Linux-Advocacy Digest #489, Volume #33 Tue, 10 Apr 01 15:13:05 EDT
Contents:
Re: Need your recommendation for a full-featured text editor ("Dan Miller")
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. (Rob
Robertson)
Re: Need your recommendation for a full-featured text editor ("Dan Miller")
Re: Need your recommendation for a full-featured text editor ("Dan Miller")
Re: MS and ISP's (T. Max Devlin)
Re: Need your recommendation for a full-featured text editor (Skybuck)
Re: Need your recommendation for a full-featured text editor (Thore B. Karlsen)
Re: Need your recommendation for a full-featured text editor (Dave Martel)
Re: Undeniable proof that Aaron R. Kulkis is a hypocrite, and a (WesTralia)
Re: REPOST: Re: Communism confession
Re: REPOST: Re: Communism confession
Re: Undeniable proof that Aaron R. Kulkis is a hypocrite, and a (WesTralia)
Re: REPOST: Re: Communism confession
Re: Communism confession
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Dan Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.comp.shareware.programmer,comp.editors,comp.lang.java.help,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.java.softwaretools,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Need your recommendation for a full-featured text editor
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 10:58:12 -0700
However, having used both VSE and MultiEdit, I have to say that IMHO VSE has
little to offer over ME that justifies double the price. Both have
excellent Brief emulation (which is why I use them), and intuitive syntax
highlighting.
VSE has a nice function browser and file browser, which ME lacks. The
beautify function is also very well done, and ME lacks that as well. OTOH,
ME handles tags MUCH more easily, and shows bookmarks on the editor screen
(which I *really* like). Outside of these functions, the two are pretty
much equivalent. Trial versions of both are downloadable. But ME is around
$120 street, VSE is around $200.
And, at the risk of getting seriously flamed, *both* programs make XEmacs
look clutzy and arcane... but then, XEmacs is free...
"Randall Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2001 14:29:14 -0700 esteemed Dan Miller did'st hold forth
thusly:
> > So, you're recommending Brief?? It hasn't been available for awhile...
>
> Visual Slick Edit has excellent Brief emulation. I use that with some
additional
> CUA extensions and with some commands that the VSE people added.
>
> Even for someone who uses VSE with a different key mapping the macros for
> providing the Brief-specific features can be mapped to key combinations
and are
> quite helpful. Column range select and the Brief style of pasting and
cursor
> positioning are just two that come to mind.
------------------------------
From: Rob Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:00:13 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
silverback wrote:
>
> Rob Robertson wrote:
<etc,... snip>
> >> >> >> >What part of Islamic theology specifies the vertical integration of
> >> >> >> >industry within the country.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> fascism is corporate rule dummy. Maybe you should educate yerself and
> >> >> >> find out how many of those Iranian corporations are controlled by the
> >> >> >> religious allyotahs.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > So if the Ayatollahs who constitute the ruling *state* power control
> >> >> >those Iranian corporations, how does that support your "fascism is
> >> >> >corporate rule" thesis, Glen?
> >> >>
> >> >> [Scott Erb = disingenuous fraud] is playing dum.... err forgot who I was
> >> >> replying to there folks excuse me. [Scott Erb = disingenuous fraud] doesn't
> >> >> have to play dumb he is dumb. Gee [Scott Erb = disingenuous fraud] you
> >> >> might do a little checking and when you do you will find that the
> >> >> Ayatollahs own and control those corporations.
> >> >
> >> > Right. Fascism is characterized by the *state-directed* control of
> >> >the economy, not societal control by corporations. You and I have had
> >> >this conversation several times in the recent past, but only now do
> >> >you recognize that it is the state rulers controlling businesses that
> >> >constitutes fascism, not rule by corporations.
> >>
> >> wrong again [Scott Erb = disingenuous fraud] under fascism the corporations
> >> are the government.
> >
> > Oh dear, this really is getting 'complex' now. Up above you say that "those
> >Iranian corporations are controlled by the religious allyotahs [sic]", which
> >to me means that the *political* leaders (the allosaurus's, or whatever) are
> >in control of the *business* leaders, not the other way around. That's what
> >I'd said to you many times, as noted in the replays which you deleted (leftist
> >censorship in action again, eh Glen?).
