Linux-Advocacy Digest #871, Volume #33 Tue, 24 Apr 01 09:13:05 EDT
Contents:
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. (Roberto
Alsina)
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. (Roberto
Alsina)
Re: bank switches from using NT 4 (mlw)
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. (Roberto
Alsina)
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. (Roberto
Alsina)
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. (Roberto
Alsina)
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. (Roberto
Alsina)
Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day. (Roberto
Alsina)
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males (Roberto Alsina)
Re: Blame it all on Microsoft (Bernd Paysan)
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males (Bud Frawley)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Date: 24 Apr 2001 12:45:44 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 23 Apr 2001 19:53:55 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:42:42 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 13:24:38 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:03:29 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:49:05 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>>>> >> >> >taking random, unrelated snippets out of context is not victory.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> It is fun. Fun is a small victory.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >So, Roberto, have you stopped raping your daughter?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Fallacy of false dichotomy.
>>>> >
>>>> >Bzzzzzt! wrong.
>>>> >
>>>> >If it's a false dichotomy, then surely you can tell us what the dichotomy is....
>>>>
>>>> Bzzzt. Not everything is a dichotomy.
>>>> In this case, in particular, you are presenting something that is NOT
>>>> a dichotomy as if it were one. That's why it's a FALSE dichotomy.
>>>
>>>Then tell us what is the dichotomy which I supposedly presented?
>>
>>"Have you stopped raping your daughteri?" is a dichotomy.
>>
>>>> Don't they teach logic in Perdue?
>>>>
>>>> >> And a way too worn-out clichè.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Perhaps you need to learn new tactics, Aaron. This one is stale.
>>>> >
>>>> >the words "false premise" means nothing to you, does they?
>>>>
>>>> Well, considering I was using no false premise in the statement
>>>> you replied to, it means "non sequitur" right now.
>>>>
>>>> It also means "one of the ways in which your tactic is flawed".
>>>
>>>Clue for the really really really fucking clueless: I give Roberto the
>>>Answer to the first part of the post, and he STILL fucking misses it.
>>
>>You expect me to say that "false premise" is the right answer to your
>>question? Actually, that depends on whether I raped my daughter or
>>not. Since you don't know one way or the other, you were not using
>>a false premise, but an umproved assumption (different things).
>
>I thought you didn't have a daughter?
But did Aaron KNOW that when he wrote that? Believing is not
knowledge, regardless of what god tells you.
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Date: 24 Apr 2001 12:48:59 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:14:22 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:41:27 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 13:23:03 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:01:27 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:45:05 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>> >> >> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 09:34:40 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 01:03:12 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >Mathew wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Gunner© wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Mathew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >Slavery;child labour
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > As opposed to a 16 yr old working at Burger King?
>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> A 16 year old at Burger King, where they can only work part
>time,is
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> hardly comparable to 12-14 hour work days of children as young as
>6.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >In some parts of the world, such work is FAR more useful to the
>child
>> >> >> >> >> >> >than any high-end education (when living in a 3rd-world shithole,
>> >> >> >> >> >> >lessons on astrophysics are....a luxery. Food on the table is a
>> >> >> >> >> >> >necessity. Hope that helps).
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> There's a wide spectrum between no education and astrophysics.
>> >> >> >> >> >> And if you work 12 hours a day at a back-breaking job when you are
>> >> >> >> >> >> a kid, you don't get any education.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >What good is an education if you have starved to death?
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> The black-and-whiteness of your mind is amazing.
>> >> >> >> >> There is a solution to this: feed the kid at (public) school.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Where does the money come from to provide this food?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Taxes, of course.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >You think food just appears out of thin air?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Not at all, as should be obvious by the next statement.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Of course you would believe that kid is stealing your money.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >If you can't afford to have kids, then maybe you shouldn't have them
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The kid is already there, Aaron. And I can afford them just fine, thank
>> >> >> >> you very much. And I can find a woman to have them with me without
>> >> >> >> the incentive of money or citizenship.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Any guy can find "a woman"...if he's willing to settle for low-quality,
>> >> >> >self-centered, conceited, narcisisstic, ill-mannered, holier-than-thou
>> >> >> >sluts like what's offered by American society.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >I, on the other hand, have MUCH higher standards.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You prefer submissive women willing to have sex with you[1]. Not
>> >> > ^^^^^^^^^^
>> >> >Spot the feminist lie.
>> >>
>> >> I can not be a feminist.
