Linux-Advocacy Digest #711, Volume #28           Mon, 28 Aug 00 17:13:06 EDT

Contents:
  Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...) (ZnU)
  Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...) ("Sam 
Morris")
  Re: How low can they go...? ("Robert Moir")
  Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...) (Inkswamp)
  Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...) (Inkswamp)
  Re: How low can they go...? ("John Hughes")
  Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...) (Donovan 
Rebbechi)
  Re: Enemies of Linux are MS Lovers (Shannon Hendrix)
  Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...) ("Aaron R. 
Kulkis")
  Re: Anonymous Wintrolls and Authentic Linvocates - Re: R.E. Ballard says Linux 
growth stagnating (Roberto Alsina)
  Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...) ("Aaron R. 
Kulkis")
  Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...) ("Aaron R. 
Kulkis")
  Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...) (Roberto 
Alsina)
  Re: Anonymous Wintrolls and Authentic Linvocates - Re: R.E. Ballard says Linux 
growth stagnating (Roberto Alsina)
  Re: NETCRAFT: I'm confused (Mig)
  Re: NETCRAFT: I'm confused ("Aaron R. Kulkis")

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: ZnU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...)
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 18:11:14 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Aaron R. Kulkis" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> ZnU wrote:

> > > But the USA is the only country where the leftists have committed
> > > to causing societal collapse from within.  If the US is weakened,
> > > the rest of the world is easily blackmailed.
> > 
> > What exactly are you talking about? The more "leftist" countries, on
> > average, have lower poverty rates and better educational systems than 
> > we
> > do. How do you account for this? Do they simply have fewer of these
> 
> The leftists in THIS country are in collaboration with the leftists
> in the other countries.  The overall goal is to weaken the US relative
> to the other countries, so that the US will become even weaker than
> them.

Why? What would they gain? What is your evidence for this absurd claim?

> Simply put...a large percentage of the education establishment
> should be put on trial for treason.
> 
> 
> Do you not have a brain capable of figuring this out yourself?

Damnit! Why do they never tell me about the vast left-wing conspiracies?

-- 
This universe shipped by weight, not volume.  Some expansion may have
occurred during shipment.

ZnU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <http://znu.dhs.org>

------------------------------

From: "Sam Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...)
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 19:11:08 +0100

> The leftists in THIS country are in collaboration with the leftists
> in the other countries.  The overall goal is to weaken the US relative
> to the other countries, so that the US will become even weaker than
> them.  Simply put...a large percentage of the education establishment
> should be put on trial for treason.

Oh no! He's discovered our despicable plans! Send someone to disappear him!

Aaron, please tell us you're not serious...

--
Cheers,

Sam




------------------------------

From: "Robert Moir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: How low can they go...?
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 19:36:22 +0100


"fungus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Jen wrote:
> >
> > On 22 Aug 2000 16:46:42 -0700, petilon
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >Many MS supporters opposed the idea of NCs
> >
> > Not to mention the buying public.  Just ask Larry.
>
>
> The MS supporters prefer to keep handing over their $$$
> to get their hands on "the only(sic) operating system
> designed just for you and your home PC."
>
> http://shop.microsoft.com/product/windows/msline.htm
>
> $289 for Windows ME...
>
> ...that's MORE EXPENSIVE than Windows 2000 Professional.
>
>
> I don't want to get overly cynical here[1] but it seems to
> me like this is a marketing excercise to find out just how
> ignorant/gullible the "buying public" really is.

I don't want to sound overly cynical either but I just clicked that link
above and it told me the price for a full copy of Windows ME is £209. Thats
if you want to buy a new copy, not an upgrade, and you cannot get it via an
OEM source (which will be the case for most people) - I still think thats
expensive myself, but you would appear to be in the wrong.

Seems like we might like spending our money but at least we can tell the
truth instead of making fools of ourselves by spreading fud thats so very
easily debunked.



