Linux-Advocacy Digest #707, Volume #33 Thu, 19 Apr 01 19:13:07 EDT
Contents:
Re: Communism ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Communism ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Communism ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
Re: Communism ("Aaron R. Kulkis")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.society.liberalism,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:36:19 -0400
Mathew wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
> > >
> > > Aaron> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >>>>> Aaron R Kulkis writes:
> > > >>
> > > Aaron> Fulcanelli wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> > Walter Daniels wrote:
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > >
> > > >> >> > > The Japanese Government(?) and Japanese business, are so
>intertwined
> > > >> >> > > taht there isd effectively no difference. This due in large part, to
> > > >> >> > > their decision after WWII, to "co-ordinate" business policies. There
> > > >> >> > > is a ministry, whose name escapes me, that literally controls
>research
> > > >> >> > > and development. No R&D is done, without their permission. IIRC, it
> > > >> >> > > also determines what can be imprted/exported.
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > Which, of course, means you have a state capitalist system, similar in
> > > >> >> > ways to authoritarian state capitalist systems in other Asian states,
>like
> > > >> >> > Korea and Taiwan, though each have moved towards democracy, and Japan
>is
> > > >> >> > democratic.
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > None of that suggests Japan is fascist. Anyone who makes that claim
>is
> > > >> >> > ignorant about what fascism is, and engaged in hyperbolic rhetoric
>that
> > > >> >> > creates more heat than light.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Good point. Fascism has always, by it's nature, been anti-democratic
>and
> > > >> >> to equate a democratic nation with Fascism is silly. Now some people
> > > >> >> might argue that the democracy is an illusion, like some Socialists, but
> > > >> >> they'd never do something like claim that a democratic nation is
>Fascist.
> > > >> >> Another thing Daniels doesn't know is that, in Fascism, the state
> > > >> >> *assists* big business in maintaining and increasing production, as
> > > >> >> opposed to acting as a burden. This would make the Bush administration
> > > >> >> more like Fascism than Japan easily.
> > > >>
> > > Aaron> Clue for the Clueless...most of the "corporate welfare", as Robert
>Reich
> > > Aaron> so succinctly put it...was instituted by Democrats.
> > >
> > > >> Lots was, but I expect most of that is now rolled off.
> > >
> > > Aaron> Republicans (and especially libertarians) advocate that the government
> > > Aaron> neither hinder NOR ASSIST businesses.
> > >
> > > >> Read the Cato (fairly libertarian) report on Corporate Welfare. The
> > > >> GOP is in it as big as the democrats were when they were in power.
> > >
> > > Aaron> And this absolves the Demoncrooks of guilt how exactly?
> > >
> > > In no way manner or form. The democrats are as bad
> >
> >
> > Then why do you keep voting for them?
> >
> >
> >
> > When are you going to do the right thing and vote Libertarian???
> > HMMMMMMMMM?
>
> Some of their beliefs seem far fetched.
>
As opposed to your belief that stealing isn't really stealing if it's
perpetrated by government officials who will send THEIR police to lock
you up in THEIR jail, and try you in THEIR court if you refuse to roll
over like a good patsy.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.society.liberalism,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:39:14 -0400
Rob Robertson wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > >>>>> Rob Robertson writes:
> >
> > Rob> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >>>>> Rob Robertson writes:
> > >>
> > Rob> Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >>
> > snip>
> > >>
> > >> >> what a maroon.
> > >>
> > Rob> Stop playing "More Libertarian than thou". It's unseemly.
> > >>
> > >> Kulkis is not vaguely libertarian. He repeatedly calls for the
> > >> murder of people that disagree with him.
> >
> > Rob> When reason fails, weapons prevail. I think his trip-wire temper
> > Rob> works against him, but for the most part I understand the attitude.
> >
> > I do not understand advocating killing people for their beliefs.
> > I only understand killing in self defense. And I only consider
> > physical force in defending oneself or another innocent from real
> > harm. Ideas should be fought with other ideas. He also recently
> > advocated a modern version of debtor prison. He is not fond of
> > liberty.
>
> Self-defense in the face of rising totalitarianism is not a cut-and-dried
> matter of facing down some jackbooted thug from a militia bunker; there is
> the question of the initiation of violence and whether taxes taken at the
> (implied) point of a gun constitutes the first strike against freedom. If
> someone is merely parking their barrel-filled Ryder truck right next to
> your car in a parking lot, how long do you wait before taking defensive
> action, even to the point of 'violating' their right of personal property
> by opening up the back of the truck to disarm the bomb?