>> >>
>> >> >Clue for the clueless:
>> >> >Call a Russian woman submissive, and she'll jaw 1/2 way across the room.
>> >>
>> >> Well, I know some russian women. They are pretty submissive.
>> >
>> >Compared to violent Latin American assholes like yourself, I'll bet.
>>
>> There's plenty of violent Latin Americans indeed, me not included.
>> They seemed submissive to me, a cuddly teddy-bear-like fuzzy thing.
>
>You keep telling yourself that, greaseball.
Well, women keep telling me that.
>> Then again, I tend to provoke that reaction in women. Maybe it's my
>> imposing physique, maybe it's the brilliancy of my intellect,
>> maybe it's my astonishing modesty.
>
>How do they feel about your brilliantly intellectual opinion
>that rapists shouldn't be killed on the spot?
They emotionally disagree, but intellectually agree. I only date
smart women. They are more fun.
>> >> On the other hand, I never mentioned her being russian. Why do you
>> >> think I was talking about her?
>> >
>> >I wasn't. You were talking about women I've associated with.
>>
>> So, you only associated with russian women? That means you only
>> have been associated with two women?
>
>No...I said that in my experience with Russian women, if you were to call
>one of them submissive, they would slap you silly just to get that silly
>idea out of your head.
I never mentioned russian women were submissive until you brought them
up. And I *have* told russian women that they were submissive, and they
agreed, blaming their repressive education. Perhaps their submissiveness
made them agree?
>> >Your confusion is self-induced (no surprise).
>>
>> I never expected you to be practically a virgin!
>
>Congratulations, I'm not.
Ok, I will remove the "practically".
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: mlw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy
Subject: Re: bank switches from using NT 4
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:55:17 -0400
Jan Johanson wrote:
>
> "mlw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Jon Johansan wrote:
> > >
> > > But I stated a fact.
> >
> > You stated an opinion, pure and simple. You can't assume that you know
> anything
> > about what I think.
>
> I based my comment upon reading your non-stop spewing of blind hatred for
> anything remotely related to MS. I've never seen you once give quarter to
> any MS product and given that MS products do not universally 'suck' it's
> obvious your opinion...
You don't even know me. I am a published writer, and have published how to
write Windows NT/95 drivers from the same source code. I have written articles
describing the object oriented nature of Windows and how to use the ability to
subclass Windows to make programming easier.
I have written software for every version of Windows, I have written software
from everything from NT Kernel (and Windows DOS/VxDs) to win32 applications.
To say I have a "blind hatred of Microsoft" you make some assumptions about me,
which are not true. As a professional software developer. Someone who has been
doing it since the late '70s, as someone who as worked on Solaris, VMS, all
versions of DOS, several variants of *NIX (including BSD and Linux), and more.
I am quite capable of making "informed" not "blind" evaluations. Windows 9x/ME
is a joke. It is nothing more than a badly written DOS extender with tons of
crap piled on.
Windows NT, the kernel used to be pretty good. (I have said this on numerous
occasions) In NT 4.0 they moved the GUI and graphical components into kernel
space. This is a huge strategic mistake if you want to make a stable OS.
Microsoft does not make "good" software, they make, probably, the worst
software I have ever seen. They can't design an API if their life depended on
it. They still think in terms of DOS. (Why the hell have not driver letters
completely gone away?)
The Windows API is not stable, not standard, and the assumptions it makes about
the lower level OS preclude it from being implemented efficiently on stable
operating systems.
I don't have a blind hatred of Microsoft, I have a healthy disdain for poor
technology. A lot of which spews from Microsoft every quarter.
--
I'm not offering myself as an example; every life evolves by its own laws.
========================
http://www.mohawksoft.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Date: 24 Apr 2001 12:52:38 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:19:57 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:42:42 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 13:24:38 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:03:29 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:49:05 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>> >> >> >> >taking random, unrelated snippets out of context is not victory.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> It is fun. Fun is a small victory.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >So, Roberto, have you stopped raping your daughter?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Fallacy of false dichotomy.
>> >> >
>> >> >Bzzzzzt! wrong.
>> >> >
>> >> >If it's a false dichotomy, then surely you can tell us what the dichotomy is....
>> >>
>> >> Bzzzt. Not everything is a dichotomy.
>> >> In this case, in particular, you are presenting something that is NOT
>> >> a dichotomy as if it were one. That's why it's a FALSE dichotomy.
>> >
>> >Then tell us what is the dichotomy which I supposedly presented?