>
> it figures that the simple minded lying [Scott Erb = disingenuous fraud] would
> be unable to understand.
I've explained it to you many, many times over the past few months, Glen, and
I've explained and paraphrased it several times in this thread (and the proof
of that is in this very post). I think that you're just upset because I found
you eventually agreeing with me that fascism is the state-directed control of
the economy as you note with your 'Ayatollah Fascism' comment above, and that
I would connect that back to your fascist call for the government take-over of
the electricity industry in California.
Not very good advertisement for your book _The Nazi Hydra_, Glen!
> > You repeat the claim that "the Ayatollahs own and control those corporations",
> >and at the risk of being redundant and repetitious, I'd note that Ayatollahs
> >are the *political* leaders. Now you contradict *yourself* (while leaving in
> >the evidence of the contradiction in your response, oddly enough) when you
> >claim that "the corporations are the government".
> >
> >> > Do you remember this exchange, Glen?;
> >>
> >> i remember yer a lying [Scott Erb = disingenuous fraud].
> >>
> >> remainder of this lying [Scott Erb = disingenuous fraud]'s tripe snipped,.
> >> He doesn;t have a point and is prone to lying.
> >
> > Au contraire, mon frere. The point I've been trying to make all along has
> >been that fascism is the state-directed *control* of the economy as opposed
> >to communism's state *ownership* of industry. You echoed my sentiment above
> >with your 'fascist Iran' claim, and I'd also note the irony of your calls
> >for the government takeover of the California electricity industry, which
> >is much more like fascism than my calls for laissez-faire capitalism.
> >
> > Thank you for the pleasant discussion.
_
Rob Robertson
Got freedom?
http://www.lewRockwell.com
http://www.free-market.net
http://www.mises.org
http://www.hazlitt.org
http://www.antiwar.com
http://www.unionsquarejournal.com
http://www.libertocracy.com
http://www.unknownideal.com
http://www.self-gov.org
http://www.lp.org
------------------------------
From: "Dan Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.comp.shareware.programmer,comp.editors,comp.lang.java.help,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.java.softwaretools,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Need your recommendation for a full-featured text editor
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 11:01:31 -0700
"Dave Martel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2001 14:29:14 -0700, "Dan Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >"Craig Kelley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> "Paul Kinnucan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> I must throw in my vote for XEmacs/Emacs as well (XEmacs is just
> >> prettier); although a programmer's editor is much like a choice of
> >> underware: use what's comfortable for you, and avoid the ones that
> >> rub you the wrong way.
> >>
> >So, you're recommending Brief?? It hasn't been available for awhile...
>
> Brief's the best programmer's editor I ever used. Despite
> compatability claims I've never found another editor that duplicates
> Brief's intuitiveness. Too bad Borland bought it up and then forgot
> about it.
>
I agree... I used Brief for over a decade, and *loved* it... it's still the
prototype for many of the capabilities that people expect to see in a
Dos/Windows editor. I've always resented Borland's grab; if they didn't
want to use the program, why did they buy it and kill it?? It's not like
they were trying to protect turf for their editor, whatever it was called...
But then, Borland has often been confused about what direction it was
going...
------------------------------
From: "Dan Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.editors,comp.lang.java.help,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.java.softwaretools,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Need your recommendation for a full-featured text editor
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 11:09:39 -0700
The vim variant supports syntax hiliting, but it's awkward to configure, and
transferring your configurations (especially custom color pallettes) to
other machines requires much more than just copying .vimrc (unfortunately).
I use the syntax hiliting on my main linux development machine, but on all
the other machines I just use default settings. I know I can just set some
environment variables, but that hasn't worked consistently from machine to
machine.
OTOH, when I do serious development, I telnet the files to my Windows
machine and use a real editor!!
Dan (the Windows drudge) Miller
"Randall Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2001 06:00:03 GMT esteemed JLI did'st hold forth thusly:
> > For simple editing work vi is properly the best tool on UNIX.
>
> Does it do color syntax coding or language and library sensitive code
expansion?