>
> I think the same holds true regarding the subversion of the Constitution
> and individual liberties in America, and the question of when to act and
> what actions to take in response to that very real threat deserves some
> thoughtful consideration, though I have always held to the notion that
> every rational response must be exhausted before taking the next step.
>
> > >> He is also deeply dishonest, stooping to forgery (of his own words
> > >> no less) to cover up his own disability to read his own words.
> >
> > Rob> What did he forge?
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/groups?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/groups?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/groups?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Check the progression of his question to me in the thread. He later
> > claimed that I was the one that had forged the post, but that would
> > make no sense, as the forgery just covered up his own stupidity in
> > not having read his own words carefully.
>
> It boils down to this;
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Aaron> You know...name some Communist-style government policies that
> > Aaron> you disagree with.
> > >>
> > >> Can't think of any in the real world.
> >
> > Aaron> then you're a Communist.
> >
> > Because I do not agree with any of their policies?
>
> You just said that you can't think of any that you do disagree with.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> His original statement read "name some Communist-style government
> policies that you AGREE with" [emph. mine] and it does appear that
> he changed it to "disagree" after he realized that you weren't
> saying what he'd thought you said.
>
> What's the deal with the forgery, Kulkis?
Hall changed disagree to agree
>
> > >> He is a worse excuse for a libertarian than Mark Gibson.
> > >>
> > >> And he lies, regularly.
> >
> > Rob> About what?
> >
> > Anything he wants to. One example is later in the above referenced
> > thread. Another one was in this thread where he declared that I vote
> > for democrats and later when he claimed I supported socialist programs.
>
> I saw that. Hey, that's what you get for swapping targets on a regular
> basis -- sometimes you have a long run of exposing lying left-wingers,
> and as soon as they have you pegged as a 'fascist', you turn your guns
> on conservatives, until *they* have you pegged as a 'socialist weasel'!
>
> I've dealt with other shoot-from-the-hip loose cannons before, and this
> isn't all that different from my other past experiences.
>
> > He has also lied about my position on global warming, accusing me of being
> > a vociferous proponent of the man-made warming theory, when the reality
> > is that I claim no knowledge of the answer to that question (as you probably
> > inferred from our theoretical discussion of the role of government in a
> > solution to GW _if_ were to be proven true).
>
> I thought you were awfully quick to default to a government solution to
> the problem. The way I see it, you come to libertarianism from the old
> 'Democrats are for the little guy' school of thought, and the argument
> of using the government to cure societal ills is still acceptable to you
> on some level, whereas my views stem more from an ill-defined sense of
> anarcho-capitalism, and I came to Libertarianism as an activist approach
> to stopping the predations of the state. Maybe I'm just more reflexively
> cynical than you, but I still didn't think that a) you were a proponent
> of the GW theory, or 2) that you're ideologically shut off from a purely
> market-derived solution to the problem. It was a fair and open exchange
> of ideas, as it always has been.
>
> Face it, Andrew; it takes a while to get a handle on where you're coming
> from sometimes, and a hothead like Kulkis is going to jump at the slightest
> whiff of what may be construed as advocacy of increased state power. That's
> his error, but I see where it's coming from, even if it doesn't excuse it.
>
> > There are countless other
> > examples if you look closely. I have caught him in lies about the taxes
> > he pays, he has made false statements about science then ran when presented
> > with references that prove him wrong (just like Lochner and Yeadon).
>
> Well, that doesn't do anyone any good, does it.
>
> > >> He is the moral equivalent of the weasels.
> >
> > Rob> I'd like to see you make the case for that.
> >
> > See above. I meant in the way he "debates" on usenet, not the programs
> > he advocates.
>
> Understood. I await his response.
>
> > --
> > Andrew Hall
> > (Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
>
> _
> Rob
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.society.liberalism,misc.survivalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:42:02 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >>>>> Rob Robertson writes:
>
> Rob> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> >>>>> Rob Robertson writes:
> >>
> Rob> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >>>>> Rob Robertson writes:
> >> >>
> Rob> Aaron R. Kulkis wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> >>
> snip>
> >> >>
> >> >> >> what a maroon.
> >> >>
> Rob> Stop playing "More Libertarian than thou". It's unseemly.
> >> >>
> >> >> Kulkis is not vaguely libertarian. He repeatedly calls for the
> >> >> murder of people that disagree with him.
> >>
> Rob> When reason fails, weapons prevail. I think his trip-wire temper
> Rob> works against him, but for the most part I understand the attitude.