>>
>> "Have you stopped raping your daughteri?" is a dichotomy.
>
>If it's a dichotomy, then please tell us the two sides of the false dichotomy.
The false dichotomy is that someone can only have stopped or not stopped.
One can also have not started.
>> >> Don't they teach logic in Perdue?
>> >> >> And a way too worn-out clichè.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Perhaps you need to learn new tactics, Aaron. This one is stale.
>> >> >
>> >> >the words "false premise" means nothing to you, does they?
>> >>
>> >> Well, considering I was using no false premise in the statement
>> >> you replied to, it means "non sequitur" right now.
>> >>
>> >> It also means "one of the ways in which your tactic is flawed".
>> >
>> >Clue for the really really really fucking clueless: I give Roberto the
>> >Answer to the first part of the post, and he STILL fucking misses it.
>>
>> You expect me to say that "false premise" is the right answer to your
>> question? Actually, that depends on whether I raped my daughter or
>> not.
>
>Well, if raping your daughter is *NOT* a false premise, then
>it must be a TRUE premise...
No, it's a premise for which you don't know the truth value.
Again, have you learned nothing?
>> And indeed what you did is also a false dichotomy.
>>
>> You need to take logic 101 stat!
>
>As i showed above, I know what a false dichotomy is,
Only when regurgitating.
>You, however, think that a false premise is a false dichotomy.
Actually no. In this case, you used a false premise to create
a false dichotomy, but there are false premises that don't lead
to false dichotomys and there are false dichotomys that are not
based on false premises.
This is just the intersection of two fallacies.
>therefore, I suggest that YOU go take that logic 101 course.
>(if you can find it)
Quick: what's the difference between a Felapton and a Darii?
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Date: 24 Apr 2001 12:53:34 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d'geezer@d'geezer.net <d'geezer@d'geezer.net> wrote:
>On 23 Apr 2001 19:56:30 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina) wrote:
>
>>d'geezer@d'geezer.net <d'geezer@d'geezer.net> wrote:
>>>On 23 Apr 2001 15:59:29 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina) wrote:
>>>
>>>>Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:03:29 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:49:05 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>> >taking random, unrelated snippets out of context is not victory.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is fun. Fun is a small victory.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So, Roberto, have you stopped raping your daughter?
>>>>>
>>>>>His daughter was raped be a raping intruder in his home, but of
>>>>>course since his daughter's life was not in danger and he believes
>>>>>all killing is wrong (unless YOUR life is threatened), he gave the
>>>>>raper some cookies and milk when he was done and sent him on his way.
>>>>
>>>>Well, shooting at someone that's raping a woman is somewhat dangerous
>>>>for the woman, is it not?
>>>
>>>For those who are bad shots. One can usually get extraordinarily to a rapist in
>>>the act.
>>
>>Get extraordinarily what?
>
>Typo. "close" is the word I lost. Thank you for pointing it out.
>
>>
>>>>I would rather hit him in the kidneys with
>>>>a blunt object.
>>>
>>>Peachy. Me too. THEN I'll shot him.
>>
>>Well, then you would probably go to jail, you know.
>>
>>>>Killing a rapist in the act of commiting a rape is not self defense.
>>>
>>>Oh? Ask the victim. Have you ever heard of AIDS?
>>
>>Did you miss the "self" in "self defense"?
>>
>>>Additionally we know that rather a large number of rapists decide, after all their
>>>fun is over, that they should not leave a witness.
>>
>>Innocent of murder until he actually kills someone, dude.
>>
>>>Yes, I'd say it is self defense. Shoot the fuckers.
>>>
>>>>It can be a justified murder, though. But self defense? Nah.
>>>
>>>You a law school grad, are you?
>>
>>Nah.
>>
>>>>I am amazed at how people will misrepresent anything in order to
>>>>make a bogus point.
>>>
>>>Yes, you do have considerably propensity for such.
>>
>>But I abstain from applying it almost all the time. Too bad
>>such self control is not common.
>>
>>--
>>Roberto Alsina
>
>That is all? All you can come up with is pointing out a typo?
Perhaps you missed the other three pieces of response? Perhaps
your eyes are failing you?
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Date: 24 Apr 2001 12:55:27 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 02:58:29 GMT, Michael Ejercito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 23 Apr 2001 12:42:35 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 01:03:12 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Mathew wrote:
>>>> A 16 year old at Burger King, where they can only work part time,is
>>>> hardly comparable to 12-14 hour work days of children as young as 6.