>
> Its been a long time since I used vi and it was the second editor I
learned to
> use. But I think perhaps I should learn it again to help when
administering
> Linux and Unix boxes.
>
>
------------------------------
From: T. Max Devlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: MS and ISP's
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 18:10:45 GMT
Said Chad Myers in alt.destroy.microsoft on Tue, 10 Apr 2001 02:54:57
[...]
>The only thing Microsoft has a monopoly on, it seems, is the brain
>power, the succesful management, and the competency to create a world-class
>OS in a corporate environment WHILE making money at the same time.
You know, if it weren't patently obvious to computer professionals that
this "world-class OS' is an unreliable piece of crap, you might have a
point there, Chad. As it stands, though, it kind of blows your theory,
big time.
--
T. Max Devlin
*** The best way to convince another is
to state your case moderately and
accurately. - Benjamin Franklin ***
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Skybuck)
Crossposted-To:
24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.comp.shareware.programmer,comp.editors,comp.lang.java.help,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.java.softwaretools,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Need your recommendation for a full-featured text editor
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 18:04:21 GMT
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:34:07 GMT, Randall Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Mon, 09 Apr 2001 22:41:02 GMT esteemed Skybuck did'st hold forth thusly:
>> Let me just say I love textpad 4.
>
>Is this free?
Absolutely :) Well the evaluation version anyway... you can just keep
using it.
>On what operating systems?
>From the site:
"Minimum requirements are Microsoft Windows 95 or NT 3.51, and TextPad
is supported on Windows 98, ME, NT 4 and 2000. "
>Where's it available from?
www.textpad.com
Can you believe it ? :)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thore B. Karlsen)
Crossposted-To:
24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.comp.shareware.programmer,comp.editors,comp.lang.java.help,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.java.softwaretools,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Need your recommendation for a full-featured text editor
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 18:24:39 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:22:26 GMT, Randall Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sure, Emacs is configurable, but only with a lot of work. And even then it
>> might not be the right editor for you, so it's not the right answer for
>> everyone.
>The reason I've never tried Emacs is that some of the people who have claim that
>it is hard to configure. Then you find people who say it is easy to configure
>but one has no way of knowing how long they've used it and how long it took them
>to get to the point where they'd call it easy.
It _is_ hard to configure, unless you happen to be so insane as to like the
emacs defaults. I don't. I don't dismiss emacs as being useless, but the
emacs defaults are so far off from anything I would consider useful that it
just takes too much work to get it to work _with_ me, instead of _against_
me. Emacs out of the box is just as annoying to me as the Microsoft Office
paper clip. It just tries to do too much. The difference is that the Office
assistant is intelligent enough to understand when it's not wanted, while
emacs isn't.
>I want to install an editor, go to a menu pop-down that is labelled something
>like "Key Mappings" and then get a dialog box that has radio buttons or a combo
>box that lets me select from a half dozen popular key mappings (vi, Brief, CUA,
>etc). If it requires downloading separate Lisp scripts and trying to understand
>the guts of hacked up Lisp macros to get it to work right then I'm really not
>interested.
vim is _very_ easy to configure. You have good help files that are easy to
maneuver, and the customization screens in emacs don't hold a candle to the
ease of use and maneuverability of the corresponding screens in vim.
--
"By the time we've finished with him, he won't know whether
he's Number Six or the cube root of infinity!"
------------------------------
From: Dave Martel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.comp.shareware.programmer,comp.editors,comp.lang.java.help,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.java.softwaretools,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Need your recommendation for a full-featured text editor
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 12:14:53 -0600
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001 10:58:12 -0700, "Dan Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>VSE has a nice function browser and file browser, which ME lacks. The
>beautify function is also very well done, and ME lacks that as well. OTOH,
>ME handles tags MUCH more easily, and shows bookmarks on the editor screen
>(which I *really* like). Outside of these functions, the two are pretty
>much equivalent. Trial versions of both are downloadable. But ME is around
>$120 street, VSE is around $200.
I just checked and VSE is still $295 for a single-user linux license
at their website, don't know about the street price. Even $200 seems a
bit stratospheric in the face of so many free alternatives.
