Linux-Advocacy Digest #962, Volume #33 Thu, 26 Apr 01 21:13:02 EDT
Contents:
Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop (Nomen Nescio)
Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism) (GreyCloud)
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males (GreyCloud)
Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop (Nomen Nescio)
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males (GreyCloud)
Quicken for Linux??? (Al)
Palm Synching and Linux PIM (Al)
Re: Treason (was Re: Communism) (Matt Kennel)
Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males (GreyCloud)
Re: Why left-wing communist assholes hate Reagan. (was Re: (GreyCloud)
Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Nomen Nescio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 02:10:05 +0200 (CEST)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
>
> Aaron> Ray Fischer wrote:
> >>
> >> Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >Ray Fischer wrote:
> >> >> nunnayabidniz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> >homosexuality is not genetic, it is a choice.
> >> >>
> >> >> Why did you choose to be heterosexual?
> >> >
> >> >because successful DNA are those that reproduce.
> >>
> >> That isn't an answer. Why did YOU CHOOSE to be heterosexual?
> >>
> >> >There are only two explanations for homosexuality
> >>
> >> That you are capable of accepting. Given your obvious bigotry and
> >> scientific illiteracy, I'd hardly consider your opinion to be worth
> >> anything.
>
> Aaron> You're either born with it (genetic), or you choose it (for whatever
> Aaron> reason).
>
>
> Aaron> So, homosexuality is the result of either a genetic defect, or a choice.
>
>
> Aaron> There are *NO* other options.
>
> Either you are born left handed (genetic), or you choose to be left handed (for
> whatever reason).
>
> So, left-handedness is the result of either a genetic defect, or a choice.
>
> There are *NO* other option.
you have no chance to survive. make your time.
jackie 'anakin' tokeman
men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth - more than ruin,
more even than death
- bertrand russell
------------------------------
From: GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:13:16 -0700
Roberto Alsina wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 21:39:26 -0700, GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 11:02:54 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >Roberto Alsina wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:43:31 -0400, Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >Matthew Gardiner wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Roberto Alsina wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 13:02:24 GMT, chrisv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >> > >"Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > >>My house has over half a dozen guns, and ammunition for each,
> >> >> >> > >>and I haven't been convinced that I have any "right to kill"
> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> > >Says the outed idiot who advocates killing people who lawfully work
> >> >> >> > >toward different social and political goals than he does.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Not to mention he is the same guy who believes women are better off
> >> >> >> > in Saudi Arabia, and that ping calls nslookup.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > He is really a sort of renaissance idiot. Idiot in many fields at the
> >> >> >> > same time. A man who can be idiotic on any subject. A rainbow of
> >> >> >> > idiocy.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > --
> >> >> >> > Roberto Alsina
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> And you forgot the communist conspiracy theory.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Come visit the united states sometime. The communism is right out in the
>open.
> >> >>
> >> >> Well, seen from here, it's hard to tell a democrat from a republican.
> >> >> The US is so right-wing, what you call communists in most places are
> >> >
> >> >Here's a hint, Roberto.
> >> >
> >> >Right-wing vs. Left-wing is a false dichotomy. They are BOTH
> >> >forms of totalitarian socialism.
> >>
> >> Are you confessing to be a communist? After all, you advocate
> >> execution without trial of burglars. That's a pretty right-wingish
> >> thing to advocate.
> >
> >Haven't you ever heard of the "Kill a Burglar Law" of Louisiana??
>
> Nope. However, most those laws that are in effect in the US are
> considered rightist stuff, compared with the penal laws in
> effect in pretty much every other western democracy.
>
> --
> Roberto Alsina
It the right to defend oneself from crooks that enter your home.
If you kill a burglar breaking and entering or even stealing you have
the right to kill them. The crime rate dropped dramatically.
--
V
------------------------------
From: GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:18:46 -0700
BrendaLee wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
> >
> > Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
> > >>
> > Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
> > >> >>
> > Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
> > >> >> >>
> > Aaron> Brent R wrote:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> > Modern feminism decries "the patriarchy", and then whines for
> > >> >> >> >> > it to come back and clean up her diapers, because she still hasn't
> > >> >> >> >> > learned to shit in the toilet.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> Jesus man, do you really have to be that crude?