>>>
>>>In some parts of the world, such work is FAR more useful to the child
>>>than any high-end education (when living in a 3rd-world shithole,
>>>lessons on astrophysics are....a luxery. Food on the table is a
>>>necessity. Hope that helps).
>>
>>There's a wide spectrum between no education and astrophysics.
>>And if you work 12 hours a day at a back-breaking job when you are
>>a kid, you don't get any education.
> You learn how to work, which is more than what some people learn
>here.
You learn how to sniff glue in the streets, you learn how to get
molested, and yes, you learn how to work 12 hours for almost
nothing.
I don't want anyone to learn that.
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Date: 24 Apr 2001 12:56:09 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 03:00:55 GMT, Michael Ejercito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 23 Apr 2001 14:59:43 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:52:50 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Roberto Alsina wrote:
>>>> So, feeding the kid and giving him an education is a communist plot
>>>> to produce a viscious circle of communist indoctrination.
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, the kid should work 12 hours a day selling candy in the street
>>>> for the greater good of the world and the american way.
>>>
>>>
>>>If that's *HIS* choice, who are you to complain?
>>
>>He can choose to do that or die. That's no choice.
> Well, that is just nature. Nature is cruel.
I am amazed how such a socipath has not been convicted of anything
yet.
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To:
misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles,alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Communism, Communist propagandists in the US...still..to this day.
Date: 24 Apr 2001 12:57:11 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:12:05 -0700, Gunner © <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 23 Apr 2001 19:27:50 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina) wrote:
>
>>
>>The government should protect people from danger.
>>Isn't that why people should pay for the army?
>
>Wrong. No one is going to pay to give you your own guardian angel. We
>pay for the military to keep other nations from destroying our nation.
Is that not a danger? Is that not protection?
>Period. Now if you feel someone should keep you from danger.... you
>should seek a mental health professional immediately.
You need help.
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina)
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: 24 Apr 2001 12:58:57 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 17:21:53 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>WesTralia wrote:
>>
>> Chad Everett wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:13:44 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >WesTralia wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Roberto Alsina wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Aaron, why are you so scared of women?
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >> This is a question that needs asking? Hmmm... let's see:
>> > >>
>> > >> a) he has never had a date.
>> > >
>> > >15 girlfriends, lots of sex, no dates.
>> > >
>> >
>> > 1. May 1980 Penthouse centerfold.
>> > 2. May 1981 Penthouse centerfold.
>> > 3. May 1982 Penthouse centerfold.
>> > 4. May 1983 Penthouse centerfold.
>> > 5. May 1984 Penthouse centerfold.
>> > 6. May 1985 Penthouse centerfold.
>> > 7. May 1986 Penthouse centerfold.
>> > 8. May 1987 Penthouse centerfold.
>> > 9. May 1988 Penthouse centerfold.
>> > 10. May 1989 Penthouse centerfold.
>> > 11. May 1990 Penthouse centerfold.
>> > 12. May 1991 Penthouse centerfold.
>> > 13. May 1992 Penthouse centerfold.
>> > 14. May 1993 Penthouse centerfold.
>> > 15. May 1994 Penthouse centerfold.
>> >
>> > Lot's of sex: Right hand, left hand, right hand, left hand.....
>> >
>>
>> Aaron's hatred of women is really starting to perfectly fit the
>
>Hatred of male-hating sexism =/= hatred of women.
You said women are better off when they are not allowed to walk in
the street without male company.
That's pretty hateful.
--
Roberto Alsina
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 14:49:39 +0200
From: Bernd Paysan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.theory,comp.arch,comp.object
Subject: Re: Blame it all on Microsoft
Edward Rosten wrote:
> IIRC, Zuse had it working on a fully automatic (and turing-complete)
> machine in the early 40's: the Z3 (formerly the V3).
>
> The Germans did, in fact have real, working computers before anyone else.
Not "the Germans", the Z3 was just in Zuses' parent's living room (the
first home computer ;-), and the German war industry did not use
computers for calculation. After the war, Zuse applied for a patent on
the German PTO, and this application was rejected, because of prior art
;-). No, the examiner didn't know of Babbage's "analythic engine".
BTW: The Z3 is about 60 years old, it was first publically demonstrated
on May, 12th 1941.
--
Bernd Paysan
"If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself"
http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/
------------------------------
From: Bud Frawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 07:58:50 -0500
On 23 Apr 2001 14:47:38 -0500, Chad Everett said...