Multiedit is $129 but I don't believe they make a linux version. The
version number hasn't been changed for quite some time, leading me to
wonder if they're continuing to improve it.
>And, at the risk of getting seriously flamed, *both* programs make XEmacs
>look clutzy and arcane... but then, XEmacs is free...
Agreed. I'm still trying out the various linux editors and haven't
settled on a particular one yet. So far most seem more than adequate
to the task. It's incomprehensible to me that someone would pay $300
for a single-platform closed-source programmer's editor, when there
are so many good multi-platform open-source editors to be had for
free.
------------------------------
From: WesTralia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Undeniable proof that Aaron R. Kulkis is a hypocrite, and a
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 13:19:25 -0500
+------------------------+
| |
| PLEASE |
| |
| Do not feed the |
| Wintroll. |
| |
| Thank you. |
| The Management |
| |
+----------+--+----------+
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
* @ @ ( ) * @ )|@ | / @ \ * * @* * +@
_)_()_(_(_|(__)_)_(|(_|/__/__)(_(_))_(_/)_
The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
>
> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
--
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: REPOST: Re: Communism confession
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 18:33:31 GMT
>>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
Aaron> Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 02 Apr 2001 10:39:46 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
>> >>
>> >> Aaron> You know...name some Communist-style government policies that
>> >> Aaron> you agree with.
>> >>
>> >> Can't think of any in the real world.
>> >
>> >then you're a Communist.
>>
>> Excuse me, but to ne a communist, don't you have to agree with other
>> communists?
Aaron> Ahall edited it, and then did a rogue cancel on my original post.
You are a liar. Did you actually go so far as to cancel your
original post (message id --- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
to cover up your failure to be able to read your own words?
What a cowardly lying forger you are.
>>
>> >Thank you for admitting that you are an enemy of the US Constitution.
>>
>> By disagreeing with communists?
>>
>> >This fact will be recorded for posterity.
>>
>> Your inability to read?
>>
>> >Heheheheheheh
>>
>> I imagine that with an "Igor" impersonation, makes you almost
>> bearable.
--
Andrew Hall
(Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: REPOST: Re: Communism confession
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 18:35:36 GMT
>>>>> Roberto Alsina writes:
Roberto> On Mon, 02 Apr 2001 14:17:09 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
>>>
Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
>>> >>
Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
>>> >> >>
Aaron> cHip wrote:
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Being a guy who has researched this a lot I'd like to comment on a few
>>> >> >> >> things.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> First of all, anyone who mentions Russian Communism, Chinese Communism,
>>> >> >> >> North Korean Communism, etc. as communism---sorry but you're wrong.
>>> >> >> >> Those are NOT communism, they are totalitarian governments. Basically
>>> >> >> >> they're dictaror governments (layman term, really authoritarian).
Anyone
>>> >> >> >> who critisizes communism for anything there just doesn't get it.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>
Aaron> Ah yes, the usual "that isn't *real* communism" lie.
>>> >> >>
Aaron> So...tell us, Mr Wise guy...why are there not *ANY* "real communist"
Aaron> countries in existance....and why is every country which calls itself
Aaron> Communist also a police state?
>>> >> >>
Aaron> Accuracy counts, so be precise.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Communism is a utopian idea which is completely incompatible with
>>> >> >> human nature. Hence any attempt to implement it will end in either
>>> >> >> capitulation or tyranny. Generally the latter, as anyone driven to
>>> >> >> take power is not likely to give it up.
>>> >>
Aaron> Very good, but that's very general and vague.
>>> >>
Aaron> I said be precise.
>>> >>
Aaron> You know...name some Communist-style government policies that
Aaron> you disagree with.
>>> >>
>>> >> Can't think of any in the real world.
>>>
Aaron> then you're a Communist.
>>>
>>> Because I do not agree with any of their policies?
>>
>> You just said that you can't think of any that you do disagree with.
Roberto> Interestingly enough, there are two versions of the "can you find"
statement
Roberto> in two posts. Yet, I can't find the original post that matches THIS ONE.
Roberto> My guess, Aaron just edited the quoted part when replying.