> >>
> >> I do not understand advocating killing people for their beliefs.
> >> I only understand killing in self defense. And I only consider
> >> physical force in defending oneself or another innocent from real
> >> harm. Ideas should be fought with other ideas. He also recently
> >> advocated a modern version of debtor prison. He is not fond of
> >> liberty.
>
> Rob> Self-defense in the face of rising totalitarianism is not a cut-and-dried
> Rob> matter of facing down some jackbooted thug from a militia bunker; there is
> Rob> the question of the initiation of violence and whether taxes taken at the
> Rob> (implied) point of a gun constitutes the first strike against freedom. If
> Rob> someone is merely parking their barrel-filled Ryder truck right next to
> Rob> your car in a parking lot, how long do you wait before taking defensive
> Rob> action, even to the point of 'violating' their right of personal property
> Rob> by opening up the back of the truck to disarm the bomb?
>
> Rob> I think the same holds true regarding the subversion of the Constitution
> Rob> and individual liberties in America, and the question of when to act and
> Rob> what actions to take in response to that very real threat deserves some
> Rob> thoughtful consideration, though I have always held to the notion that
> Rob> every rational response must be exhausted before taking the next step.
>
> Yes, and advocating shooting people because they are democrats
> does not qualify. Ever.
Wrong. I advocate taking a VOTE on whether democrats should be shot,
according to Democrat ideals (will of the majority = final decision).
I think it's pretty funny how know every professed Democrat always
questions the vality of the vote which is based on the same principles
which they supposedly subscribe to.
Maybe their true belief should be stated as "the will of the people AS LONG
AS THE PEOPLE AGREE WITH [ME]"
>
> >> >> He is also deeply dishonest, stooping to forgery (of his own words
> >> >> no less) to cover up his own disability to read his own words.
>
> Rob> What did he forge?
>
> http> groups.google.com/groups?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> http> groups.google.com/groups?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> http> groups.google.com/groups?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> Check the progression of his question to me in the thread. He later
> >> claimed that I was the one that had forged the post, but that would
> >> make no sense, as the forgery just covered up his own stupidity in
> >> not having read his own words carefully.
>
> Rob> It boils down to this;
>
> Rob> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Aaron> You know...name some Communist-style government policies that
> Aaron> you disagree with.
> >> >>
> >> >> Can't think of any in the real world.
> >>
> Aaron> then you're a Communist.
> >>
> >> Because I do not agree with any of their policies?
>
> Rob> You just said that you can't think of any that you do disagree with.
> Rob> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Rob> His original statement read "name some Communist-style government
> Rob> policies that you AGREE with" [emph. mine] and it does appear that
> Rob> he changed it to "disagree" after he realized that you weren't
> Rob> saying what he'd thought you said.
>
> Rob> What's the deal with the forgery, Kulkis?
>
> A cowardly inability to admit he failed to read his own words
> correctly.
>
> He went on in other posts in that thread to accuse me of doing
> the forgery and of posting a forged cancel on one of the posts.
>
> He is a liar and a scumbag.
>
> >> >> He is a worse excuse for a libertarian than Mark Gibson.
>
> >> >> And he lies, regularly.
>
> Rob> About what?
>
> >> Anything he wants to. One example is later in the above referenced
> >> thread. Another one was in this thread where he declared that I vote
> >> for democrats and later when he claimed I supported socialist programs.
>
> Rob> I saw that. Hey, that's what you get for swapping targets on a regular
> Rob> basis -- sometimes you have a long run of exposing lying left-wingers,
> Rob> and as soon as they have you pegged as a 'fascist', you turn your guns
> Rob> on conservatives, until *they* have you pegged as a 'socialist weasel'!
>
> That is no excuse for lying.
>
> Rob> I've dealt with other shoot-from-the-hip loose cannons before, and this
> Rob> isn't all that different from my other past experiences.
>
> He has had able time to correct his misconceptions. Clearly
> truth means nothing to him next to his blustering.
>
> >> He has also lied about my position on global warming, accusing me of being
> >> a vociferous proponent of the man-made warming theory, when the reality
> >> is that I claim no knowledge of the answer to that question (as you probably
> >> inferred from our theoretical discussion of the role of government in a
> >> solution to GW _if_ were to be proven true).