------------------------------

From: Inkswamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...)
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 11:41:59 -0700

> The leftists in THIS country are in collaboration with the leftists
> in the other countries.  The overall goal is to weaken the US relative
> to the other countries, so that the US will become even weaker than
> them.  Simply put...a large percentage of the education establishment
> should be put on trial for treason.

To quote one of my favorite lyricists: "The ghosts of McCarthy...." 

This must be Ronald Reagan's true legacy: revived paranoia about the
threat from the left.

------------------------------

From: Inkswamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...)
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 11:43:07 -0700

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ZnU
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Damnit! Why do they never tell me about the vast left-wing conspiracies?

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!! LOL! Excellent! Never has right-wing hypocrisy been
more apparent than this! Way to go.

------------------------------

From: "John Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: How low can they go...?
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 20:26:41 +0100


"fungus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Jen wrote:
> >
> > On 22 Aug 2000 16:46:42 -0700, petilon
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >Many MS supporters opposed the idea of NCs
> >
> > Not to mention the buying public.  Just ask Larry.
>
>
> The MS supporters prefer to keep handing over their $$$
> to get their hands on "the only(sic) operating system
> designed just for you and your home PC."

MS supporters?

You mean Windows users? Right?

>
> http://shop.microsoft.com/product/windows/msline.htm
>
> $289 for Windows ME...
>

Its $209. Not that it makes much difference. ;)

Thats over double the price of Mac OS 9 at $99.

> ...that's MORE EXPENSIVE than Windows 2000 Professional.
>

$219 for an upgrade and $289 full.


>
> I don't want to get overly cynical here[1] but it seems to
> me like this is a marketing excercise to find out just how
> ignorant/gullible the "buying public" really is.
>
>

We shall see.

>
> [1] I'm sure that this *must* be more that Windows 98 with a
> copy of the latest Windows Media Player added.... right?

Right. But not enough to justify the price tag.



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donovan Rebbechi)
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...)
Date: 28 Aug 2000 19:38:10 GMT

On Mon, 28 Aug 2000 18:11:14 GMT, ZnU wrote:
 
>> Do you not have a brain capable of figuring this out yourself?
>
>Damnit! Why do they never tell me about the vast left-wing conspiracies?

It's just as well we have Mr Kulkis here to amuse^H^H^H^H^Hinform us 
otherwise we'd all be in the dark !

-- 
Donovan

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shannon Hendrix)
Crossposted-To: alt.microsoft.sucks,alt.destroy.microsoft
Subject: Re: Enemies of Linux are MS Lovers
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 15:07:20 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Person 7 wrote:

|Hope you don't mind me asking, but are you deliberately spelling like
|a five year old or are you just a complete spacker?

What is a spacker?


------------------------------

From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...)
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 16:00:23 -0400

Sam Morris wrote:
> 
> > The leftists in THIS country are in collaboration with the leftists
> > in the other countries.  The overall goal is to weaken the US relative
> > to the other countries, so that the US will become even weaker than
> > them.  Simply put...a large percentage of the education establishment
> > should be put on trial for treason.
> 
> Oh no! He's discovered our despicable plans! Send someone to disappear him!

It's not like it isn't already publicized within certain circles.

> Aaron, please tell us you're not serious...


Are you trying to make the case that the NEA is interested in American
kids being properly educated..........

are you stupid, or what?


> 
> --
> Cheers,
> 
> Sam


-- 
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642

I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
    premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
    you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
    you are lazy, stupid people"

J: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
   challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
   between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
   Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole

A:  The wise man is mocked by fools.

B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.

C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
   sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
   that she doesn't like.
 
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.

E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
   ...despite (D) above.

F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
   response until their behavior improves.

G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
   adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.

H:  Knackos...you're a retard.