That is exactly what the liar did. The original had message id
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, and was on google/dejanews last
week. Perhaps his craven cowardice was so great that he canceled
his post.
Roberto> How ugly!
Pitiful and cowardly. Rather than admit he could not read his
own words, he stoops to lying and forgery. Pathetic.
--
Andrew Hall
(Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
------------------------------
From: WesTralia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: Undeniable proof that Aaron R. Kulkis is a hypocrite, and a
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 13:35:07 -0500
The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
>
> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, WesTralia
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote
> on Tue, 10 Apr 2001 10:12:23 -0500
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >"Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
> >>
> >> The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
> >> >
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >> > Assembly might become a lost art....
> >> >
> >>
> >> Personally, it's still my favorite type of programming...
> >> followed by microcoding.
> >>
> >> Because elegance and efficiency are closely tied at that level.
> >>
> >
> >
> >I think I am going to be sick!
>
> Eh? Please explain. Unless it's related to some personal vendetta
> between you and Aaron, in which case don't bother. :-)
>
Well, it's like this, I am going to be sick in Aaron's case in the same
sense that I would become sick if I saw Barbara Striesand (Babs) preaching
foreign policy and energy conservation.
For a Wintendo98 DosLuser, Aaron and microcoding seem like strange bedfellows.
Translation: BS!
OUTED! LOL!
--
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: REPOST: Re: Communism confession
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 18:39:10 GMT
>>>>> The Ghost In The Machine writes:
The> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Aaron R. Kulkis
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The> wrote
The> on Mon, 02 Apr 2001 10:40:33 -0400
>> 4$-__-$_-%$_---$$$@news.noc.cabal.int>:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
>>>
Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
>>> >>
Aaron> cHip wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Being a guy who has researched this a lot I'd like to comment on a few
>>> >> >> things.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> First of all, anyone who mentions Russian Communism, Chinese Communism,
>>> >> >> North Korean Communism, etc. as communism---sorry but you're wrong.
>>> >> >> Those are NOT communism, they are totalitarian governments. Basically
>>> >> >> they're dictaror governments (layman term, really authoritarian). Anyone
>>> >> >> who critisizes communism for anything there just doesn't get it.
>>> >> >>
>>> >>
Aaron> Ah yes, the usual "that isn't *real* communism" lie.
>>> >>
Aaron> So...tell us, Mr Wise guy...why are there not *ANY* "real communist"
Aaron> countries in existance....and why is every country which calls itself
Aaron> Communist also a police state?
>>> >>
Aaron> Accuracy counts, so be precise.
>>> >>
>>> >> Communism is a utopian idea which is completely incompatible with
>>> >> human nature. Hence any attempt to implement it will end in either
>>> >> capitulation or tyranny. Generally the latter, as anyone driven to
>>> >> take power is not likely to give it up.
>>>
Aaron> Very good, but that's very general and vague.
>>>
Aaron> I said be precise.
>>>
Aaron> You know...name some Communist-style government policies that
Aaron> you agree with.
>>>
>>> Can't think of any in the real world.
>>
>> then you're a Communist.
>>
>> Thank you for admitting that you are an enemy of the US Constitution.
>>
>> This fact will be recorded for posterity.
>>
>> Heheheheheheh
His original post is still on google/dejanews, search for message
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
He is a lying cowardly forger, and now you all know it too.
--
Andrew Hall
(Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Communism confession
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 18:43:40 GMT
>>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
>>
Aaron> chrisv wrote:
>> >>
>> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >The question is irrelevant to Mr. Kulkis' cowardly forging and lying
>> >> >to try and coverup his own silly mistake.
>> >>
>> >> "Try" he did. Succeed, he did not. Kulkis has been OUTED! LOL!
>>
Aaron> Wrong. ahall is the one who committed the forgery.
>>
>> Liar.
>>
>> Anyone that wishes to see his forgery in action look
>> up the following posts on google/dejanews
>>
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> You are a cowardly, lying forger.
Aaron> Whatever, commie.
Let me add stupid to the above list.
I am libertarian, you are totalitarian and an
enemy of freedom.
You are also a stupid, lying, cowardly forger.
And lots of other people know it now too.
--
Andrew Hall
(Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