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >> Be careful Aaron, not all women are like that, I wouldn't even say
>the
> > >> >> >>
> > Aaron> I wasn't referring to "all women" is was referring to that body
> > Aaron> known as "feminism"
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> No, you are talking about a tiny minority of those women who
> > >> >> >> self-identify as feminist. For most women that means that women
> > >> >> >> have equal rights as men. Not the lunatic fringe that declare
> > >> >> >> all heterosexual sex is rape.
> > >> >>
> > Aaron> Thank you for agreeing with me.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> So you think most women that call themselves feminists
> > >> >> are not really feminists?
> > >>
> > Aaron> Most American women who don't even call themselves feminists have a
>SEVERE
> > Aaron> "women should be able to take anything a man has, and give nothing
> > Aaron> in return" attitude.
> >
> > Aaron> Those who do call themselves feminist advocate the use of kangaroo
> > Aaron> courts to accomplish it.
> >
> > >> You did not answer my questions.
> >
> > >> I am sorry your experience of American women has
> > >> been so poor.
> >
> > Aaron> Actually, my own PERSONAL experience has been ok. However, one does
> > Aaron> not need to personally experience divorce, etc. to know how badly the
> > Aaron> guys get shafted....all you need to do is pay attention to what is
> > Aaron> happening to all of the other men around you.
> >
> > I do. I have personally seen no bad cases. All the divorces
> > I personally know about were settled on child support, not
> > alimony. And in the cases where the woman was the larger breadwinner
> > and joint or paternal custody, the woman paid the child support.
>
> Just because you have never seen one does not mean they don't
> exist. For instance, my stepfather got divorced from his first
> wife. I have no idea what she said to that judge but he was taken
> for the ride of his life. Literally. He was forced to pay her
> 'alimony' for the ''rest of her life''. It was garnisheed from his
> wages automatically every week. On top of child support. And twice
> that I know of he went to court and pleaded that he had another
> family and could they lower it and he was told by the judge to
> *get another job*.
>
> I am sure this in not the norm, but it can, and did happen. And I
> witnessed it with my own eyes. I do believe nowadays there is a
> two-year-get-back-on-your-feet helping out period or something
> similar in certain cases.... At least that is what I have heard.
>
That is why I was very careful in knowing a woman first before getting
married.
It took me almost till retirement, but I finally found the woman of my
dreams and she likewise. It's better that way. I saw some pretty
horrible things happen to men in divorce court until we voted out this
judge for a better one. This current judge is more even handed about
things and more common sense is relied upon.
It's very important to get to know whats going on inside each others
head first before tying the knot.
> BrendaLee
> >
> > >> I personally know no women that are at all like
> > >> the ones you seem to think are most American women.
> >
> > Aaron> You must live in a cave.
> >
> > Nope, but perhaps I hang with a better crowd than you do.
> >
> > >> I have read about some, so I do know they exist. However
> > >> based on personal experience I conclude that they are rare.
> >
> > Aaron> Come out of your cave, ahole...
> >
> > Hang with a better crowd.
> >
> > (assuming you have any friends in the first place).
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Hall
> > (Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
>
> --
> BrendaLee
> Lady DreamCatcher
> --------------------
> http://www.cocreator.com/ehmka/
> -------------------------------------
>
> brendalee makes the world better by her presence in it.
>
> ~~jackie 'anakin' tokeman~~
>
> when you dance with an angel the angel don't change the angel
> changes you
> ~~jackie 'anakin' tokeman~~
--
V
------------------------------
From: Nomen Nescio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop
Crossposted-To: soc.singles,alt.linux,alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 02:20:06 +0200 (CEST)
t. max fagass:
> Said Nomen Nescio in alt.destroy.microsoft on Sat, 21 Apr 2001 00:40:43
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roberto Alsina) eeped:
> >> Chad Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >On 20 Apr 2001 20:37:40 GMT, Roberto Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >>Nomen Nescio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Davey) paused from prancing about in frilly
> >> >>>undergarments long enough to stick a gerbil in his bum and write:
> >> >>>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nomen Nescio
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> >> you're getting far too wound up for usenet, it's not that important, take
>a
> >> >>>> >> few valium and relax. It'll all seem better in the morning.