------------------------------

From: Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Anonymous Wintrolls and Authentic Linvocates - Re: R.E. Ballard says 
Linux growth stagnating
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 19:57:40 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] () wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2000 14:07:20 -0300, Roberto Alsina
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 24 Aug 2000 12:05:51 -0300, Roberto Alsina
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >"T. Max Devlin" escribió:
> >> >>
> >> >> Said Roberto Alsina in comp.os.linux.advocacy;
> >> >> >"T. Max Devlin" escribió:
> >> >>    [...]
> >> >> >Neither are they required to pay TT (not Qt) a licensing fee
now in
> >> >> >order to benefit from Linux. Max, you have no idea of what you
are
> >> >> >talking about (again).
> >> >>
> >> >> And you, Roberto, are still trying to avoid correcting the
matter.  Are
> >> >> you so incapable of grasping abstractions that you cannot
substitute
> >> >> "QT" for "the commercial entity responsible for QT"?
> >> >
> >> >Are you so incapable of dealing wuith reality that you can't see a
> >> >company and a product are not the same thing, and keep on using
> >> >the wrong one?
> >>
> >>         I'm sorry but you've failed this sitting of the Turing
Test.
> >>
> >>         Please try again. But remember, you can only reschedule the
> >>         test after 30 days and you can only take the test 3 times
> >>         in any 12 month period.
> >
> >Such a stupid attempt at flame can only come from you, I guess.
>
>       You're the one trying to parse english as if it were pascal.

Whatever, jedi. You know, you and Max are very much alike.
I bet you find each other intellectually challenging.

--
Roberto Alsina


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...)
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 16:04:11 -0400

ZnU wrote:
> 
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Aaron R. Kulkis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > ZnU wrote:
> 
> > > > But the USA is the only country where the leftists have committed
> > > > to causing societal collapse from within.  If the US is weakened,
> > > > the rest of the world is easily blackmailed.
> > >
> > > What exactly are you talking about? The more "leftist" countries, on
> > > average, have lower poverty rates and better educational systems than
> > > we
> > > do. How do you account for this? Do they simply have fewer of these
> >
> > The leftists in THIS country are in collaboration with the leftists
> > in the other countries.  The overall goal is to weaken the US relative
> > to the other countries, so that the US will become even weaker than
> > them.
> 
> Why? What would they gain?

Their long term goal is to replace the US government with a Communist
one.


> What is your evidence for this absurd claim?

1. The behavior of Communists in every country which they have tried
to take over (including those which they successfully took over):
Step one: Take control of the schools and make sure that
        all children are indoctrinated with communism.

2. Comments of various teachers who are NEA members.

3. The NEA got school elections separated from other elections, so
        that they can skew the vote towards NEA-backed candidates.

> 
> > Simply put...a large percentage of the education establishment
> > should be put on trial for treason.
> >
> >
> > Do you not have a brain capable of figuring this out yourself?
> 
> Damnit! Why do they never tell me about the vast left-wing conspiracies?
> 

Are you really so naive as to think it's the enemy's duty to tell you
their plans for defeating you?

-- 
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642

I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
    premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
    you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
    you are lazy, stupid people"

J: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
   challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
   between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
   Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole

A:  The wise man is mocked by fools.

B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.

C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
   sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
   that she doesn't like.
 
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.

E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
   ...despite (D) above.

F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
   response until their behavior improves.

G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
   adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.

H:  Knackos...you're a retard.

------------------------------

From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...)
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 16:05:31 -0400

Roberto Alsina wrote:
> 
> "Aaron R. Kulkis" escribió:
> >
> > Roberto Alsina wrote:
> > >
> > > "Aaron R. Kulkis" escribió:
> > >
> > > > > > But the USA is the only country where the leftists have committed
> > > > > > to causing societal collapse from within.  If the US is weakened,
> > > > > > the rest of the world is easily blackmailed.
> > > > >
> > > > > What exactly are you talking about? The more "leftist" countries, on
> > > > > average, have lower poverty rates and better educational systems than we
> > > > > do. How do you account for this? Do they simply have fewer of these
> > > >
> > > > The leftists in THIS country are in collaboration with the leftists
> > > > in the other countries.  The overall goal is to weaken the US relative
> > > > to the other countries, so that the US will become even weaker than
> > > > them.  Simply put...a large percentage of the education establishment
> > > > should be put on trial for treason.
> > > >
> > > > Do you not have a brain capable of figuring this out yourself?
> > >
> > > Aaron, are you claiming that there is a conspiracy between school
> > > teachers in the US, and, say, the french education minister, to
> > > make the french students superior to the US ones?
> >
> > The NEA leadership is overrun with Marxists.
> 
> What's the NEA?

