Linux-Advocacy Digest #290, Volume #28 Mon, 7 Aug 00 20:13:04 EDT
Contents:
Re: one of Lenin's Useful Idiots denies reality ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: AARON KULKIS...USENET SPAMMER, LIAR, AND THUG ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Will Linux Dominate the Desktop Future? (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Paging BIG DON ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
WA - UNIX System Admin - Wanted ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Just curious, how do I do this in Windows? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Just curious, how do I do this in Windows? ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Big Brother and the Holding Company ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian,alt.society.liberalism,soc.singles
Subject: Re: one of Lenin's Useful Idiots denies reality
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 18:59:48 -0400
SemiScholar wrote:
>
> On Mon, 07 Aug 2000 16:52:06 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >SemiScholar wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 04 Aug 2000 19:43:57 -0400, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >SemiScholar wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, 03 Aug 2000 15:54:08 GMT, "Marcus Turner"
> >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> >> >Of course, the guy who wrote PC-Dos at the other company was working for
> >> >> >MS
> >> >> >> >at the time they wrote MS-Dos, so it's easy to get confused...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I don't think that's correct. They guy (Tim Patterson, I believe)
> >> >> >> sold the rights to his CP/M clone (which he simply called DOS, a
> >> >> >> commonly used name in those days for a number of O/S's) to Microsoft,
> >> >> >> but I don't think he ever went to work for them. In any case,
> >> >> >> "PC-DOS" and "MS-DOS" were identical except for the marketing name.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Not according to Tim or Seattle Software. Q-Dos was the Seattle Software(?)
> >> >> >product they bought for $50,000 in '80. Seattle Software later sued MS and
> >> >> >got another $500,000, I think.
> >> >>
> >> >> $100,000 as I recall, but no matter. You're right, though - it was
> >> >> "QDOS" - for "Quick & Dirty DOS".
> >> >
> >> >Quick and Dirty OS, dork.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> <chuckle> Imagine that - a unix guy (in 2000) calling somebody _else_
> >> a "dork" - especially - and this is the _really_ funny part - over the
> >> name of an operating system. <guffaw>
> >
> >Laugh all you want....giggling idiot.
> >
> >Your account is flawed, as HISTORY shows that the name was
> >QDOS for Quick and Dirty OS
> >
> >not QD-DOS
>
> Hey! You dropped your pocket protector...
Translation: CompleteDolt admits defeat to me.
GAME
SET
MATCH
YOU LOSE!
>
> - SemiScholar
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: AARON KULKIS...USENET SPAMMER, LIAR, AND THUG
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 19:02:27 -0400
Andres Soolo wrote:
>
> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Still, the Middle Ages feudal villages didn't have much capitalism.
> >> In Russia, the grassroots have already moved to it.
> >> Mafia wouldn't be possible without capitalism.
> > That's a naive statement.
> > The "Russian Mafia" is composed primarily of KGB agents.
> > This has been well-documented for some time.
> Yes, AFAIK, the Great Russian Mafia is largely based on former KGB
> and military structures. Still, Russia does also have plenty of
> grassroot organized criminal structures (not counting the littlest
> band of two-three men that clearly can't be considered organized).
> Much of them aren't very powerful and they can't obviously `work'
> in areas the GRM likes, but they're responsible for most of the
> low-level crimes. (IIRC, most of the American independent gangs
> were pressured out of business or joined Cosa Nostra before the
> WWII, so I'm fairly confident something similar will happen in
> Russia too, over time.)
>
> As of the GRM, it actually isn't an ordinary Mafia structure.
> It's so large it really isn't interested in low-scale things;
> it targets mostly enterprises and sometimes the international
> politics. Things like prostitution and to some extent, the
> drug dealing (especially the distribution) are delegated to
> small groups that usually are loosely related to the main body.
> Of course, the main body protects them from competing gangs
> etc, but it doesn't actually have much more to do with it.
The Russian Mafia is an example of one of the "unusual, even
criminal means" of advancing Communism which Lenin talked about.
> --
> Andres Soolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> There is no likelihood man can ever tap the power of the atom.
> -- Robert Millikan, Nobel Prize in Physics, 1923
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: T. Max Devlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft
Subject: Re: Will Linux Dominate the Desktop Future?
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 19:05:37 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Said John Sanders in alt.destroy.microsoft;
>"T. Max Devlin" wrote:
>>
>> Said John Sanders in alt.destroy.microsoft;
>> >"T. Max Devlin" wrote:
>
>> > But, "being contrary just for the hell of it", we all know what that
>> >means.
>>
>> That you consider it more a "fallacy of exclusion"?
>>
>> http://www.intrepidsoftware.com/fallacy/exclus.htm
>
> Do you just go to the index page of the URL above a click at random?
Did you study the page an my references to it in an attempt to consider
that possibility yourself before asking me, or is this merely an
incipient ad hominem attack (abusive)?
http://www.intrepidsoftware.com/fallacy/attack.htm
--
T. Max Devlin
-- Such is my recollection of my reconstruction
of events at the time, as I recall. Consider it.