> >> >>>> >
> >> >>>> >you write like a homosexual
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> You write like someone who doubts their sexuality, it's normally the ones in
> >> >>>> the closet who go around calling everyone else homosexual.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>that's something homosexuals say
> >> >>
> >> >>Only insecure people care about others' tastes.
> >> >
> >> >Give him a break. He's a welfare recipient.
> >>
> >> Who cares?
> >
> >my victims
> > jackie 'anakin' tokeman
>
>
> BWAH-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!
jabba is that you?
> Jackie thinks he's got "victims". Bwah-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!
are you sure you want to play a game?
jackie 'anakin' tokeman
men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth - more than ruin,
more even than death
- bertrand russell
------------------------------
From: GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:23:44 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >>>>> BrendaLee writes:
>
> BrendaLee> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> >>>>> BrendaLee writes:
> >>
> BrendaLee> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
> >> >>
>
> [snip]
>
> >> >> >> I am sorry your experience of American women has
> >> >> >> been so poor.
>
> Aaron> Actually, my own PERSONAL experience has been ok. However, one does
> Aaron> not need to personally experience divorce, etc. to know how badly the
> Aaron> guys get shafted....all you need to do is pay attention to what is
> Aaron> happening to all of the other men around you.
>
> >> >> I do. I have personally seen no bad cases. All the divorces
> >> >> I personally know about were settled on child support, not
> >> >> alimony. And in the cases where the woman was the larger breadwinner
> >> >> and joint or paternal custody, the woman paid the child support.
>
> BrendaLee> Just because you have never seen one does not mean they don't
> BrendaLee> exist. For instance, my stepfather got divorced from his first
>
> >> True, I did not say they didn't. I said that in my experience
> >> they were unseen, and therefore I expected they were rare.
>
> BrendaLee> Yes you did, I saw that as I was continuing the thread, but wanted
> BrendaLee> to place a concrete example of my saying that there were
> BrendaLee> exceptions.
>
> There certainly are.
>
> BrendaLee> wife. I have no idea what she said to that judge but he was taken
> BrendaLee> for the ride of his life. Literally. He was forced to pay her
> BrendaLee> 'alimony' for the ''rest of her life''. It was garnisheed from his
> BrendaLee> wages automatically every week. On top of child support. And twice
> BrendaLee> that I know of he went to court and pleaded that he had another
> BrendaLee> family and could they lower it and he was told by the judge to
> BrendaLee> *get another job*.
>
> BrendaLee> I am sure this in not the norm, but it can, and did happen. And I
> BrendaLee> witnessed it with my own eyes. I do believe nowadays there is a
> BrendaLee> two-year-get-back-on-your-feet helping out period or something
> BrendaLee> similar in certain cases.... At least that is what I have heard.
>
> >> That would be state law, and local to your area.
>
> BrendaLee> Okay, I am not familiar enough with state laws to know for sure. I
> BrendaLee> just knew that it was wrong to make him pay for that duration. And
> BrendaLee> what makes it worse was that she was a very big woman and was
> BrendaLee> physically abusive to him. I saw her take a phone one day, and as
> BrendaLee> he was about halfway down the steps she flung the phone at him and
> BrendaLee> it hit him in the middle of the back dropping him to his knees. He
> BrendaLee> finally got up and continued walking out the door.
>
> BrendaLee> He got it from all angles.
>
> BrendaLee> BrendaLee
>
> BrendaLee> In all honesty though this was a while back and I believe things
> BrendaLee> have since changed for the better.
>
> I hope in general, but expect there will always be some horrible cases.
>
> In Mass, the JSC just ruled that a man has to continue paying child support
> for kids he did not father. Their reasoning was, if I understand it correctly,
> that he did not challenge paternity in time. He had been paying CS for some
> years before becoming aware he was not the father.