National Education Association, the leftist union that controls the
teaching establishment.

Read any of their publications, and it is quite obvious that they are
a bunch of Marxists.


> 
> --
> Roberto Alsina


-- 
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642

I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
    premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
    you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
    you are lazy, stupid people"

J: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
   challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
   between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
   Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole

A:  The wise man is mocked by fools.

B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.

C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
   sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
   that she doesn't like.
 
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.

E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
   ...despite (D) above.

F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
   response until their behavior improves.

G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
   adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.

H:  Knackos...you're a retard.

------------------------------

From: Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: [OT] Bush v. Gore on taxes (was: Re: Would a M$ Voluntary Split ...)
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 17:26:27 -0300

"Aaron R. Kulkis" escribió:
> 
> Roberto Alsina wrote:
> >
> > "Aaron R. Kulkis" escribió:
> > >
> > > Roberto Alsina wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "Aaron R. Kulkis" escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > > > But the USA is the only country where the leftists have committed
> > > > > > > to causing societal collapse from within.  If the US is weakened,
> > > > > > > the rest of the world is easily blackmailed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What exactly are you talking about? The more "leftist" countries, on
> > > > > > average, have lower poverty rates and better educational systems than we
> > > > > > do. How do you account for this? Do they simply have fewer of these
> > > > >
> > > > > The leftists in THIS country are in collaboration with the leftists
> > > > > in the other countries.  The overall goal is to weaken the US relative
> > > > > to the other countries, so that the US will become even weaker than
> > > > > them.  Simply put...a large percentage of the education establishment
> > > > > should be put on trial for treason.
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you not have a brain capable of figuring this out yourself?
> > > >
> > > > Aaron, are you claiming that there is a conspiracy between school
> > > > teachers in the US, and, say, the french education minister, to
> > > > make the french students superior to the US ones?
> > >
> > > The NEA leadership is overrun with Marxists.
> >
> > What's the NEA?
> 
> National Education Association, the leftist union that controls the
> teaching establishment.

Then you have not answered my question.

-- 
Roberto Alsina

------------------------------

From: Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Anonymous Wintrolls and Authentic Linvocates - Re: R.E. Ballard says 
Linux growth stagnating
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 20:11:12 GMT



I have decided to post a second reply to this message.
Sorry for the poor netiquette, but this one is really
much better. I should supercede the other, but I lost
the ID.

[snip]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Said Roberto Alsina in comp.os.linux.advocacy;
>    [...]
> >Oh, right. Just because what you said is not true, it's no reason
> >to retract. How nice.
>
> Just because you claim it is not true is not reason for me to retract
> it.  I notice you're not actually able to provide any reason for me to
> actually believe it is not true.

Oh, Max, but I AM able to provide reasons for you to believe what
you said is not true: YOU SAID IT WAS NOT TRUE!

Allow me here to go back to what exactly Max and I are writing about.

Max had said:

"Screw KDE.  Its a commercial development project."

later he said:

"Just because QT is the product, not KDE, and the
company's name isn't KDE, but Troll Tech, is no
reason for me to retract[...]".

So, you see, he just said something we all (except him
at the time, maybe) know to be false, then he says
that because SOMETHING ELSE (I am guessing here):

"Screw Troll Tech. Qt is a commercial development project"

Something else where EVERY NOUN is different! is
(in his own mind) true, he should not retract his
false statement.

This, I believe, paints entirely what a liar T. Max
Devlin is. He has no respect whatsoever for truth,
and he has no respect for his readers, since he
expects this obvious lies to go unchallenged.

As a cop in Homicide said, do you believe I'm a moron?
Are you saving your good lies for the next cop?