Research assistance gladly accepted. --
====== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ======
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
======= Over 80,000 Newsgroups = 16 Different Servers! ======
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,soc.culture.african.american,sci.anthropology
Subject: Re: Paging BIG DON
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 19:10:03 -0400
Loren Petrich wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
>
> >> Yes, but what makes you sound like a kook is your unsupportable assumption
> >> that this kind of behaviour is commonplace. You make it sound as though
> >> most women scheme to deceive men into having their children.
> >Do you have another name for a woman who promises to love, honor,
> >and cherish a man until death comes between them...and then
> >promptly divorces him once she has her desired number of kids?
> >By the way...this is the scenario for 70% of divorces.
>
> Evidence other than Mr. Kulkis's posture of victimhood: {}
I'm not divorced. I would never be so fooooolish as to marry
any woman born and raised in this nation.
> >I'm talking about the millions of RETARDS whom we are sending
> >BILLIONS of dollars of Welfare and Foodstamps every year!
> >How about living an entire life in rat-and-cockroach-infested
> >dwellings that can only be considered firetraps.
> >Ever find a live cockroach in your breakfast cereal?
> >That's reality for these people.
> >Their entire lives are nothing but misery.
>
> But how are they getting such big loads of money if that is the case?
In case you haven't noticed, it doesn't help them.
>
> >As I said...the consequence should be to becoming a ward of the
> >state, where you will be paid honest wages doing some socially
> >useful work until you get the motivation to get out.
> >Not the current: We'll give you an allowance like a child, but
> >allow you to roam free as a responsible adult. No sirree.
>
> >They want to act like a child, then we should treat them like
> >children. Here is your room. Here is your daily schedule.
> >This percentage of your pay will be withheld to pay off your
> >debts. Your room will be searched for drugs and other
> >contraband every night. If you want to leave the grounds,
> >then you can only do so under the accompaniment of a guard
> >(whom you will have to pay for...)
>
> I sense a sort of vindictiveness about this, something that makes
> think that Mr. Kulkis is a big fan of Soviet gulags.
Wrong. There is a fundamental difference.
The gulags are for POLITICAL prisoners. My idea is for economic
deadbeats....who are freed upon paying their back taxes...which
they will earn while under state custody.
>
> >Those who wish to leave...need merely start behaving like
> >responsible adults, pay off their tax debt as soon as
> >possible, and continue their newfound motivation to stay
> >a self-supporting member of society.
> >And those who _refuse_ to work can starve...at that point,
> >their children will be let free, to go forth, and carry
> >on with their parent's miserable end an unmistakeable
> >lesson forever in their
>
> Given Mr. Kulkis, the "tax debt" will be so big that it can never
> be paid off over a lifetime at anything less than a Kennedy/Rockefeller
> income.
>
> >WELFARE is nothing more than ENSLAVEMENT of those who do work,
> >and it's about time that this new slave system be terminated.
>
> Cry me a river.
How about we cut off the checks, and let them work--or starve.
their choice.
>
> >> >Want some good examples? Watch Howard Stern's show. Harold
> >> I have no desire to watch it.
> >Neither do I. I don't even watch TV unless I happen to be
> >at someone's house who is watching it.
>
> Howard Stern is simply practicing capitalism here, which is
> supposedly a Good Thing.
I don't care for Howard Stern, nor his Private Farts..but he has
every right to do his show.
>
> >> That's funny -- a lot of these so-called "socialist" countries have
> >> a better educated population than America.
> >That's because the Communists are engaged in a specific campaign
> >to NEUTER the United States through internal collapse. ...
>
> From a grove of birch trees it came...
And of course, the knee-jerk response whenever I hit upon
yet another uncomfortable truth.
> --
> Loren Petrich Happiness is a fast Macintosh
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] And a fast train
> My home page: http://www.petrich.com/home.html
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WA - UNIX System Admin - Wanted
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 23:06:21 GMT
eCash Technologies, Inc. (www.ecash.net) located in Bothell, WA
provides software solutions that extend and enhance physical-world
payment methods. Simply put, we are producing the next generation of
electronic payment technology. We can because we have the only proven
solution for secure, private, and fraud-free electronic cash
transactions on the Internet. Our system is available for
implementation by any financial institution or wireless service
provider and usable by any consumer or merchant. Our system works not
only from a desktop, but also through a mobile device or PDA. eCash
Technologies is currently seeking a:
Senior System Administrator (CS-032)
Responsibilities:
Maintain a highly available, colocated production Solaris and Windows
NT environment
Work closely with other members of operations group to ensure 24x7
operations of an Internet-based transaction-processing system
Work with the engineering group to tune performance and develop a
monitoring system
Requirements:
Minimum of five years of experience in system administration
Strong UNIX skills and some knowledge of Windows NT
Strong networking experience, including experience with firewalls,
routing, and security
Experience dealing with Internet Service Providers (ISPs)
Ability to set up networks for UNIX computers
Experience supporting and maintaining highly reliable (24x7) and highly
secure sites
Understanding of application servers and HTTP servers such as Apache or
Netscape/iPlanet
Motivation and can-do attitude
Additional preferred qualifications:
Experience with load balancing and system redundancy
Please send your résumé and cover letter via e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], or fax them to (425) 415-1060. Please include
the name and number (if available) of the job you're applying for in
the e-mail message or fax.
eCash Technologies is an equal-opportunity employer.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Just curious, how do I do this in Windows?