>
Well, that's typical for Mass. Too many liberals for anybody. They
need pure common sense. It doesn't happen in Washington State. Not the
above that is.
Here, if a woman did what Brenda related, the woman would land up in
jail for assault.
Here we do not discriminate about sex. As one judge said "Just the
facts Maam, Just the facts!"
> --
> Andrew Hall
> (Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
--
V
------------------------------
From: Al <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Quicken for Linux???
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 00:27:31 GMT
Does any company make a Quicken like product for Linux??? This is one
of my must have apps.
Al
------------------------------
From: Al <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Palm Synching and Linux PIM
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 00:30:40 GMT
Are there any programs on linux that are like M$ Outlook (PIM). I also
need to synch up my contacts in Palm with the PIM.
Al
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matt Kennel)
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Treason (was Re: Communism)
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 00:31:48 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-To: mbkennel@<REMOVE THE BAD DOMAIN>yahoo.spam-B-gone.com
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001 20:13:26 GMT, Doug Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:"Aaron R. Kulkis" wrote:
:
:> Since you advocate a large number of Communist policies, then I'm gonna
:> call you a Communist.
:>
:
:I just caught up with this thread today, so I'm not sure which "Communist
:policies" you're talking about. Most worthwhile historians feel that the basic
:economic ideas of Communism could have worked in ***SOME COUNTRIES***, at least
:in terms of industrialising to the point where a country can compete in a
:global, or even a regional market. However, those same historians acknowledge
:that the ***METHOD*** by which Communism has been implemented in 99% of
:instances has been obnoxious and violent. You have to differentiate between the
:theory and the actual practice.
Sure you can differentiate it but the link is critical.
There is no empirically practical way to implement the economic theory
without the practice of state terror and mob violence. Which is
precisely Lenin's horrific insight.
:Doug
--
* Matthew B. Kennel/Institute for Nonlinear Science, UCSD
*
* "To chill, or to pop a cap in my dome, whoomp! there it is."
* Hamlet, Fresh Prince of Denmark.
------------------------------
From: GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Feminism ==> subjugation of males
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:32:22 -0700
jet wrote:
>
> Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
> > >
> > > Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
> > > >>
> > > Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
> > > >> >>
> > > Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
> > > >> >> >>
> > > Aaron> Brent R wrote:
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> > Modern feminism decries "the patriarchy", and then
> whines for
> > > >> >> >> >> > it to come back and clean up her diapers, because she
> still hasn't
> > > >> >> >> >> > learned to shit in the toilet.
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> Jesus man, do you really have to be that crude?
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >> Be careful Aaron, not all women are like that, I wouldn't
> even say the
> > > >> >> >>
> > > Aaron> I wasn't referring to "all women" is was referring to that
> body
> > > Aaron> known as "feminism"
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> No, you are talking about a tiny minority of those women who
> > > >> >> >> self-identify as feminist. For most women that means that
> women
> > > >> >> >> have equal rights as men. Not the lunatic fringe that
> declare
> > > >> >> >> all heterosexual sex is rape.
> > > >> >>
> > > Aaron> Thank you for agreeing with me.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> So you think most women that call themselves feminists
> > > >> >> are not really feminists?
> > > >>
> > > Aaron> Most American women who don't even call themselves feminists
> have a SEVERE
> > > Aaron> "women should be able to take anything a man has, and give
> nothing
> > > Aaron> in return" attitude.
> > >
> > > Aaron> Those who do call themselves feminist advocate the use of
> kangaroo
> > > Aaron> courts to accomplish it.
> > >
> > > >> You did not answer my questions.
> > >
> > > >> I am sorry your experience of American women has
> > > >> been so poor.
> > >
> > > Aaron> Actually, my own PERSONAL experience has been ok. However,
> one does
> > > Aaron> not need to personally experience divorce, etc. to know how
> badly the
> > > Aaron> guys get shafted....all you need to do is pay attention to
> what is
> > > Aaron> happening to all of the other men around you.