T. Max, I will give you one last chance in this threadlet:
apologize. Apologize quick.

You are a liar, and, amazingly, a dishonest moron
that is stupid enough to believe we will not
notice. That's insulting.

--
Roberto Alsina



Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: Mig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NETCRAFT: I'm confused
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 22:35:36 +0200

Nico Coetzee wrote:
> Every now and then some M$ preacher refers to netcraft for this or that
> stat. Well, am I the only one that find it strange that Apache is the
> only platform currently with a obvious positive trendline? Even the M$
> line has a downward curve since just before 2000.
> 
> And Linux remain the dominant OS platform, no matter how you look at it.
> 
> Don't you people find this funny?

Lets use som real facts about big sites.

The official list for week 33 here is

1) www.jubii.dk          users       2.2 mio  server  Microsoft IIS NT
2) www.forum.dk                     0.7 mio              Microsoft  IIS NT
3) www.sol.dk                         0.7 mio             Apache  Solaris 
4) www.opasia.dk                    0.8 mio             Enterprise Solaris  
5) www.krak.dk                        0.5 mio            Microsoft IIS on NT
6) www.tv2.dk                         0,5 mio             Apache  Linux     
7) www.degulesider.dk              0.3 mio            Apache Solaris
8) www.denblaaavis.dk             0.1 mio            Microsoft ISS NT 
9) www.netlogin.dk                   0.4 mio            unknown
10) www.sportal.dk                   0.1 mio            Domino in AIX

Domains are sorted by the number of read pages. The numbers are from 1.5mio
to 15 mio per week.

It looks as IIS and NT are doing quite well on big sites :-)

Yes i know that IIS sites tend to have more machines (take a look for
yourself at the NT topsites) but they are nevertheless doing very well.

Cheers




------------------------------

From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NETCRAFT: I'm confused
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 16:49:20 -0400

Mig wrote:
> 
> Nico Coetzee wrote:
> > Every now and then some M$ preacher refers to netcraft for this or that
> > stat. Well, am I the only one that find it strange that Apache is the
> > only platform currently with a obvious positive trendline? Even the M$
> > line has a downward curve since just before 2000.
> >
> > And Linux remain the dominant OS platform, no matter how you look at it.
> >
> > Don't you people find this funny?
> 
> Lets use som real facts about big sites.
> 
> The official list for week 33 here is
> 
> 1) www.jubii.dk          users       2.2 mio  server  Microsoft IIS NT
> 2) www.forum.dk                     0.7 mio              Microsoft  IIS NT
> 3) www.sol.dk                         0.7 mio             Apache  Solaris
> 4) www.opasia.dk                    0.8 mio             Enterprise Solaris
> 5) www.krak.dk                        0.5 mio            Microsoft IIS on NT
> 6) www.tv2.dk                         0,5 mio             Apache  Linux
> 7) www.degulesider.dk              0.3 mio            Apache Solaris
> 8) www.denblaaavis.dk             0.1 mio            Microsoft ISS NT
> 9) www.netlogin.dk                   0.4 mio            unknown
> 10) www.sportal.dk                   0.1 mio            Domino in AIX
> 
> Domains are sorted by the number of read pages. The numbers are from 1.5mio
> to 15 mio per week.
> 
> It looks as IIS and NT are doing quite well on big sites :-)


Is that the whole site, or JUST THE HOME PAGE???

-- 
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
ICQ # 3056642

I: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
    premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
    you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
    you are lazy, stupid people"

J: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
   challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
   between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
   Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole

A:  The wise man is mocked by fools.

B: "Jeem" Dutton is a fool of the pathological liar sort.

C: Jet plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a method of
   sidetracking discussions which are headed in a direction
   that she doesn't like.
 
D: Jet claims to have killfiled me.

E: Jet now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
   ...despite (D) above.

F: Neither Jeem nor Jet are worthy of the time to compose a
   response until their behavior improves.

G: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
   adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.

H:  Knackos...you're a retard.

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.advocacy) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************

Reply via email to