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 14:39:49 -0500, Bud Frawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> >On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 15:22:44 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis said...
> >> jet wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Bud Frawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 09:44:01 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis said...
> >> > > > Bud Frawley wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 08:13:02 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis said...
> >> > > > > > MH wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > "jet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >> > > > > > > news:9c06um$1o3m$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > MH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >> > > > > > > > news:vEFE6.1319$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > > Any man who supports Feminism is a self-flagellating
> >> > idiot.
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > Any man who thinks a woman should be paid the same for equal
> >> > work is a
> >> > > > > > > > > self
> >> > > > > > > > > > flagellating idiot?
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > No, just any man who marries one.
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Any man who marries a woman who thinks she should get paid the
> >> > same as a
> >> > > > > > > man
> >> > > > > > > > for the same work is a self flagellating idiot?
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > LOL.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > J
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Pay is not the issue. I've no problem with women getting equal
> >> > pay.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > But try to find a woman who TRULY does equal work...like coming in
> >> > early,
> >> > > > > > or staying late, as needed. Or going out of town on a business trip
> >> > > > > > on short notice....or transferring half way across the country (or
> >> > > > > > even to an office 20 miles farther from her house).
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Quite frankly...there are reasons why the STATISTICAL AVERAGE for
> >> > > > > > women's pay is so much lower than men...they refuse to go to the
> >> > > > > > same lengths that men will to *EARN* it'
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > LOL!!!!! I guess you just proved your not a manager! when my cousin
> >> > got
> >> > > > > promotyed to manager in his company he showed me the pay list! there
> >> > was
> >> > > > > 2 different pays 1 for men 1 for women! men got paid $13.00 an hour
> >> > when
> >> > > > > women got paid $9.00 an hour for the same shift! I told him it's not
> >> > fair
> >> > > > > and they should pay the same so he filed an greavence. they said no
> >> > way.
> >> > > > > he quit that job in a hurry! I bet they stop laughing when I call feds
> >> > on
> >> > > > > this one! they offered him mney to keep quiet but I said no way I'm
> >> > > > > keepiung quiet! this is gonna hit the papers when I start talking!
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Men show up for work more reliably.
> >> > >
> >> > > LOL!!!! ya right! I left out the part when he showed me there time cards
> >> > > because I knew you'd bite! the women get there every day ON TIME! when
> >> > > somebody's show's up late it's always a man! those are statistics my boy!
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Do you know how much a production work stoppage costs a factory?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > A hell of more than $4.00/hour.
> >> > >
> >> > > LOL! like they lower there prices when it stops! you do'nt pay for when
> >> > > it stops because the owner is right there! I guess you think he has to
> >> > > pay himself when it stops! LOL!!!!!
> >> > > >
> >> > > > As long as women insist on group rights, then they will suffer
> >> > > > group penalties as well.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > By the way, who put a gun to these women's heads and FORCED them
> >> > > > to accept $9.00.
> >> > >
> >> > > thank's for proving your a complete moron! they either take $9.00 or they
> >> > > get fired! that's as bad a holding a gun to there heads if you want to
> >> > > support a family!
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > It appears that management offered $9.00/hour, and they accepted.
> >> > >
> >> > > I'm gonna say this one more time so take the beans outa your ears THAT"S
> >> > > ALL THE JOB PAYS FOR WOMEN! maybe you should go back to the dumass farm!
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > When did he leave?
> >> >
> >> > J
> >>
> >> Oooooooooow, ppppppppppoooor pooooooooor strong victims.
> >>
> >> If women are every bit as capable as men, then how come they can't
> >> negotiate their pay?
> >>
> >>
> >gawd you gotta be deaf from you ca'nt hear so well! when a woman asks for
> >a raise alls they say is no way the company does'nt allow it! then what's
> >she gonna do? she's luckey if they do'nt fire her on the spot! when my
> >cousin owned a car dealer he tried to give his secretery a raise because
> >she made more money for the company then the salesmen but he could'nt
> >because company policy! his boss reamed him out for that little stunt! he
> >would of fired him for sure if he did'nt just land a deal for 40 cars at
> >full sticker!
>
> If your cousin owned the company, then who told him it was against company
> policy?
I guess you never heard of union! you ca'nt pay somebody more then the
contract and somebody less!
>
> How did the secretaty make more money for the company than the all the
> salesmen?
>
what a moron! I guess you do'nt know who spend's the most on dinner when
there doin a big deal! it's not the secretery that's for sure!
>
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