> > >
> > > I do. I have personally seen no bad cases. All the divorces
> > > I personally know about were settled on child support, not
> > > alimony. And in the cases where the woman was the larger breadwinner
> > > and joint or paternal custody, the woman paid the child support.
> > >
> > > >> I personally know no women that are at all like
> > > >> the ones you seem to think are most American women.
> > >
> > > Aaron> You must live in a cave.
> > >
> > > Nope, but perhaps I hang with a better crowd than you do.
> >
> > This is your way of saying that you don't associate with American women...
> >
>
> Sour grapes from the reject who is pretending he is doing the rejecting.
>
> J
What seems isn't necessarily so. In our city, Bremerton,WA., the
sailors complain a lot of the womens' self esteem here. In Seattle,
women are women. In Bremerton, the women are looking for H. Gorgeous
Right. Nothing wrong with that, except these are very fat women looking
for hunks. These so-called hunks won't have a damn thing to do with
them.
I've worked with these obese women for over 20 years. I've heard it
all.
In Bremerton the sailors call these obese women "Bremelos",
"Bremasarauses". In the town across the bay, Port Orchard, they're
called "Port-a-Potamus". Even my wife said that these women have a self
esteem problem. She says that a woman should look her best and a man
should look his best. Believe me, the Bremelos do not look good to
anybody. Some even smell bad. Go to Seattle or any other city and its
not the case.
Again I suggest to the singles scene... make damn sure you know who you
are trying to know.
--
V
------------------------------
From: GreyCloud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why left-wing communist assholes hate Reagan. (was Re:
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:36:02 -0700
The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
>
> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Aaron R. Kulkis
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote
> on Sun, 22 Apr 2001 19:09:35 -0400
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> [snip for brevity]
>
> >Are you aware that, according to feminist doctrine, ***ALL*** sex
> >between men and women (including consensual sex between a husband
> >and wife) is rape.
>
> *Some* feminist doctrine. I rather doubt all feminists think this.
>
> (Of course, one might make the case that sex without proper foreplay
> is a form of rape, or at least uncomfortable.)
>
Crips! Without the foreplay, and done properly, the guy is nothing but
a selfish jag!
> [rest snipped]
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- insert random misquote here
> EAC code #191 10d:06h:26m actually running Linux.
> A man and his roomie walked into a bar...."Ouch", they said.
--
V
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: soc.men,soc.singles,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: Why Linux Is no threat to Windows domination of the desktop
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 20:35:59 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
>
> Aaron> Ray Fischer wrote:
> >>
> >> Aaron R. Kulkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >Ray Fischer wrote:
> >> >> nunnayabidniz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> >homosexuality is not genetic, it is a choice.
> >> >>
> >> >> Why did you choose to be heterosexual?
> >> >
> >> >because successful DNA are those that reproduce.
> >>
> >> That isn't an answer. Why did YOU CHOOSE to be heterosexual?
> >>
> >> >There are only two explanations for homosexuality
> >>
> >> That you are capable of accepting. Given your obvious bigotry and
> >> scientific illiteracy, I'd hardly consider your opinion to be worth
> >> anything.
>
> Aaron> You're either born with it (genetic), or you choose it (for whatever
> Aaron> reason).
>
> Aaron> So, homosexuality is the result of either a genetic defect, or a choice.
>
> Aaron> There are *NO* other options.
>
> Either you are born left handed (genetic), or you choose to be left handed (for
> whatever reason).
>
> So, left-handedness is the result of either a genetic defect, or a choice.
>
> There are *NO* other option.
Clue for the clueless.
Homosexuality is a defect, as it interferes with the organism's ability
to successfully reproduce (yes, your only TRUE purpose is to pass your
DNA on to the next generation)
Left-handedness is a benign variance, which has little or no effect on
the ability to reproduce, or anything else, for that matter.
Hope that helps.
>
> (For the irony impaired, I am just pointing out _one_ of the several
> Kulkis logic errors in his post.).
>
> --
> Andrew Hall
> (Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