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 19:18:29 -0400
Courageous wrote:
>
> > > **Do not change the return type of either f() or g()**
> > > Here it is:
> > >
> > > void f ( char* str, int nchars )
> >
> > MUST BE char* f (int nchars)
> > OR char* f ( char* str, int nchars )
>
> While this is a legal way of doing it, my instructions
> specifically forbid it and there is another answer. This
> other answer is essential in exploring the depth of your
> knowledge of pointers.
whoops.
void f ( char** str, int nchars).
and make appropriate adaptations.
>
> C//
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Just curious, how do I do this in Windows?
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 19:20:27 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> In all fairness, so did you. You did declare a variable "S", and
> >> then used it as the number of iterations through your loop --- but
> >> you never actually gave it a value ;-)
>
> >OF COURSE NOT...that's the job of the person CALLING THE FUNCTION!!!!
>
> Did you just use the word "function" in the same context as "Apple ][
> BASIC"? Uh-oh!
Pardon me. Subroutine
GOSUB [line number]
RETURN
>
> Bernie
> --
> If a cluttered desk signs a cluttered mind,
> Of what, then, is an empty desk a sign
> Albert Einstein.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Big Brother and the Holding Company
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 23:32:33 GMT
Yep...Linux is a dismal failure as far as the average desktop, non
nerd person is concerned.
If Gates were giving away Windows at the local computer shop or on the
net you wouldn't even be able to get near the place.
Claire
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000 11:41:26 -0400, "JS/PL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>No one WANTS an alternative to Windows therefore there is no market for one.
>There are plenty of alternatives and has been for QUITE a while. As is
>proven by the fact that Linux can't even be GIVEN away.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian
Subject: Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 19:31:06 -0400
Loren Petrich wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Jim Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >So you support the party you think will win, no matter if they aggree with
> >your politics?
>
> No, I support what I consider the lesser of two evils of major
> parties.
Translation: Given an option of picking from
Evil A
Evil B
Good C
Good D
Mediocre E
Loren opts for Evil.
Why does this not surprise me.
> And I will keep on doing that until the electoral laws are
After all, fat-boy can't afford to miss dinner
> reformed to make life easier for third parties. And there are several
> ways to do that.
>
> --
> Loren Petrich Happiness is a fast Macintosh
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] And a fast train
> My home page: http://www.petrich.com/home.html
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian
Subject: Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 19:31:42 -0400
neuralnoise wrote:
>
> "Loren Petrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:8mj69s$hv5
>
> > No, I support what I consider the lesser of two evils
>
> So you support evil? Why? Are you evil?
Yes, he is.
Also, he has no dick.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.legal,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.libertarian,talk.politics.libertarian
Subject: Re: Anti-Human Libertarians Oppose Microsoft Antitrust Action
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 19:33:55 -0400
Loren Petrich wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Jim Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 31 Jul 2000 03:54:45 GMT,
> > Loren Petrich, in the persona of <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > brought forth the following words...:
>
> >>>Perhaps you could explain to me what it means now? I am an American,
> >>>it is not a nationalist idea. It's about freedom.
> >> Being a member of a certain community. I'd like to see Mr.
> >>Richardson move to elsewhere in the world and still consider himself an
> >>honorary American.
> >You want to pay me to move? I'll consider it, if not, you don't want it
> >enough to matter.
>
> I'll try to make myself clearer. Would Mr. Richardson consider
> himself an American even if he was a lifelong resident and citizen of
> some other country.
>
> >>>> I'd prefer something more honest, such as support for a world
> >>>>government.
> >>>You won't get that from me, I am not in support of such a thing.
> >> So we are back to having national governments and national citizenship.
> >No, you are debating with the false-dilemma error. It's not either or.
>
> I personally think that anarchism is a utopian pipedream. It
Who here is advocating anarchy? You keep ACCUSING other people
of promoting it, but thus far, the only one who brings up the
concept of anarchy is YOU. Why is that, LOSER?
> seems to me that government will likely re-appear, though maybe under
> some other name. Read "Animal Farm" to see what I mean.
>
You mean that book about the hypocrisy of Communism....
heh ehhe hehh
> --
> Loren Petrich Happiness is a fast Macintosh
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] And a fast train
> My home page: http://www.petrich.com/home.html
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642
I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
J: Loren's Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.
C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
that she doesn't like.
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.
E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (D) above.
F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
response until their behavior improves.
G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
H: Knackos...you're a retard.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.advocacy) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