>
> Rob> I thought you were awfully quick to default to a government solution to
> Rob> the problem. The way I see it, you come to libertarianism from the old
>
> I know you thought that, but the point I am making here is that I
> have no opinion on whether or not GW is happening or if it is, if
> it is caused by man. The point here is not our disagreement about
> what might be the solution if in fact it proves to be a real but the
> fact that he lied about my opinion. You asked for examples of his
> lies, and this was one. When I corrected his lie, he did not retract
> or apologize, he just ran away. Just like a weasel.
>
> Rob> 'Democrats are for the little guy' school of thought, and the argument
> Rob> of using the government to cure societal ills is still acceptable to you
> Rob> on some level, whereas my views stem more from an ill-defined sense of
> Rob> anarcho-capitalism, and I came to Libertarianism as an activist approach
> Rob> to stopping the predations of the state. Maybe I'm just more reflexively
> Rob> cynical than you, but I still didn't think that a) you were a proponent
> Rob> of the GW theory, or 2) that you're ideologically shut off from a purely
> Rob> market-derived solution to the problem. It was a fair and open exchange
> Rob> of ideas, as it always has been.
>
> Yes, and is a side point to the issue at hand of Mr. Kulkis' dishonesty.
>
> (I would be happy to explore further practical solutions to environmental
> problems in another thread).
>
> Rob> Face it, Andrew; it takes a while to get a handle on where you're coming
> Rob> from sometimes, and a hothead like Kulkis is going to jump at the slightest
>
> He has had plenty of time.
>
> Rob> whiff of what may be construed as advocacy of increased state power. That's
> Rob> his error, but I see where it's coming from, even if it doesn't excuse it.
>
> >> There are countless other
> >> examples if you look closely. I have caught him in lies about the taxes
> >> he pays, he has made false statements about science then ran when presented
> >> with references that prove him wrong (just like Lochner and Yeadon).
>
> Rob> Well, that doesn't do anyone any good, does it.
>
> Nope.
>
> >> >> He is the moral equivalent of the weasels.
>
> Rob> I'd like to see you make the case for that.
>
> >> See above. I meant in the way he "debates" on usenet, not the programs
> >> he advocates.
>
> Rob> Understood. I await his response.
>
> That will be interesting, if he does not cut and run again.
> Which of course, would say something in and of itself.
>
> Boy, the market sure liked Greenspan's surprise move today.
> Scary how much power that guy has!
>
> --
> Andrew Hall
> (Now reading Usenet in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh...)
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron R. Kulkis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.destroy.microsoft,us.military.army,soc.singles
Subject: Re: Communism
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:43:59 -0400
billh wrote:
>
> "Aaron R. Kulkis"
>
> > Notice how Bill Hudson refuses to tell us how long he's served in any
> combat zones.
> >
> > Must be because the number of months = ZERO.
>
> I posted it once (I actually counted the LES's). Find it, "war-hero"
> wannabe.
Tell us again...just for the record.
--
Aaron R. Kulkis
Unix Systems Engineer
DNRC Minister of all I survey
ICQ # 3056642
L: This seems to have reduced my spam. Maybe if everyone does it we
can defeat the email search bots. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K: Truth in advertising:
Left Wing Extremists Charles Schumer and Donna Shalala,
Black Seperatist Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan,
Special Interest Sierra Club,
Anarchist Members of the ACLU
Left Wing Corporate Extremist Ted Turner
The Drunken Woman Killer Ted Kennedy
Grass Roots Pro-Gun movement,
J: Other knee_jerk reactionaries: billh, david casey, redc1c4,
The retarded sisters: Raunchy (rauni) and Anencephielle (Enielle),
also known as old hags who've hit the wall....
I: Loren Petrich's 2-week stubborn refusal to respond to the
challenge to describe even one philosophical difference
between himself and the communists demonstrates that, in fact,
Loren Petrich is a COMMUNIST ***hole
H: "Having found not one single carbon monoxide leak on the entire
premises, it is my belief, and Willard concurs, that the reason
you folks feel listless and disoriented is simply because
you are lazy, stupid people"
G: Knackos...you're a retard.
F: Unit_4's "Kook hunt" reminds me of "Jimmy Baker's" harangues against
adultery while concurrently committing adultery with Tammy Hahn.
E: Jet is not worthy of the time to compose a response until
her behavior improves.
D: Jet Silverman now follows me from newgroup to newsgroup
...despite (C) above.
C: Jet Silverman claims to have killfiled me.
B: Jet Silverman plays the fool and spews out nonsense as a
method of sidetracking discussions which are headed in a
direction that she doesn't like.
A: The wise man is mocked by fools.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.advocacy.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Advocacy Digest
******************************
