiring and using
> >> > linquistic skills)
>
> Your original point was about setting up a Linux box, which has nothing
> to do with "data processing" and certainly doesn't involve "3+ dimensional
> processes".
>
> > You're problem is that you cling tightly to your "equalist" philospophy
> > even when nature contradicts it.
>
> Do you equate "nature" with "fundamentalist christian 'family values'"?
>
> > With women going into every field these days, please explain why men
> > outnumber women by VAST ratios (like, 10:1) in computer science, etc.
> > even though women are the MAJORITY on most college campuses.
>
> The reason for the men -vs- women disparity is that people who share your
> ignorant views are still around.
I base my opinions on the latest RESEARCH in the field.
>
> Slava
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: The Dream World of Linux Zealots
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 18:17:57 -0400
Slava Pestov wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Personally, I find the differences between the thinking of men and
> >> woman similar to the differences between KDE and GNOME; not very
> >> interesting and far too slight to really matter.
> >
> > Evidently, you are not well-read on the subject.
> >
> > Catch up, and get back to me.
>
> And what exactly should he read? The bible? The burden of proof is yours
> Aaron, and you still haven't provided any. Until you do, you are an
> ignorant sexist and that's it.
>
> >> > the exception does not make the rule.
> >>
> >> But, the exception does invalidate the rule.
> >
> > No...an exception is an exception.
> >
>
> Maybe you're the exception here, Aaron.
Are you saying that most people place political ideology ahead of
scientific research? In that case, maybe I am the exception.
>
> Slava
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian
Subject: Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action (was:
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 18:19:50 -0400
MK wrote:
>
> On 21 Jul 2000 00:29:00 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Loren Petrich) wrote:
>
> >>>>You wanna see poverty, and HUGE disparities between the rich and the
> >>>>poor? Then go to a communist country and look around.
> >
> >>> Thus making it an inegalitarian's dream world.
> >>No, it's nearly egalitarian's dreamworld -- almost all starve equally.
> >
> > ROTFL. That's not egaltarianism but just the opposite.
>
> Scuze me?! That's sharing _equally_ whatever is there, or whatever
> is lacking. That's egalitarianism -- sharing benefits and miseries
> (almost) equally.
>
> Petrich, your brain is fried! You don't get the simplest ideas right!
>
Typical of those living in the greatest example of how capitalism
DOES work (for anyone who has motivation, and even a lot who don't),
who STILL wants a communist system.
> MK
>
> ---
>
> There is no leftist thinking other than inherently muddleheaded thinking.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (abraxas)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Just curious, how do I do this in Windows?
Date: 24 Jul 2000 22:27:54 GMT
In comp.os.linux.advocacy Drestin Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basic is not hampered
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
=====yttrx
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.advocacy) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
